MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #112 The Psychopath 1966

THE PSYCHOPATH 1966

Let’s talk about The Psychopath (1966), a British psychological thriller that’s equal parts whodunit and wicked dollhouse fever dream. Brought to us by Amicus, an underdog of British horror whose quirky, resourceful spirit turned modest budgets and big imaginations into cult classics that still haunt the genre’s backroads.

If you’ve ever wondered what would happen if Agatha Christie and a particularly mischievous, maniacal toymaker joined forces, this is your answer. The plot is a classic murder mystery on the surface: a string of grisly deaths among a tight-knit group of postwar Englishmen, each victim found with a disturbingly lifelike doll in their image. But don’t be fooled—this isn’t your average drawing-room caper. The dolls aren’t just props; they’re the film’s morbid motif, turning every murder scene into a twisted tableau that’s as cheeky as it is unsettling.

Director Freddie Francis, who knew his way around both a camera and a darkened corner, injects the film with a sly sense of humor and a dash of Grand Guignol. He gives us macabre set-pieces, rain-slicked streets, and a parade of suspicious characters.

Mark Von Sturm, played with unsettling finesse by John Standing, is the film’s pale, wide-eyed enigma—a man-child whose nervous energy and ambiguous charm make him both pitiable and deeply unnerving. He drifts through his mother’s doll-crammed house like a ghost in modish clothes, his dyed blond hair and leather jacket a nod to the swinging London scene, but his soul clearly stranded somewhere much darker. Mark is fiercely devoted to his mother, serving as both caretaker and accomplice in their insular, uncanny world.

There’s a whiff of Norman Bates to him: Mark’s manner is fey, neurotic, and ever-so-slightly off, his conversations peppered with odd affectations and a queasy intimacy that makes every scene he’s in feel just a little too close for comfort. He’s fascinated by abnormal psychology, keeps odd hours as a night watchman, and seems forever caught between boyish obedience and something far more sinister. When he utters, “The dolls and me!” it lands like both a confession and a warning.

Standing’s performance is a balancing act between vulnerability and menace, making Mark as much a victim of his mother’s damaged psyche as he is a potential architect of the film’s macabre crimes. He’s the living embodiment of the film’s twisted innocence: a son forever trapped in his mother’s haunted dollhouse, never quite sure whether he’s the puppet or the puppeteer.

Another character at the heart of The Psychopath is Margaret Johnston as Mrs. Von Sturm, Mark’s mother, a character who glides through the film like a porcelain wraith—equal parts grieving mother and puppet master, her every gesture as precise and chilling as the dolls she so obsessively tends. Johnston’s performance is a study in controlled menace: she cloaks her madness in velvet civility, her voice a lullaby that curdles into threat. With eyes that flicker between sorrow and sly amusement, she becomes both architect and avatar of the film’s twisted games, embodying a kind of maternal malice that is as tragic as it is terrifying. In her hands, villainy is not a blunt instrument but a delicate craft—each murder a macabre keepsake, each doll a silent confession.

Margaret Johnston (Night of the Eagle, aka Burn, Witch, Burn 1962) steals the show as the enigmatic Mrs. Von Sturm, a woman whose maternal instincts are as questionable as her collection of creepy dolls. Patrick Wymark’s Inspector Holloway, meanwhile, tries to keep a stiff upper lip as the bodies (and the dolls) pile up, but you can tell he’s just as creeped out as we are.

The score, by Elisabeth Lutyens, is a quirky cocktail of suspense and whimsy, tiptoeing between menace and mischief. And let’s not forget the film’s sly commentary on repression, guilt, and the secrets that languish until they turn into grand psychosis.

In the grand tradition of British horror, The Psychopath 1966 is both a love letter to and a send-up of the genre’s Gothic roots. It’s a film that winks at you from the shadows, daring you to laugh even as you squirm. So, if you’re in the mood for something that’s equal parts creepy and campy—with a dash of porcelain menace—this quirky little thriller has its unnerving moments, especially its grotesque denouement. No matter how many times I brace myself, that final moment still tears through my defenses—raw, unyielding, and utterly unforgettable.

#112 down, 38 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

The Psychopath 1966 – I Have My Doll Now!

Dolls, with their lifeless gazes, imprint in our collective phobias and on Robert Bloch’s & Amicus’s narrative “” and like clowns, and zombie children– dolls have always given us a dreadful feeling of unease that lingers in our psyche. It’s their dead stare and their cold watchful eyes – like soulless little polymer devils. Cinematographer/ Director Freddie Francis who previously worked at Hammer, makes use of the accursed doppelgänger dolls as macabre iconography. Bloch likely viewed the British-based Amicus as the substantial alternative worth embracing, signing a three-picture deal with Paramount.

Horror filmmakers have explored this causality of jitters for decades. In Amicus’s The Psychopath 1966 – it is the symbology of dolls that gives the film its creepy attraction to what is essentially a crime drama and creative whodunnit with a few unsettling moments while trying to unravel a tale of a homicidal maniac who leaves a unique signature””the very likeness of the victims.

The Psychopath was made midway in the decade, featuring the mellifluous tagline “A New Peak in Shriek.” The film marks Freddie Francis’s foray into colour psycho-thrillers. With its use of vibrant reds, it’s a departure from his previous repertoire of haunting black-and-white psychological horror tales crafted for the illustrious Hammer.

Elisabeth Lutyen’s beautifully carnivalesque score washes over the opening as dismembered doll parts accompany the credits. The film sticks to the classic crime procedural script, but it’s not afraid to paint it with a touch of horror, throwing in the voodoo-like doll motif for that extra dash of macabre flair. It’s your standard crime fare, just with a wicked twist. Bloch’s script presents the crimes using the doll fetish in such a way that remains formulaic, though it does succeed in having a moody impact by the end.

Continue reading “The Psychopath 1966 – I Have My Doll Now!”

A Trailer a Day Keeps the Boogeyman Away! Halloween A-Z

P

Pharaoh’s Curse 1957

Pharaoh’s Curse is a 1957 American horror film directed by Lee Sholem (Tobor the Great and Superman and the Mole Men)

Character actor George N Neise plays the obsessed archaeologist Robert Quentin as part of a team of American archaeologists who unwittingly awaken a three-thousand-year-old ancient curse while excavating the tomb of a Pharaoh that is rumored to be cursed. Unlike the embodiment of the traditional mummy in the Universal franchise, one of the expedition members (Alvaro Guillot) falls prey to the vengeful spirit of the mummy seeking revenge on those who have desecrated his tomb. It needs to feed on fresh blood to sustain itself which makes it more vampiric than a mummified fiend. Rather than its victims being strangled by rotting bandaged hands, they are left with bite marks on their throats and an odd trace of mold on their necks.

The film starts off at a British outpost nestled in the heart of Egypt. An officer receives strict orders to locate an unsanctioned archaeological expedition and compel them to return to Cairo promptly. En route this small contingent of British soldiers crosses paths with an eccentric Egyptian woman who cryptically warns of dire consequences should they fail to halt the expedition in its tracks. But when they arrive at their destination it’s too late. The archaeologists have not only stumbled upon the tomb of the Pharaoh but have also dared to unseal it, unleashing a malevolent force, and one of the expedition members undergoes a ghastly transformation into a creepy old geezer in pajamas resembling a desiccated mummy-like figure that can't seemingly be killed.

Pharaoh’s Curse stars Mark Dana as Captain Storm, Diane Brewster as Sylvia Quentin, Ziva Rodann (Macumba Love 1960) as Simira, Ben Wright, and Terence de Marney as Sgt Smolett.

Paranoiac 1963

Paranoiac is a 1963 as part of British psychological horror film produced by Hammer directed by Freddie Francis and scripted by Jimmy Sangster.

The story centers around the wealthy Ashby family, who reside in a large, secluded mansion on the English coast included are the Ashby siblings, Simon (Oliver Reed) and Eleanor (Janette Scott), who are haunted by the tragic death of their parents in a car crash several years earlier. They live under the care of their guardian, Aunt Harriett (Sheila Burrell).

Many years prior, a tragic car accident claimed the lives of two affluent parents, leaving their three children in the care of an eccentric aunt. However, just a few years later, one of the sons seemingly took his own life, leaving behind a fragile and emotionally unstable daughter and a spoiled, belligerent son who indulges in alcohol, exhibits emotional volatility, and behaves abhorrently in every way imaginable.

The sister, who was never a paragon of mental stability, becomes convinced she has encountered her dead brother, Tony, despite all evidence to the contrary. When Tony (Alexander Davion) unexpectedly resurfaces sometime later, doubt lingers over whether he is truly the lost sibling or a cunning impostor. This unexpected return sends Reed’s character spiraling further into madness, accentuating his already unstable and erratic behavior. Paranoiac co-stars Maurice Denham and Lillian Brousse.

The Psychopath 1966

The Psychopath is a uniquely creative and disturbing British horror offering from Amicus produced by Max J. Rosenberg and Milton Subotsky Released in 1966, it was directed by Freddie Francis with a screenplay by Robert Bloch. The film revolves around a series of gruesome murders that shock the tranquil streets of London. Each victim is found with a doll placed near their lifeless body, bearing a striking resemblance to the deceased and their method of execution.

Beginning with Reinhardt Klermer, a middle-aged amateur violinist is on his way to meet his friends who play together as a chamber quartet when a red car runs him down – repeatedly. The unseen murderer leaves a doll in Klermer’s likeness which even includes a miniature violin case. On the scene is Inspector Holloway portrayed by Patrick Wymark, who takes charge of the investigation and believes the murder is most likely committed by one of Klermer’s ensemble. Until, they too are killed (poisoned, stabbed, and hanged) accompanied by dolls, that are tokens of their death left at the crime scene along with their dead bodies. Holloway discovers that each of the victims had given evidence against a convicted war criminal whose bizarre paralyzed widow (Margaret Johnston -Flora Carr in Night of the Eagle aka Burn, Witch Burn 1962) and her curious son Mark (John Standing) seem likely suspects. Both the queer Von Sturms are collectors of dolls. Also under suspicion are Louise Saville (Judy Huxtable) and her fiance (Donald Loftis), because one of the victims was Louise’s father who did not approve of their getting married. Holloway even finds a doll with his likeness but that doesn’t stop him from getting at the truth.

There are some very effectively creepy moments and the art direction of Von Sturm’s doll-infested house is perfectly macabre. Perhaps there are those who will find this game of cat and mouse giallo cliche but the final scene of the film still causes a shudder in me that still seems to linger. The puzzle is solved but it's nearly an excessively unpleasant revelation that left me with a queasy shudder at the end.

Detective Superintendent Holloway portrayed by Patrick Wymark, takes charge of the investigation, and he soon discovers that the victims are all connected to a past crime. As he delves deeper into the case, he unravels a web of dark demented secrets.

As Holloway races against time to catch the elusive killer, the film keeps the audience on the edge of their seats with its suspenseful atmosphere and a chilling score by composer Elisabeth Lutyens and pulp fiction-style layouts by cinematographer John Wilcox (The Third Man 1949).

The Possession of Joel Delaney 1972

The Possession of Joel Delaney 1972 is an unsettling American horror film directed by Waris Hussein. The movie is often noted for its exploration of supernatural and psychological horror elements, which align with the distinct characteristics of horror films from the early 1970s.

Norah Benson (played by Shirley MacLaine), is a successful career woman living in New York City. Her life takes a disturbing turn when her brother Joel Delaney (played by Perry King) becomes possessed by a malevolent spirit.

Joel, once a gentle and caring family man, starts exhibiting violent and erratic behavior. He begins to speak in a strange and menacing voice, displaying a complete personality change that terrifies Norah. Desperate to understand and help her brother, she delves into the mystery surrounding his possession.

As Norah tries to grapple with her brother’s transformation as she investigates, she uncovers a sinister connection between Joel and a mysterious woman from the city’s underworld named Alvean (played by Lovelady Powell). Alvean seems to hold the key to Joel’s possession and the dark forces at play. Like many horror films of the 1970s, the movie incorporates elements of cultural and social commentary, reflecting the anxieties that arose in that decade of filmmaking.

Phobia 1980

Phobia is a 1980 psychological thriller directed by John Huston and starring Paul Michael Glaser. Glaser plays a psychiatrist Dr. Peter Ross, involved in a radical new therapy and comes under suspicion when his patients are murdered, each according to their individual phobias. The film co-stars John Colicos, Susan Hogan, Patricia Collins, Lisa Langlois, and Alexandra Stewart.

Parents 1989

Parents 1989 is -excuse the pun – a delicious black comedy/social commentary/horror film directed by Bob Balaban. The film’s appropriately bizarre title for its Germany release was ‘Daddy ist ein Kannibale’, or ‘Daddy is a Cannibal!'

The story is set in the 1950s and follows a young boy named Michael Laemle (Brian Madorsk). Michael Laemle is the young and curious protagonist of the film. He’s a sensitive boy who becomes increasingly suspicious of his parents’ behavior. As he unravels the dark secrets of his family, he becomes the audience’s passport into the disturbing world of the Laemle household. Michael’s transformation from innocence to paranoia is a central theme in the film. Sure it's not missed that the surname of the family in this movie is “Laemle”, a likely nod to Carl Laemmle Jr. producer of such horror classics as Frankenstein 1931, Dracula 1931, The Mummy 1932 and The Invisible Man 1933.

He starts to become suspicious of his parents, Nick (Randy Quaid) and Lily (Mary Beth Hurt), as he notices their peculiar behavior. His father works for a meat company, and the family consumes a lot of meat themselves, but Michael suspects that it might not be ordinary Grade-A choice cuts of beef. As he grows increasingly paranoid, he dives deeper into and uncovers disturbing secrets about his parents and their gruesome eating habits. They are cannibalistic murderers.

Parents is a unique and unsettling blend of black comedy and horror that delves into themes of conformity, the American family, and the dark underbelly of suburban life.

It serves as a satirical commentary on the conformist values of 1950s suburban America and portrays a seemingly idyllic family and neighborhood, which hides a disturbing and taboo theme of cannibalism. The film explores the idea that beneath the facade of normalcy, people may be repressing their darker impulses. Parent’s dark humor is at the core essence of Balaban’s film. It finds absurdity in the mundane and macabre doings of the Laemle family’s life. The contrast between the sunny, idyllic facade and the nightmarish truth is skillfully woven into the narrative to evoke simultaneous astonishment and amusement, played for both shocks and laughs. Its unconventional take on suburbia has endeared it to dedicated aficionados of offbeat, cult cinema. The eerie retro visual paintings of 50s American living, photographed by cinematographers Ernest Day and Robin Vidgeon, and the provocative score by Jonathan Elias contribute to the film’s overall sense of unease.

Nick Laemle: Michael, are you ready to behave? I thought I’d tell you a little story? Want to hear a story? I’ll tell you a little story and I want you to shut up until I’m finished.
Michael Laemle: [Tied to a chair by his father] You eat people.
Nick: I’ve been watching you, Michael. You’re an outsider, you’re not like them. You’re like us.
Michael: I don’t love you any more.
Lily Laemle: Yes, you do.
Nick: We’re bound for life, no matter how much you hate us.(as he slowly unties Michael] I’m untying, and when you’re free, you can sit down with us and eat, or you could run outside and shout your little secret to the world. And you know what they’ll do, Michael, hmm? They’ll come here and they’ll burn us. Is that what you want? You want to see them burn your parents?
Lily: Mint jelly?

One of my favorite actors who doesn’t get enough attention is Sandy Dennis. Here she has a supporting role as Millie Dew the school social worker who is worried about Michael’s behavior and is one of the outside figures who begins to sense that something is amiss in the Laemle family.

Many critical essays on Parents delve into its social commentary, particularly its critique of 1950s suburban conformity and the facade of the nuclear family. The film portrays the unsettling idea that beneath the veneer of a perfect suburban family, there may be hidden, disturbing secrets. Some essays examine the psychological horror aspects of the film, focusing on the transformation of the protagonist, Michael, from innocence to paranoia. The Laemle family serves as a metaphor for the anxieties and fears lurking in the American psyche during the 1950s. Parents also challenge traditional gender roles, with the mother, Lily, taking on a more dominant and unsettling role compared to the father, Nick. This inversion of gender expectations adds layers to the film’s exploration of identity and conformity.

This is your EverLovin’ Joey Sayin’ Phew! glad that’s over! Stay tuned for the letter Q unless that gives you the quivers!