MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #148 The Witch’s Mirror 1962 & The Curse of the Crying Woman 1963

THE WITCH’S MIRROR 1962

For as long as I can remember, Mexican Gothic horror has held me in its spell—a mysterious enchantress. It’s a genre that doesn’t rush to terrify but creeps, with all the grace of crumbling haciendas and forgotten rituals, a thing of uncanny, eerie, atmospheric beauty.

That beguiling mix of sophistication and a bit of a spectral menace has been my cinematic obsession, and soon enough, at The Last Drive In, I’m ecstatic to say I’m planning on unraveling these haunting tales in all their rich, shadowed glory. And not always exclusively poetically Gothic… Abel Salazar’s turn in The Brainiac/el Baron del Terror 1962 proves that vengeance never looked so delightfully bizarre: a comically monstrous baron (Abel Salazar) returning from the Inquisition’s flames, armed with a forked tongue for brain-sucking and an impeccably grim sense of revenge, proves that in Mexican Gothic horror, even a centuries-old curse can come with a wink and a forked tongue firmly in cheek of campy charm.

Mexican directors like Chano Urueta, Carlos Enrique Taboada, Fernando Méndez, and Rafael Baledón wove tales where the uncanny is everyday, where haunted mansions are not mere settings but characters steeped in cultural memory, and where the supernatural reflects the darkest ache of human frailty and historical burden. Mexican Gothic horror reimagines the European tradition onto a landscape scorched by history and infused with folk belief. These films’ shadow-heavy, sparsely furnished interiors don’t just set the scene; they breathe a tangible dread, favoring spectral haze over baroque European flourish, tinged with repression and familial betrayal, while steering clear of monstrous spectacle. They tended to focus on mood, psychological tension, and the uncanny rooted in folklore and cultural history. The emergence of Gothic sensibility in Mexican horror cinema marked a profound evolution in the genre, transforming it from straightforward monster tales into a nuanced exploration of psychological, social, and moral anxieties bathed in atmospheric dread and framed within a distinctly Mexican cultural landscape. Echoing European Gothic traditions, this movement adopted and adapted motifs of haunted mansions, spectral vengeance, and forbidden knowledge, infusing them with colonial legends, supernatural folklore, social realism, and a rich atmospheric texture that emphasized mood, isolation, and the uncanny. Central to this sensibility was a deep engagement with themes of deception and the fractured human psyche, inner conflict, and the duality of good vs evil, often portrayed through claustrophobic settings, chiaroscuro lighting, and slow-building anxiety rather than overt gore or spectacle.

Mexican Gothic horror films like The Witch’s Mirror and The Curse of the Crying Woman walk that fascinating line between psychological unease and overt supernatural spectacle. While the genre often shares a commitment to atmospheric tension, deep cultural roots, and an exploration of human fears, it does not shy away from revealing terrifying, tangible horrors, such as the ancient eyeless witch whose presence dominates the latter film. This openness to explicit monstrous imagery distinguishes Mexican Gothic from other strands of horror that rely almost exclusively on suggestion, shadow, and the unseen to evoke fear, a sensibility you see in the films of Val Lewton. Here, the horror feels both intimate and immediate, grounded in visceral and unsettling visuals that confront us directly. Mexican Gothic cinema often synthesizes these elements and infuses its films with sometimes brutal displays of the uncanny, striking a compelling, evocative, and unflinching balance. This dynamic interplay between the suggestive and the explicit allows Mexican Gothic films to evoke a haunting sense of decay and moral ambiguity, where ancient witchcraft or scientific coldness compete not only with each other but also with our expectations about fear and spectacle.

This sensibility, born in black and white, a flicker of the ’50s and ’60s, pulses with a moral complexity and atmospheric richness that redefined horror beyond sudden shocks to something unsettlingly poetic. It is a cinema that speaks in whispers rather than screams, inviting us to peer behind the veil of apparitions and into the very heart of a haunted culture. In the deeper essay to come, I will trace this evocative lineage, diving deep into the works that shaped Mexican Gothic’s unique dialogue between past and present, intimacy and terror, myth and reality. Stay tuned, as I explore the uncanny reflections in The Witch’s Mirror, The Curse of the Crying Woman further and beyond.

Reflections of Revenge and Ritual: Unveiling Chano Urueta’s The Witch’s Mirror in Mexican Gothic Horror

In the shadowed corridors of Mexican cinema’s golden era, its own distinct brand of Gothic sensibility took root, an elegy whispered in chiaroscuro, where ancestral ghosts twist with the weight of colonial ghosts yet unsettled. Mexican Gothic cinema doesn’t indulge in the sumptuous, sensuous romanticism typical of its European Gothic counterpart; instead, it roots itself in a grittier, more immediate reality.

Emerging from the decay of grand haciendas and curses uttered quietly, lingering in ancient mirrors, films like The Witch’s Mirror use stark black-and-white visuals to emphasize collapse, neglect, and claustrophic interiors capturing peeling walls, overgrown cemeteries, and unsettling domestic spaces filled with hidden terrors, turning the environment into something more than a backdrop, but almost a living, brooding presence that wraps itself around the story.

In the feverish gloom of Mexico’s golden age of horror, Chano Urueta’s The Witch’s Mirror (1962) carves a place for itself with a genre-blending swirl of Gothic intrigue, medical suspense, and supernatural revenge.

The Witch’s Mirror (El espejo de la bruja) is the first in Chano Urueta’s unforgettable horror trilogy for ABSA and a key chapter in the studio’s Gothic saga. Alongside Urueta’s distinctive sure hand behind the camera, this film quietly brings in that other giant of Mexican horror, Carlos Enrique Taboada, not yet as a director but as a formidable presence as the film’s screenwriter and the mind orchestrating its intricate plot.

What’s striking here is how Taboada’s script reveals its true shape only after you’ve surrendered to its haunted corridors; it unfolds with all its complexity gradually, presenting a world where morality resists clear boundaries. An amoral tale where lines between right and wrong shimmer and vanish, and where the dark heart of the story is a duel between two forms of cunning: It’s a story where the clash becomes an unsettling contest fought by ancient witchcraft and chilling science, each with its own brand of darkness.

There’s no sanctity here, only shifting shadows that run through every scene, inviting us to explore a space where neither side comes out innocent; both are allowed the same wicked edge. In this world, the sinister isn’t a shadow cast in one direction, but a fog that seeps into every corner. It is just never that straightforward, but always layered and complex. It’s the sort of complexity that makes revisiting these films endlessly rewarding, and reminds me why the Gothic, especially in Mexican cinema, is so enticing and thoroughly compelling.

With The Witch’s Mirror, Urueta, a master of visual invention, orchestrates a whirlwind narrative where the chilling performances of Isabela Corona as the cunning witch Sara, Armando Calvo as the coldly ambitious Dr. Eduardo Ramos, Rosita Arenas as the ill-fated Deborah, and Dina de Marco as the tragic Elena anchor a tale that skips past cliché and plunges straight into the gorgeously painted macabre.

Urueta’s directing eye, aided by the atmospheric black-and-white cinematography of Jorge Stahl Jr., fills the screen with brooding shadows, empty interiors, and artfully surreal supernatural tableaus, a style that nods to Universal monster classics while weaving a distinctly Mexican sensibility primed for local and international fans alike.

The tragedy at the heart of the story is, on the surface, pretty straightforward: Dr. Ramos has grown to despise his wife Elena and plots to kill her so he can marry Deborah, a naive young woman completely unaware of his dark intentions. Elena, meanwhile, is Sara’s goddaughter; Sara is a formidable witch aligned with darker powers. Though Sara can’t stop Elena’s murder, she summons otherworldly forces to exact revenge on Eduardo Ramos and his new bride. Things take a twisted turn when an incident, cleverly disguised as an accident but in fact orchestrated by Sara, leaves Deborah horribly disfigured. What follows is Ramos’s obsessive, chilling quest to reclaim Deborah’s lost beauty, venturing further into shadowy, morally fraught terrain where the unethical, the unorthodox, and sacrilegious converge. In this place, conventional boundaries dissolve into a sinister haze of transgression.

The Witch’s Mirror opens with Sara, housekeeper and godmother to Elena, peering into her magic mirror and witnessing the fate of her beloved charge: Elena’s scientist husband, Eduardo, is about to poison her for the love of Deborah, his secret mistress. With cosmic powers blocked and revenge promised, Elena drinks the fatal potion and is interred in a bleak, candlelit cemetery scene.

Sara’s witchcraft bridges the chasm between life and death, calling Elena’s spirit to join her in plotting vengeance. Eduardo swiftly takes Deborah as his new wife, but the glow of marital bliss is darkened by the creeping chill and spectral phenomena stalking the mansion, music plays itself, wilted flowers resist Deborah’s touch, and Elena’s presence saturates the air.

Deborah suffers a supernatural attack, and Eduardo’s desperate solution is a descent into body horror: Eduardo launches a series of grotesque experiments (evoking French director Franju’s Eyes Without a Face 1960), robbing corpses for skin grafts and, ultimately, severed hands to repair the damage inflicted upon Deborah in a blaze of unearthly fire.

Urueta builds tension with set-bound claustrophobia and fraught, visceral pacing, crafting scenes where Deborah, shrouded in bandages, haunts the house as a living relic of Eduardo’s hubris, while Sara drives the narrative’s spectral machinery forward with incantations and vengeful resolve. The cold logic of Eduardo’s surgery collides with the fever-dream logic of Sara’s magic, and the climax reveals the monstrous cost: transplanted hands magically revert to those of Elena, moving with a will of their own.

Deborah, driven by occult force and unburdened fury, kills Eduardo in the supernatural thrust of justice; the horror piles on as severed hands take on Gustavo, and Sara uses her magic to help Elena find peace, having fulfilled her promise of vengeance, disappears into mist.

Of course, by now you know me, my natural inclination is to fully support Sara, yet what makes the film compelling is how it gradually shifts our sympathies toward the witch. Hating Eduardo is a given. This speaks to the deep, archetypal roots these characters embody. The witch resonates as a timeless figure from folk tradition, familiar and deeply human, connected to a primal desire for justice. In stark contrast, this cold-blooded murderer and deranged scientist represents a cold lack of humanity and arrogant rationality that was typical of American sci-fi villains of the era. Eduardo’s cruelty is undeniable, marking him as a reprehensible villain. While the pursuit of justice here tragically harms an innocent woman, the film challenges us to confront the complexities of vengeance and the dark consequences it can unleash.

Carlos Enrique Taboada, emerging in his early career but already displaying his mastery, takes the narrative of The Witch’s Mirror and turns it into a darkly elegant conflict. Here, he paints the picture of a malevolent supernatural force that sets loose a terrible, cruel vengeance on a murderous, corrupt, and unscrupulous scientific mind. Between these destructive powers stand the two young women, both beautiful, both tragically fated to become wounded sacrifices in this grim struggle. The Witch’s Mirror draws on timeless stories of the confrontation between good and evil.

For devotees of classic horror, the film offers subtle tributes to European masterpieces: Benjamin Christensen’s Häxan (1922), with its unsettling blend of folklore and documentary; Robert Wiene’s silent German expressionist masterpiece The Hands of Orlac (1924), evoking the dread of the unknown body; and Georges Franju’s Eyes Without a Face (1960), a haunting meditation on identity and monstrous transformation released just barely a year earlier and Jesús Franco’s Gritos en la noche / The Awful Dr. Orloff in 1962.

This careful blend of influences reveals not only Taboada’s cinematic literacy but also the thoughtful craftsmanship of producer Abel Salazar and director Chano Urueta. Layered atop these cinematic dialogues are universal mythologies, the restless spirit of the dead bride who returns, the archetypal witch, all woven seamlessly into ABSA’s signature claustrophobic brooding and oppressive environment with chilling grace.

With The Witch’s Mirror, Cinematográfica ABSA really found its footing as a studio making horror films that clicked with audiences, and even won over some of the usually harsh Mexican critics. This wasn’t a fluke. They brought together a team of skilled artists and technicians who combined their natural talents with a solid understanding of Gothic horror’s mechanics, skillfully adapting those classic fears and moods to a Mexican setting. The result was a film that felt both familiar and fresh, balancing proven horror formulas with a local flair that resonated deeply with audiences.

A brisk, 75-minute black-and-white night terror, The Witch’s Mirror became a landmark of Mexican horror by fusing European Gothic inspirations with folk mysticism and a uniquely Mexican moral sensibility; its reverberations echo in the later films of Carlos Enrique Taboada and the broader Latin American horror tradition. The iconic performances, haunting visual style, and deliriously inventive plotting combine to ensure Urueta’s film still lingers in the imagination, a shimmering reflection of revenge in a haunted glass.

THE CURSE OF THE CRYING WOMAN 1963

Echoes of Shadows , Blood and Hollow Eyes: Unraveling the Haunting Legacy of The Curse of the Crying Woman

The motif of dark, hollow eyes is a key and haunting visual element in The Curse of the Crying Woman, symbolizing the spectral presence of the weeping woman and the eerie, unsettling nature of the curse itself. This imagery recurs in moments of supernatural revelation and is central to the film’s unsettling atmosphere.

And yes, there is a compelling visual symmetry between Barbara Steele’s unforgettable image in Black Sunday 1960, standing amidst misty ruins with fierce dogs leashed by her side, and the eerie apparition with haunting black eyes in The Curse of the Crying Woman, portrayed by Rita Macedo as the sinister witch Selma, who similarly commands her spectral hounds within a desolate, atmospheric setting. Both sequences evoke a potent blend of Gothic allure and supernatural dominion, using the motif of women exerting eerie control over dark, menacing forces. This parallel underscores a shared cinematic language of fear and mystical power that defines these classic horror films.

The Curse of the Crying Woman (La Maldición de la Llorona), directed by Rafael Baledón in 1963, remains a standout symbol of Mexican Gothic horror that masterfully builds a mood thick with creeping unease with folkloric mysticism, crafting a film that remains captivating despite its modest budget. Starring Rosita Arenas as the innocent Amelia, Abel Salazar as her husband Jaime, and Rita Macedo as the enigmatic and sinister Aunt Selma. The fog-laden woods, shadow-drenched hacienda, and the eerie presence of the mansion are key visual elements that heighten the film’s unsettling mood. Themes of ancestral curses, witchcraft, madness, and resurrection are central, with the story focusing on the malevolent Aunt Selma’s plan to use Amelia as a vessel to resurrect an ancient witch.

The opening, and its undeniable suggestive power, is very reminiscent – and in the best way – of the classic Black Sunday (La maschera del demonio, 1960 aka The Mask of Satan), directed by the Italian maestro Mario Bava, a film which Baledón admitted to being an admirer of. As in that Italian cult movie, The Curse of the Crying Woman plunges us into a nineteenth-century terror with a deep Gothic vein, where the demonic forces incarnated in Aunt Selma come together with the heavy atmosphere of a gloomy mansion, in which her niece, Amelia, and her husband will spend a terrifying night.

From its ominous opening, where a stagecoach falls prey to a terrifying assailant, the film plunges us into a world drenched with Gothic tropes that feel both universal and uniquely Mexican. Unlike many adaptations, this version of the legendary La Llorona, a weeping specter whose cries foretell doom, deviates, instead presenting a tale centered around a cursed hacienda in the remote woods, haunted by dark secrets and malevolent sorcery.

The cinematography by José Ortiz Ramos employs evocative black-and-white visuals, with fog-laden woods and shadow-drenched interiors that transform the hacienda into a living entity. With its peeling walls, reverberating halls, and secret passageways, cobweb-infested tunnels, staircases leading to different levels, trapdoors, and secret rooms, the decrepit mansion becomes a claustrophobic stage where Amelia’s innocence confronts her aunt’s unnatural thirst for witchcraft and resurrection. Particularly noteworthy is the skillful deployment of lingering shots and contrasting shadows, which intensify the suspense and render even the most subdued moments charged with spectral portent. The visual atmosphere is thick with an almost tangible heaviness, as though the walls themselves are closing in, mirroring the unseen force tightening its grip as the curse edges forward, silent and relentless, slow but inevitable.

After a brutal and calculated attack on their stagecoach, which serves as the catalyst for the events to follow, newlyweds Amelia and Jaime arrive at Aunt Selma’s remote estate. Amelia immediately feels unsettled, her first unnerving encounter being a glance in an antique mirror revealing a dark-eyed woman and a corpse. Creeping tension mounts with strange cries in the night and Selma’s eerily unchanging youthful appearance, suggesting her unnatural pact with an ancient witch named Marina, kept in a liminal state between life and death. Selma’s plan becomes clear: she desires to use Amelia as a vessel to resurrect Marina, perpetuating a generations-old curse by sacrificing descendants of those who condemned Marina.

Selma reveals to Amelia that their family is cursed, the legacy of the original Crying Woman (La Llorona), who was a witch condemned and killed for her dark dealings. A central tension arises as Selma tries to resurrect her mother, Doña Marina’s, spirit through Amelia, intending to pass on the curse and continue her reign of terror.

In The Curse of the Crying Woman, Jaime’s character epitomizes the archetypal Gothic horror husband, frail, ineffectual, and deeply reliant on the strength of his wife, Amelia. Jaime often finds himself ensnared in danger, whether being overpowered by supernatural forces or succumbing to manipulation under the malevolent influence of Selma. His vulnerability is palpable as Amelia not only grapples with the haunting curse threatening their lives but also, of course, must take on the role of protector and savior. This dynamic inversion of traditional gender roles unearths an interesting complexity within their relationship, highlighting Amelia’s resilience against the backdrop of Jaime’s helplessness. Jaime’s sporadic moments of bravado are often undercut by his nervous disposition and tendency to involuntarily stumble into peril.

A chilling moment comes when the couple discovers the monstrous, however crude, make-up of Selma’s husband, disfigured and mad, locked away in the attic, whose presence punctuates the film’s pervasive sense of decay and hidden horrors. Their spectral presence, isolated and shrouded in darkness, symbolizes the decay and secrets lurking within the estate.

The climax hinges on Selma’s orchestration of a macabre ritual, culminating in the ringing of a massive bell, a haunting symbol that binds the film’s themes of doom, fate, and the supernatural. This bell tolls ominously as the conflict between old curses and desperate survival reaches its peak, marked by a tense and dramatic confrontation in the collapsing hacienda, where physical battles reach a fever pitch between the heroine and the film’s dark forces. The scene culminates with the ‘possessed’ Amelia trying to liberate La Llorona by removing a stake from her body, accompanied by the striking visual of a huge bell in the bell tower chiming twelve times.

The combination of the storming fight, the supernatural possession, and the hauntingly persistent bell delivers an unforgettable conclusion that is both Gothic magic and deeply unsettling. The climax signals the unraveling of the curse and the mansion’s decay, suggesting a Poe-like haunted house finale.

Thematically, The Curse of the Crying Woman explores inheritance not just of wealth but of darkness, the oppressive grip of history manifested through supernatural forces that blur the line between life and death. It engages with folklore while transplanting Gothic conventions, such as the haunted estate, familial madness, and resurrection, into Mexican contexts, making it a crucial point of cultural translation for the genre. The film’s restrained yet effective makeup effects (aside from the disfigured character shut away), atmospheric score, and artfully controlled pace merge elements to build a vivid cinematic world.

The Curse of the Crying Woman is a refined example of Mexican Gothic horror’s power to evoke nostalgia, mystery, and dread, steeped in ancestral curses and a family’s dark legacies. What draws me to this film is the creative vision of filmmakers like Rafael Baledón and the nuanced performances from Rosita Arenas and Rita Macedo, who so skillfully navigate the fragile balance between innocence, historic malignancy, and creeping doom. As someone who’s drawn to atmospheric, folk-inflected Gothic horror, The Curse of the Crying Woman feels like an essential, haunting classic I’ll keep coming back to.

The traditional version of La Llorona is the ghost of a woman who has drowned her children, returning to steal those of the Spanish settlers. Baledón’s free adaptation of the myth turns the classic colonial figure of filicide into a powerful witch, from whom Selma descends. Selma, too, is a sorceress who seeks to bring La Llorona back to life in a ritual in which Amelia will play a key role.

Baledón’s staging makes it one of the best films from the época d’oro, or golden age, where the highly accomplished sets by designer Roberto Silva, and Armando Meyer’s make-up, created a film now rightly regarded as among the best horror films of that decade (and subsequent ones as well), a triumphant finish for the Cinematográfica ABSA Gothic saga.

It is worth mentioning that The Curse of the Crying Woman (La maldición de la Llorona, 1963) is ABSA’s filmic testament, the total impact of its technical and artistic achievements, to which it pays self-tribute by incorporating footage from its previous titles as a macabre flashback. The film pays homage to ABSA’s earlier works by creating a self-referential tribute while wrapping up their legacy in an atmospheric way.

The legend of La Llorona, Mexico’s founding fright mother, has been present in Mexican cinema right from its earliest days. La Ilorona, directed by Ramón Peon, became the first feature film based on this legend and the first Mexican horror feature film back in 1933. She returned to Mexican movie screens with La herencia de la Llorona (1947) by Mauricio Magdaleno, and then again with La Llorona (1960) by René Cardona. A year later, in 1961, Cinematográfica ABSA started production on The Curse of the Crying Woman.

The most recent notable film about La Llorona is The Curse of La Llorona (2019), an American supernatural horror directed by Michael Chaves. The film was produced within The Conjuring Universe but is considered a standalone story. Another recent title is The Legend of La Llorona (2022), another American horror film directed by Patricia Harris Seeley, with a different take on the legend. I have yet to see either iteration of the legend.

#148 down, 2 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #63 The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake 1959/ The Thing that Couldn’t Die 1958 & The Brainiac 1962

THE FOUR SKULLS OF JONATHAN DRAKE 1959

The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959)-My lips are sealed, or “only the evil that men do, live after them!”

Let’s take a delightfully campy, tongue-in-cheek stroll through two of the kookiest crypt-crawlers the 1950s ever coughed up: The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959) and The Thing That Couldn’t Die (1958). Both are proof that sometimes the best chills come with a wink, a nudge, a pair of sandals made from 200-year-old skin from a walking dead tribal witch doctor, and a severed head in a box.

The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959), is a treasure brought to you by one of my favorite directors of the campy, the schlocky, and glorious B fare: Edward L. Cahn (Creature with the Atom Brain 1955, The She-Creature 1956, Invasion of the Saucer Men 1957, The Zombies of Mora Tau 1957, Invisible Invaders 1959 and my particular favorite It!, the Terror from Beyond Space 1958). The film stars Eduard Franz, Valerie French, Henry Daniell, Grant Richards, and Paul Wexler. It’s the macabre family tradition-every Drake man who hits sixty gets a complimentary disappearing head and a reserved spot in the crypt’s exclusive skull collection, all courtesy of a vengeful Jivaro shaman with a grudge that just won’t quit. A curse and a zombie with lips sewn shut (played by Paul Wexler, who looks like he had a run-in with an unoiled sewing machine).

Anthropologist Jonathan Drake (Eduard Franz, a man who’s seen one shrunken head too many) is next on the chopping block. After his brother’s head goes missing, in this family, losing your head isn’t just a figure of speech- it’s practically a rite of passage. Jonathan and his plucky daughter Alison (Valerie French) team up with a skeptical cop (Grant Richards) to unravel the mystery. The culprit? Dr. Emil Zurich (the wooden-faced Henry Daniell, as sinister ever), who’s been keeping himself alive by swapping heads and dabbling in immortality, with the help of Zutai, the world’s surliest and most persistent zombie, who makes vocalizations like Curly Howard of the Three Stooges when he’s hit with a bullet.

Key moments include Zutai’s stealthy rose-trellis climbs, heads turning up in crypts, and a police investigation where the only thing more suspicious than the deaths is the décor. The film’s atmosphere is pure Halloween fun: theremin music, foggy crypts, and enough skulls to make Hamlet jealous. In the end, The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake is less a whodunit and more a head-spinning carousel of curses, shrunken noggins, and stitched-lip zombies, all whirling around a family tree that’s overdue for some serious vengeful pruning.

Like a fever dream conjured by Edgar Allan Poe after a late-night binge on jungle adventure comics, the film barrels toward its climax with the subtlety of a headhunter at a flea market rummaging for skulls where immortality is just a stitch away, and the only thing more dangerous than the villain’s voodoo is the risk of losing your head before the credits roll.

THE THING THAT COULDN’T DIE 1958

Directed by Will Cowan and starring William Reynolds, Carolyn Kearney, Robin Hughes, and Andra Martin. If you’ve ever wondered what would happen if a psychic ranch girl, a box of evil, and a 16th-century Satanist’s head walked into a California dude ranch, wonder no more. The Thing That Couldn’t Die answers the question nobody asked: “How long can you keep a head in a centuries-old, sealed wooden crate before things get weird?”

Jessica (Carolyn Kearney), who can find water with a stick and has trouble with her psychic powers, unearths a centuries-old box on her aunt’s ranch. Instead of Spanish doubloons, out pops the still-living head of Gideon Drew (Robin Hughes, a low-budget Svengali with hypnotic eyebrows). Yes, Robin Hughes is the actor who plays the Devil, credited as The Howling Man, in the Twilight Zone‘s “The Howling Man,” Season 2, Episode 5, which aired in 1960. He portrays the mysterious prisoner held by monks, who is revealed through a memorable transformation scene as Satan himself.

Back to the head – Drew’s head that is, separated from his body by Sir Francis Drake, proceeds to telepathically possess ranch guests and staff, who dutifully tote him around.

Highlights include the head’s uncanny ability to hypnotize with a glare, a parade of characters getting possessed faster than you can say “hilarious head in a box horror,” and a climax where the villain’s head is finally reunited with his body, only to be foiled by a fleur-de-lis amulet and a hero who apparently read the script’s last page. The ending is so abrupt you’ll wonder if the editor just got bored and left for lunch, but not before giving us the immortal lesson: The thing that wouldn’t die… actually could, and did, with a little help from some Catholic jewelry.

Both films are like haunted house rides at a county fair- creaky, a little rickety, but full of charm and the kind of scares that are best enjoyed with a bowl of popcorn and a group of wisecracking friends. Whether you’re dodging shrunken heads or ducking a telepathic noggin, these B-movie gems prove that in the world of 1950s horror, the only thing more dangerous than a curse is the set decorator’s imagination!

THE BRAINIAC 1962

Abel Salazar’s turn in The Brainiac/el Baron del Terror 1962 proves that vengeance never looked so delightfully bizarre: a comically monstrous baron (Salazar) returning from the Inquisition’s flames, armed with a forked tongue for brain-sucking and an impeccably grim sense of revenge, proves that in Mexican Gothic horror, even a centuries-old curse can come with a wink and a forked tongue firmly in cheek of campy charm. The Brainiac is so hilariously low-budget and campy and yet somehow grotesquely startling that it’s become an essential part of the movie’s charisma. The monster’s absurd yet iconic presence is somewhere between charmingly ridiculous and endearingly terrifying.

One of my favorite childhood memories of those late-night forays into midnight movies was that split-second jolt I’d get when the Brainiac would lurch onto the screen, clumsily galumphing forward with his lobster-claw hands like a creature sailing in on the tail of a comet streaking across the night sky (which it does!), as if the fiend’s arrival was timed with cosmic mischief and a snap, crackle, suck of ozone!

The Brainiac 1962 evokes an outlandish, almost comical image of hands that look like gastric proton pumps. Quivering squid-fingered suction cup pincers and a big rubber head with bulging empty black eyes, a monstrous sculpted face resembling a cross between an anteater, a fly, and the devil himself, his nose a twisted proboscis like some mosquito spawned from a sci-fi fever dream, jutting out with unnerving prominence. All pointy eared — It isn’t just alien; it’s a bizarre muppet hybrid, both nasty and mesmerizing, like something that crawled out of the shadows of a forgotten puppet show on an alternate dimension’s late-night TV, forever caught between nightmare and carnival and topped off with tufts of wild ratty black hari somewhere between a moody Gothic brooding prince and a 70s garage band’s reject wig.

I was utterly captivated by that fiendish creature, his grotesquely long, flicking tongue, and the surreal image of him delicately, graphically I might add, spooning out brains from a gleaming silver serving dish. It’s one of those rare horror films that, even after all these years, still manages to tickle my sense of wonder and nostalgia. Watching it now is like sinking my spoon into a large bowl of classic horror comfort food, with just the right pinch of camp to keep things deliciously entertaining.

Abel Salazar’s The Brainiac (original Mexican title El Barón del Terror, 1962), directed by Chano Urueta, waltzes across the screen with the campy confidence of a film convinced of its own peculiar greatness. The opening tableau whisks us to Inquisition-era Mexico, where Baron Vitelius d’Estera (Abel Salazar himself, producer and ham in chief), after being subject to a myriad of tortures, is condemned for necromancy and sentenced to fiery doom. But this isn’t your average execution—Vitelius, smoke curling around his theatrical brow, curses the judges and prophesies vengeance when a comet next passes by. Flash forward (tornado-slide style) three centuries to the swinging 1960s, where that very comet ignites the Mexican night sky and drops off our newly reincarnated, vengeance-driven warlock.

In The Brainiac, the lead astronomer is Professor Saturnino Millán, portrayed by Luis Aragón. He is the knowledgeable head of the observatory team vigilantly watching for the comet heralding Baron Vitelius d’Estera’s return from his centuries-old execution, foretold to awaken dark events linked to the Baron’s curse. Their vigilance serves as an early warning symbolizing scientific reason trying to grapple with the transcendental supernatural evil.

Working closely alongside him is Licenciado Francisco Coria, played by Carlos Nieto, who assists with the celestial observations and helps interpret the ominous signs. He is a practical presence at the observatory and is romantically involved with Victoria Contreras, played by Rosa María Gallardo. Victoria Contreras is a direct descendant of Álvaro de Contreras, one of the Inquisitors who condemned Baron Vitelius d’Estera to death, making her a target of the Baron’s vengeful wrath that spans centuries.

Victoria adds a much-needed splash of humanity to this bunch of stargazers, grounding the cosmic freak show with real feelings, because even when you’re chasing a brain-sucking fiend, personal drama insists on sticking around to watch the show.

Professor Millán, his earnest assistant Francisco, and Francisco’s worried fiancée Victoria find themselves reluctantly tangled in Baron Vitelius d’Estera’s sinister web when their scientific watch for the ominous comet unknowingly signals the moment the fiendish Baron bursts back into life, turning their peaceful lives into a showdown between cosmic curiosity and brain-sucking Gothic chaos.

After the fireball crashes near their observatory, the Baron arrives in human guise shortly after the comet lands, encountering the young couple Francisco and Victoria. During this meeting, he impresses them by casually mentioning his skill in astronomy and science, masking his sinister plans. The couple then invites him to visit their mentor, Professor Millán, unwittingly opening the door for Vitelius into the elite scene and beginning his hunt for the descendants of the Inquisitors who condemned him centuries ago. This encounter, pivotal to linking the Baron’s ancient curse with the modern-day victims, sets the stage for the Baron’s eerie blend of charm and menace, allowing him to infiltrate their circle and organize deadly gatherings where his vengeance begins to take physical form.

Someone’s got to keep an eye on the sky, and this observatory trio occupies a crucial narrative space: their anticipation of the comet sets the supernatural clock ticking. The relationship between these characters and Abel Salazar’s Vitelius d’Estera is indirectly adversarial; their scientific search for answers digs a deeper burr hole in the skull, between cold, hard reason and the Baron’s occult madness, linking the celestial to the sinister while Vitelius’ resurrected menace and theatrical villainy sweeps through the city like a Gothic plague.

Baron Vitelius d’Estera assumes the identity and the attire of a contemporary, aristocratic figure, essentially posing as a sophisticated gentleman whose activities revolve around social gatherings, elegant parties, and private visits to the homes of his victims, and his own lavish space, where he infiltrates society and enacts his revenge.

The film delights in the Baron’s transformations, the most gloriously absurd to behold, setting the stage for Vitelius to hunt down the descendants of his accusers.

Enter the modern cast of those descended from the inquistion—dashing Rubén Rojo as Rolando/Marcos Miranda, elegant Rosa María Gallardo as Victoria Contreras and a gallery of other descendant social class blissfully unaware that their glamorous parties are about to become unwitting stages for the infernal marionette’s grisly cerebral sampling.

With each graymatter tonic break—that is, Vitelius ducking away from these dinner parties to snack on brain pâté kept in a silver dish—the Baron picks off his prey, using both his sorcerous mesmerism (to paralyze while he transforms with his delightfully wretched prosthetics.

Detective Inspector/Comandante (David Silva) shuffles after the Baron in a procedural subplot, providing the only semblance of resistance as Mexico City grows increasingly short of its intelligentsia.

Director Chano Urueta’s camera, ably wielded by José Ortiz Ramos, slathers each set with shadows, oversized castle décor, and eerily artificial lighting that only enhances the otherworldly flavor of parody. There’s a gleeful love of the macabre here—the kind that invites laughter as much as (accidental) chills. As a kid, it definitely evokes more cringes out of me when the Baron transforms and suck the brains out of people’s skulls.

Cast and crew gleefully camp it up: Salazar relishes both his sophisticated tailored suits and his menacing rubber-masked marauding; the entire cast seems to be having a blast, Ariadne Welter appears in the role of a bar girl credited as Chica asesinada en restaurant. Like everyone, their earnestness is as endearing as the baron’s tongue is improbable.

Critical voices of the 1960s, when they paid attention, veered between mild bemusement and outright ridicule; the film’s trash masterpiece status was cemented over drive-in and late-night viewings, even as cinema journals found themselves marveling at the monster’s odd sensuality and the script’s bravura disregard for logic.

I’d like to champion—and perhaps even canonize—The Brainiac for its lysergic surrealism, affectionately lauding its unforgettable scenes: the Baron’s hypnotic command over decadent socialites, noirish femmes haunting shadowed streets, a bowl of brains presented with the elegance of a fine pâté, and, of course, the eerily mesmerizing sequences of vampiric brain-sucking horror.

The Brainiac earns its cult favorite status through gloriously absurd moments that blend horror with infectious charm, delighting in deliciously chaotic and monstrous theatrics. If The Brainiac is a horror film, it is one with a deliriously raised eyebrow, triumphantly out of step with the ripening sophistication of 1960s genre films. While Hammer Studios bathed Dracula in Technicolor blood and The Innocents plumbed new psychological depths, Urueta and Salazar embraced the loopy extremes in this particular monster movie with its rubber-faced fiend, Gothic melodrama, and a Baron consumed not only by vengeance, but by a hearty appetite for gray matter and cinematic immortality alike.

The delight is infectious: the more seriously it’s taken, the more outrageously it charms, making it the rare cult favorite where even a damnéd aristocrat, warlock necromancer, and sorcery, can demand a spot at the cocktail party—brains on the menu, of course.

#63 down 87 to go! Your EverLovin Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

A trailer a day keeps the Boogeyman away! The Brainiac or El barón del terror 1962

The Brainiac or El barón del terror 1962

Picture it…1661 Mexico, the Baron Vitelius of Astara has been sentenced to be burned alive at the stake by the Holy Inquisition of Mexico for witchcraft, necromancy, and crimes against nature!

Behold the papery comet!

But as he stands frying in the flames of justice, as in all good revenge/horror films the Baron swears vengeance against the descendants of the Inquisitors.

Now…300 years later, coinciding with a comet that streaks overhead like a fiery paper cut out in all its glory of early special effectiveness, on the night of the Baron’s execution, he is resurrected as a brain-eating fiend that wreaks havoc and brain-sucking retribution on all the descendants of the Inquisitor. Nothing like a steamy pewter serving dish of fresh brains…yum!

Directed by Chano Urueta and starring Abel Salazar (Curse of The Crying Woman 1963, The Vampire 1957)as the Baron Vitelius/Brainiac. Also starring Ariadna Welter and David Silva. A fabulous Mexican Horror film from the 60s that just sort of stays with you…!

“See horrible and insane killings as the Count turns into a monster and seeks his revenge!”

Happy Trailers! MonsterGirl