MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #113 Psycho 1960 & The Birds 1963

PSYCHO 1960

Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960) is the psycho-sexual thriller that yanked back the shower curtain on our deepest fears and cinema’s darkest secrets and showed us what real terror looks like. It’s the film that peered through the peephole and exposed the dark heart of the genre.

A film that didn’t just change horror, but rewired the DNA of cinema itself. Adapted from Robert Bloch’s 1959 novel, which itself drew chilling inspiration from the real-life crimes of Ed Gein, a Wisconsin serial killer whose crimes were truly disturbing. Psycho takes the seed of true crime and grows it into a nightmarish meditation on identity, repression, the monstrous potential, and the unsettling truth that real darkness can hide just beneath the surface of everyday life, tucked away within the people we’d usually never think twice about.

Part of Psycho’s enduring power lies in what it withholds—the violence is never explicit, but rather implied, allowing our minds to fill in the blanks with something far more unsettling. It’s a testament to Hitchcock’s mastery that, despite the lack of graphic imagery, the film remains so psychologically intense that many still find it too frightening to watch.

Janet Leigh’s Marion Crane, the Hitchcock blonde who didn’t make it out of the film, is our way into the story. On the run after a really bad decision, she starts out as our anchor, our heroine—until Hitchcock does something unheard of. He pulls the rug out from under us, shatters and subverts all narrative expectations with the infamous shower scene, a sequence so meticulously constructed (78 camera setups, 52 cuts in 45 seconds) that it became an instant cinematic legend that even now we can’t stop talking about it.

Psycho kicks off with Marion Crane making a desperate grab for a new life, stealing $40,000 and hitting the road. A rain-soaked detour leads her to the lonely Bates Motel, where she meets the awkward but oddly charming Norman Bates, who loves glasses of milk and stuffing things that were once breathing.

Norman Bates is a lonely caretaker running a rundown motel, totally warped and pretty much broken by his domineering mother. Hitchcock takes those two intersecting characters and, with Anthony Perkins in the role as Norman, gives us something unforgettable. Through his mesmerizing performance, Perkins brings Norman to life as both deeply sympathetic and seriously one of the film’s and historically, cinema’s most enduring and unsettling figures. A young man whose mind is so fractured that you’re never sure if he’s the victim, the villain, or somehow both at once. Norman Bates is not just a monster; he has become one of the first truly unflinching American psychos and anti-heroes, and you can’t help but be drawn in by how human he really is on the surface.

After a tense dinner and a fateful shower, Marion vanishes, leaving her sister, boyfriend, and a persistent private detective to unravel what happened. As they dig deeper, the secrets of the Bates house come spilling out, revealing a shocking truth about Norman and his “mother” that redefines the meaning of horror.

Janet Leigh brings real vulnerability to Marion, while Vera Miles is all grit and determination as her sister Lila—she’s not letting anything go unsolved. Then there’s John Gavin as Sam Loomis, who’s basically the poster boy for stubborn, all-American macho (and honestly, sometimes he’s about as flexible as a brick wall). Martin Balsam’s detective Arbogast rounds things out with his dogged persistence. Together, this cast grounds the film’s surreal terror in raw, relatable humanity. When Marion vanishes without a trace, Lila, Sam, and Arbogast follow her trail to the Bates Motel. There, a watchful house on the hill hints at secrets far darker than they ever imagined. They uncover the chilling truth behind Marion’s disappearance and the twisted mystery of her tragic fate.

Cinematographer John L. Russell’s stark black-and-white visuals are more than an aesthetic choice—they’re a psychological landscape, channeling German Expressionism and film noir to mirror the splintered landscape of Norman’s identity and the film’s themes of duality and concealment. Shadows slice across faces, mirrors double and distort, and the Bates house looms like a Gothic specter over the isolated Motel, every frame charged with dread and ambiguity.

Bernard Herrmann’s score is the film’s nervous system: those shrieking, stabbing strings in the shower scene are as iconic as the images themselves, turning the amplifier up on the violence and anxiety to an almost unbearable pitch. The music’s relentless tension is inseparable from the film’s atmosphere, setting a new standard for how sound and image can conspire to unsettle our nerves.

Psycho didn’t just push the boundaries of violence—a violence rendered through Hitchcock’s art of suggestion and sexuality on screen—it obliterated them, introducing the world to the slasher film and forever altering the way filmmakers approached suspense, character, and narrative structure. It was the birth of the modern American horror genre.

Hitchcock’s masterpiece is more than the sum of its shocks; it’s a study in the darkness that can fester beneath the most ordinary facades, a film that forces us to confront the monsters within and leaves us, decades later, wary of shower curtains and gives every lonely roadside motel a sinister edge and certainly a fear of All-American males with boyish good looks who might just have their mummified mother’s body eternally presiding over the shadows, in the fruit cellar.

THE BIRDS 1963

Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963) is a film where the ordinary turns apocalyptic, and at its center is Tippi Hedren’s Melanie Daniels—a woman whose arrival in the sleepy coastal town of Bodega Bay seems to unleash not just a flock of birds, but the full, terrifying force of female primacy. Melanie is no shrinking violet; she’s glamorous, independent, and unapologetically assertive, a socialite who crosses boundaries and upends the careful order of the Brenner family. Her presence is magnetic and disruptive, and as she steps into this insular community, the natural world itself seems to recoil and revolt.

The film opens with playful flirtation in a San Francisco pet shop, but as Melanie follows Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) to Bodega Bay, the tone shifts. What begins as a mischievous romantic pursuit quickly spirals into chaos when the birds—first a lone gull, then an unstoppable swarm—begin to attack. The violence escalates: children are beset at a birthday party, the town is terrorized, and the Brenner home becomes a fortress under siege. Hitchcock’s mastery is evident in every frame—the famous schoolyard scene, crows gathering with mathematical menace behind Melanie; the relentless assault in the attic, where she is reduced from poised outsider to battered survivor.

But beneath the surface, The Birds is a study in gendered power and social anxiety. Melanie’s arrival disrupts the fragile balance of the Brenner household: Lydia Brenner (Jessica Tandy), the possessive mother, sees her as a threat to her bond with Mitch; Annie Hayworth (Suzanne Pleshette), the schoolteacher and Mitch’s former lover, is collateral damage in the struggle for his attention. (It’s very hard for me to see Annie (or Bob Newhart’s Emily Hartley) lying face down with her beautiful eyes pecked out!) As critics and scholars have noted, the birds themselves become avatars of repressed female energy, latent sexuality, and the chaos that erupts when the established order is challenged.

Melanie’s very presence—her boldness, her beauty, her refusal to be cowed—seems to summon the avian apocalypse, as if the town (and nature itself) cannot contain the force she represents. The film never offers a tidy explanation for the attacks, leaving us to grapple with the possibility that the horror is a response to the threat of female autonomy and desire.

The birds, as related to the Harpies of Greek myth, can be seen as expressions pointing to a psychoanalytic and mythological interpretation of Hitchcock’s The Birds. According to Horowitz, the birds in the film can be seen as symbolic manifestations of the Harpies from Greek mythology: female, bird-like creatures associated with sudden violence, punishment, and the embodiment of destructive feminine energy.

The relentless bird attacks are not just random acts of nature, but are deeply connected to the psychological dynamics in the film, specifically, the jealousy and repressed rage of Lydia Brenner, Mitch’s mother. Lydia is threatened by Melanie Daniels’ arrival and her potential to disrupt the family structure. The Harpies, as mythic figures, were known for “snatching” away and exacting retribution, often representing uncontrollable forces of female anger and vengeance. In the context of the film, the birds become an outward expression of Lydia’s internal turmoil and possessiveness, as well as broader anxieties about female power and autonomy. Horowitz situates the bird attacks as both a mythic and psychological phenomenon, linked to the Harpies’ role as agents of chaos and punishment, and to Lydia’s own emotional state, making the violence in The Birds a metaphor for the eruption of suppressed feminine power and resentment within the narrative.

Hitchcock’s technical innovation is everywhere: the seamless blend of live and mechanical birds, the absence of a traditional musical score replaced by electronic soundscapes and silence, the use of long takes and tracking shots to build suspense. The result is a film that feels both immediate and surreal, a waking nightmare where the familiar becomes uncanny and the safe becomes dangerous and lethal.

The Birds stands as a landmark in cinematic history, not just for its groundbreaking special effects and nerve-shredding suspense, but for its willingness to probe the psychological and social undercurrents of fear.

It helped birth the “nature attacks” subgenre, influencing everything from Jaws to Arachnophobia, but its true legacy lies in its ambiguity and its refusal to offer easy answers. The terror, like Melanie herself, is both alluring and unknowable—a force that cannot be domesticated or explained away.

In the end, as the battered survivors drive out of Bodega Bay, flanked by thousands of silent, watchful birds, we are left with a vision of power—feminine, natural, and utterly ungovernable—waiting just beyond the edge of our ordered lives. The Birds is not just a tale of nature gone mad; it is a meditation on the dangers and desires that simmer beneath the surface, and a reminder that what we fear most may be the very thing we cannot control.

#113 down, 37 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

 

Nature’s Fury Blogathon: Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963) Melanie Daniels as Metaphor: Wanton With Wings-“What are you? I think you’re the cause of all this, I think you’re evil!”

nature27sfury_them

The clever & cheeky Barry of Cinematic Catharsis has summoned this great and powerful idea for a Summer Blogathon! Whether it’s the weather, or giant mutant bugs, blood hungry sharks, large animals run amok, or the elements gone awry–Nature’s Fury can be seen in so many fascinating and awe inspiring feature films and those lovable B movie trends that showcase the natural world in chaos. I immediately thought of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds as it is a film that has stayed burned in my mind since I first saw it as a child. Certain scenes will never lose their power to terrify.

And in celebration of this event, I’ve actually written a song and made a film/music mash up to tribute Tippi Hedren in The Birds, with a montage from the film featuring my song Calling Palundra

iconic scene the running

Hitch birds

“The Birds expresses nature and what it can do, and the dangers of nature. Because there’s no doubt that if the birds did decide, you know, with the millions that they are, to go for everybody’s eyes, then we’d have H.G.Wells Kingdom of the Blind on our hands.”-Alfred Hitchcock

tippi and crow promo shot

“Why are they doing this? They said when you got here, the whole thing started. Who are you? What are You? Where did you come from? I think you’re the cause of all this… I think you’re evil EVIL!” Actress Doreen Lang playing the hysterical mother in the diner!

This tribute video features my special song written just for this blogathon…. Here’s Melanie Daniels & the birds– with my piano vocal accompaniment, ‘Calling Palundra’

The children’s song “Risseldy Rosseldy” heard at the school when the crows began to unite as a gang is the Americanization of an old Scottish folk song called “Wee Cooper O’Fife”

FullSizeRender
Image courtesy of: Jürgen Müller’s colorful Movies of the ’60s

On its face, The Birds can be taken literally as a cautionary tale about the natural world fighting back against the insensitivity & downright barbaric treatment of nature’s children and the environment at the hands of humankind. Is it a tale of simple, unmitigated revenge against the town for the killing of a pigeon? Or is there something more nefarious & psycho-sexual at work? Once you peel back the top layer of the visual narrative, there are multiple metaphors at work.

giphy

From Dark Romance: SEXUALITY IN THE HORROR FILM by David J. Hogan- “Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963) is probably the ultimate expression of this sort of nameless dread. It is a film that cheerfully defies description: it is horror, it is science fiction, it is black comedy, it is a scathing look at our mores and manners. It is a highly sexual film, but in a perversely negativistic way.”

Before the release of The Birds in 1963, Tippi Hedren made the cover of Look Magazine with the heading “Hitchcock’s new Grace Kelly.”

Tippi Hedren in Marnie 1964
Tippi Hedren in Marnie (1964). What Grace Kelly had in pristine beauty and sophistication, Hedren possesses an undertow of sensuality that pulls you into that gorgeous mystique.

As with Hitchcock’s other, worldly beautiful blonde subject — the strong-willed socialite Lisa Carol Fremont (Grace Kelly) in Rear Window (1954) The Birds features the stunning Tippi Hedren as the coy, confident, and a bit manipulative Melanie Daniels a San Fransisco socialite who descends upon Bodega Bay with a similar uncompromising will. Stiff, stolid, and cocky Lawyer Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) meets Melanie in a pet shop where the two share shallow, faintly romantic barbs and repartee. Mitch is shopping for a pair of love birds for his sister Cathy’s eleventh birthday and Mitch pretends in a condescending manner to mistake her for the clerk.  Melanie goes along with the mistaken identity as a way to flirt until his slightly mean-spirited joke backfires when she accidentally lets a canary loose while it lands in an ashtray Mitch throws his hat on it and places it back in its cage smugly saying “Back in your gilded cage Melanie Daniels.” revealing that he not only knew who she was from the very beginning and has quite a snotty preconceived notion about this socialite whom he appears to judge as running with a ‘wild’ crowd and is amoral. He manages to make a bit of a fool out of Melanie. The contrast between the flirty glib and calculating Melanie Daniels and the less interesting, judgemental, and arrogant Mitch Brenner kicks off a chemistry that really isn’t as vital to the story as what the two personalities represent.

CapturFiles_5
As Melanie is about to enter Davidson’s Pet Shop, she hears and sees a tremendous gathering of Seagulls in the sky. It is a foreboding moment of things to come…

Continue reading “Nature’s Fury Blogathon: Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963) Melanie Daniels as Metaphor: Wanton With Wings-“What are you? I think you’re the cause of all this, I think you’re evil!””

Dark Patroons & Hat Box Killers: 2015 The Great Villain Blogathon!

Banner

IT’S HERE AGAIN… THAT TINGLING ON THE BACK OF YOUR NECK BECAUSE THERE’S FOUL DEEDS AND MURDEROUS MACHINATIONS AFOOT…HOSTED BY SPEAKEASYSHADOWS & SATIN… AND SILVER SCREENINGS… THE GREAT VILLAIN BLOGATHON OF 2015!

tumblr_mkl34waubl1qgk6gio1_500

“Sometimes human places, create inhuman monsters.”
“• Stephen King, The Shining

“What would an ocean be without a monster lurking in the dark? It would be like sleep without dreams.”
“• Werner Herzog

“Monsters cannot be announced. One cannot say: ‘Here are our monsters,’ without immediately turning the monsters into pets.”
“• Jacques Derrida

DRAGONWYCK  (1946)

Vincent Price – “I don’t play monsters. I play men besieged by fate and out for revenge…”

vincent price
Vincent Price is perhaps one of THE sexiest men in the film. Eventually, typecast, albeit an icon of the horror film industry… enough of us are aware of his range of talent and his sophisticated manner. If I were to have met him, I would have swooned… and that’s not a lie. He possessed a unique sensuality both tragic and dynamic that just drew you in.

Price could always play ONE of the most cultivated, enigmatic, and beguiling villains at any time…

Dragonwyck
-Secret thoughts… That led to secret love… That led to rapture and terror!-

Gene Tierney as Miranda Wells:Nicholas – you do believe in God?”

Vincent Price as Nicholas Van Ryn: “I believe in myself, and I am answerable to myself! I will not live according to printed mottoes like the directions on a medicine bottle!”

The chemistry between Price and Tierney is authentic and captivating. When Miranda Wells feels humiliated by the gaggle of high-class snobbish debutantes because she’s from the wrong end of the river, not from the Hudson but the Connecticut River bottom, Nicholas tells her she’s better than all of them and asks her to dance. He seems so gentle and human, but he has a dark and villainous side!

CapturFiles_52 You couldn't help yourself any more than I
“You couldn’t help yourself any more than I” – Nicholas.

CapturFiles_39

CapturFiles_40 what makes you think you're so much better than I am
“What makes you think you’re so much better than I am!”

DRAGONWYCK 1946 was Vincent Price’s 18th film. He had previously appeared in The House of the Seven Gables 1940 as Shelby Carpenter opposite Gene Tierney in Laura 1944 and Leave Her to Heaven 1945, right after he appeared as the cold-blooded Dr. Richard Cross in Shock 1946.

Produced by Ernst Lubitsch uncredited and overseen by one of my favs– Writer/Director Joseph L Mankiewicz. This Gothic & dark romance is based on the novel by Anya Seton, with cinematography by Arthur C. Miller (The Ox Bow Incident 1943, The Razor’s Edge 1946, Whirlpool 1949, The Prowler 1951), Art Direction by Lyle Wheeler and Russell Spencer, Set Direction by the great Thomas Little. The lighting alone is a mixture of noir chiaroscuro and offers dramatic shadings of the best classical elements of horror. The narrative speaks of familial secrets and twisted vengefulness, not unlike Lewis Allen’s spooky debut masterpiece, The Uninvited 1944.

CapturFiles_84

CapturFiles_33

Added to the moodiness is the eerily haunting score by Alfred Newman with Orchestral arrangements by Edward B Powell. Edited by the keen eyes of Dorothy Spencer (Stagecoach 1939, The House Across the Bay 1940, Lifeboat 1944, The Ghost and Mrs.Muir, The Snake Pit 1948).

Costumes by Rene Hubert and Makeup by Ben Nye. The film bears shades of  Hitchcock/de Maurier’s Rebecca 1940 and Robert Stevenson’s/Charlotte Brontë Jane Eyre 1943. Even a bit of de Maurier’s tautly suspenseful My Cousin Rachel 1952 directed by Henry Koster and starring Olivia de Havilland and Richard Burton. The book is a hell of a good read if you enjoy Gothic melodrama.

Gene Tierney and Vincent Price reunite after having appeared in Otto Preminger’s memorable film noir masterpiece, Laura, in 1944.

Annex - Tierney, Gene (Laura)_05
Otto Preminger brings together these two fine actors in his noir masterpiece Laura 1944.

Here-Gene Tierney plays Miranda Wells, and Walter Huston is her devoutly Christian working-class father-Ephram Wells.

CapturFiles_5 reading from the bible
Walter Huston as Ephram Wells reading from his bible to Miranda.
CapturFiles_6 I thought so it's got spirits in it. A little bit. Even a little bit of evil cannot be good Mirdanda
Miranda takes a drink of wine. Her father reproaches her-“I thought so, it’s got spirits in it. A little bit. Even a little bit of evil cannot be good Miranda”– Her stifling life with her religious father pushes her further into the arms of Nicholas Van Ryn.

This scene foreshadows the dangerous path Miranda is willing to wander through, as she starts to break free of her puritanical upbringing and reach for a life of being a free spirit. Believing that Nicholas represents that freedom. But there is a hint of evil that her father can sense.

Vincent Price once again manifests a passionate yet conflicted antagonist Nicholas Van Ryn with a magnetism you cannot escape, yet you may despise his cruelty and his self-indulgent murderous arrogance.

CapturFiles_52 I must not feel like my life is finished as long as you are with me
“I must not feel like my life is finished as long as you are with me”-Nicholas
CapturFiles_41 You must never be afraid when you're with me Miranda
“You must never be afraid when you’re with me, Miranda.”

CapturFiles_58

Glenn Langan is the handsome yet vanilla Dr Jeff Turner, Anne Revere adds a depth of nurture as Abigail Wells-Miranda’s mother who is weary of her daughter’s intentions to marry such a powerful man.

CapturFiles_56

Spring Byington is one of the maids-Magda. Connie Marshall is the young melancholy Katrina Van Ryn, Henry Morgan is Bleeker one of the farmers who challenges Van Ryn and fights back against the antiquated laws.

Vivienne Osborne plays wife Johanna Van Ryn. Jessica Tandy gives a marvelous performance as Miranda’s maid the feisty Peggy O’Malley. Trudy Marshall is Elizabeth Van Borden. Reinhold Schunzel is Count de Grenier, Jane Nigh is Tabitha. Ruth Ford is Cornelia Van Borden, David Ballard is Obadiah. Scott Elliot is Tom Wells and Boyd Irwin is Tompkins.

DRAGONWYCK 1946 is a Gothic suspense melodrama in the grand classical style. It even brushes against the edges of the classic horror film, not only because of the way it’s filmed, but there are certain disturbing elements to the story. The shadows and darkness that are part of the psychological climate work are almost reminiscent of a Val Lewton piece. There’s even a pale reference to that of a ghost story that is concealed, or I should say unrevealed, with the first Mrs.Van Ryn’s spirit playing the harpsichord, and the eerie phantom chords that add to the mystery and gloom that hang over the manor house.

CapturFiles_48 I don't like it now The singing's getting louder now, I'm afraid I'm afraid
Katrine-“I don’t like it now. The singing’s getting louder now, I’m afraid, I’m afraid.”

Ghostly Dragonwyck

With swells of atmospheric tension and darkly embroidered romance, there are just the right tinges of shadows and danger. This lush and fervent tale combines tragic Gothic romantic melodrama with the legitimate themes of social class struggle wrapped within dark secrets and suspense.

As always, Price conveys tragic pathos even as the story’s villain. He is a man who manifests layers upon layers of feeling: brooding, charming, sensual, intellectual, menacing, passionate, conflicted, self-loathing, and egomaniacal all at once.

One of my favorite roles will always be his embodiment of Corman/Poe’s Roderick Usher in House of Usher 1960.

Vincent Price in House of Usher, 1960.

CapturFiles_10

CapturFiles_11

The film also offers us the sublime acting skill and divine beauty of Gene Tierney as the heroine or damsel in peril, a simple farm girl living near Greenwich, Connecticut. She dreams of the finer things in life, swept up by the allure of a fairy tale existence, only to find out that her dream has become a nightmare.

CapturFiles_1 copy

Once Miranda receives a letter inviting her to come and visit Dragonwyck, she is perhaps at once young and naive when she arrives at the austere place to be a companion to Van Ryn’s despondent daughter Katrine, a lonely sort of isolated child. First triangulated by Van Ryn’s over-indulgent wife, Johanna, after her death, the two begin a whirlwind romance that leads Miranda to marry the imposing Nicholas Van Ryn.

Almost in the style of a Universal monster movie, the central focus is the mysterious mansion, surrounded by volatile thunderstorms and restless villagers who want to take action against their oppressors. The film works as a period piece, seeming to possess an added heaviness due to the provincial settings and underpinnings of class unrest, which lends itself to the bleak mood.

CapturFiles_55

CapturFiles_4

CapturFiles_35

DRAGONWYCK’s villain or very human boogeyman is the inimitable and urbane Vincent Price, who holds sway over the locals as the patroon—lord of the land, as well as master of all he surveys and, of course, his new wife. Driven by his obsession with having a son, he is a brooding dark figure whose descent into drug-addicted madness comes to light like a demon who has escaped from a bottle.

CapturFiles_88 Neitzche quote here

Nietzsche quote

Van Ryn is vain and contemptuous, scornful, condescending, and cruel. Eventually driven by his immense pride, love, and desire to murder his first wife, who is in the way of his ultimate legacy.

DRAGONWYCK is an interesting film that belies any one genre. As I’ve pointed out, beyond the dark melodramatic suspense elements, it’s every bit a horror film. It is also Joseph L. Mankiewicz’s directorial debut.

Ghost Story

It was set during the nineteenth century when parts of New York were still founded as feudal estates. It’s a fascinating portrayal of the history of the 19th-century Upstate New York Dutch colonies and their struggles between the rich and poor against the reigning yet dying tradition of aristocratic rule over the small family farms, which were overseen by Patroons. A Patroon owns the large land grants along the Hudson River. They are descendants of the original Dutch patrons, “and they’re terribly rich and elegant.” –Miranda.

Yet, as in the case of Nicholas, they can be brutal and self-opportunistic landlords who collect the rent from these hard-working, exploited, and poor farmers.

This is what first impresses Miranda about Nicholas, his power and station in life. Her sister Tibby tells her she’s not anxious to leave home.

CapturFiles_2 copy

Miranda says, “That’s not fair, you know that I love you and Pa, all of you, and my home, it’s just that I try to be like everyone else, and want what I’m supposed to want. But then I start thinking about people I’ve never known and places I’ve never been. Maybe if the letter hadn’t come, I’d. Oh, I don’t know, I must be loony.”

Nicholas Van Ryn is a brooding and powerful aristocratic patroon who runs all matters with an iron hand. In the Nineteenth Century, the upstate New York counties were still dealing with a system run by these Patroons. There began a social uprising of the surrounding farmers who wanted more power over their land and a rule that would abolish the aristocracy that was a tribute to a dying past practice. Soon there would be an end to these ruling Estates.

As seen in Van Ryn’s maniacal demonstration of his being seated in an elaborate throne, he remains poised while collecting the farmer’s rent. Henry Morgan plays the tough and prideful farmer Klaus, who has brought nothing with him. “Not rent– nor tribute.”

CapturFiles_36

CapturFiles_37

CapturFiles_38 I'm a free citizen I take my hat off for no one
“I’m a free citizen, I take my hat off for no one.”

When Nicholas’s first wife cannot bear him a son as heir to carry on the Van Ryn name, the wealthy and wicked Nicholas Van Ryn secretly plans to poison her with the help of an Oleander plant. Setting his sights on the younger, more beautiful cousin Miranda.

Oleander

He then invites Miranda (Gene Tierney just naturally exudes a uniquely dreamy-eyed splendor) to come and visit Dragonwyck. She is an innocent girl fascinated by the urbane Nicholas but by the film’s climax, she becomes entrapped in the foreboding and bleak atmosphere of Dragonwyck, a place of secrets, sadness, and insanity.

CapturFiles_13
Nicholas-“The Breeze must feel wonderful indeed on a face as beautiful as yours, I imagine.”

Miranda is so taken with the idea of dancing the waltz and how fine a gentleman cousin Nicholas seems. Her father always reads passages from the Bible, and she hungers for adventure. Miranda craves the freedom to experience a better life.

CapturFiles_15

Vincent Price is incredibly handsome as Nicholas. Mysterious, his deep blue eyes crystallize through the stark black and white film. He has a strong jawline, and possesses vitality”¦ at first, he is so charming. Nicholas-“The Breeze must feel wonderful indeed on a face as beautiful as yours, I imagine.”

CapturFiles_16

The first meal at Dragonwyck is a grotesque scene in which his wife Johanna (Vivienne Osborne) shows herself to be a lugubrious sow, a glutton, and a spoiled child who now bores and disgusts her husband. He tells Miranda, “To my wife, promptness at meals is the greatest human virtue.” 

Nicholas is already starting to reveal his cutting tongue by commenting on how his wife overeats and is not refined—a hint of his cruel nature.

CapturFiles_18 I think I'll have the bon bons before going to bed
“I think I’ll have the bonbons before going to bed.”
CapturFiles_18
Look at the detail of this frame. It’s almost the perfection of a Late 19th-century painting.

CapturFiles_21

CapturFiles_20

CapturFiles_19
Miranda meets the despondent Katrine, a hapless child.

At dinner, Johanna begins to nag him about bringing home the pastries from New York, the Napoleons, she appears to be a glutton, and though very pretty, a most unattractive portrayal of her character is given for the narrative’s purpose of Nicholas justifiably ridding himself of her so that he might pursue Miranda. In contrast to Johanna’s piggishness, Miranda is given a clear bowl of broth for her supper. The scene is set up so we feel a bit of sympathy toward Nicholas.

As Johanna shoves another bonbon into her mouth…

CapturFiles_17

CapturFiles_24

Cinematographer Arthur C. Miller frames the shot as Johanna is placed in between Nicholas and Miranda. His wife Johanna appears like a fairy tale character–the over-exaggerated plump wife who gorges herself on sweets while Nicholas and Miranda talk of love and loss. Miranda is wildly curious. He is withdrawn and pensive.

CapturFiles_27

CapturFiles_28

CapturFiles_29

CapturFiles_30

Nicholas plays the harpsichord. Miranda listens contentedly and then asks who the woman in the painting is. He tells her it’s his grandmother Aziel –“That’s a strange name” she looks like a frightened child.”

Miranda asks him to tell her more about his grandmother. Was it love at first sight?

Nicholas-“No Van Ryn does anything at first sight.” Miranda-“Oh, but she must have been happy to live here.” Miranda smiles, her face glowing. Nicholas adds, “As it turned out it didn’t matter, soon after her son was born she died. She brought this harpsichord with her from her home. She played it always.”

Johanna: “If you listen to the servants, they’ll have you believe she still does!” she laughs. But Nicholas quickly turns around to look at her. A dark shadow creeps along his brow, and his eyes raise.

Nicholas-“Fortunately, we don’t listen to either the servants or their superstitions.”

CapturFiles_31

CapturFiles_34

Magda (Spring Byington) tells Miranda about Nicholas’ grandmother from New Orleans, the woman in the portrait. That his grandfather never loved her, he never wanted her at all. He wanted their son. he kept her from him… He forbade her to sing and play. He broke her heart. And drove her.” Magda stops short”. “She prayed for disaster to come to the Van Ryns and she swore that when it came she’d always be here to sing and play”¦ She killed herself in this room.”

Magda asks-“Miss Wells, why have you come here? Do you think Katrine is in need of a companion? Miranda answers her, “Well, that would be for her father and her mother to decide.”
Magda says, “Don’t you think she’s in need of a father and a mother”¦ that was a silly question wasn’t it?”

The meddling maid pierces Miranda’s innocence with her honesty like venom–causing a bit of shock on Miranda’s face that usually seems as tranquil as a quiet lake of sparkling water.

“You like it here?” Miranda answers–“Of course, I do.” Magda comments- “Course you do, you like being waited on, I could see tonight it was the first time. You like peaches out of season. You like the feel of silk sheets against your young body. Then one day, with all your heart, you’ll wish you’d never come to Dragonwyck.”

The handsome young Dr. Turner (Glenn Langan) comes to take care of Johanna, who has taken to her bed.

CapturFiles_44

He and Miranda sit and talk by the fire. He tries to imply that living at Dragonwyck has changed her, he tells her that the last time he met her he felt like they had so much in common. “Frankly right now I doubt you have any idea about the slightest thing to talk to me about.”

Johanna’s illness gets worse, of course, we know Nicholas has poisoned her. Lying in bed, she tells him that sometimes she thinks he hates her, but asks if they can go away together once she’s better. He says yes because he knows she’ll never get better. In fact, she will never leave that bed alive.

CapturFiles_42

Continue reading “Dark Patroons & Hat Box Killers: 2015 The Great Villain Blogathon!”