MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #72 Homebodies 1974

HOMEBODIES 1974

A Trailer a Day Keeps the Boogeyman Away! Homebodies (1974) Do You Know Where Your Grandmother Is Tonight?

Homebodies (1974) is an off-beat gem in the annals of psychological horror and black comedy, a film that turns the tables on expectations by making a group of elderly tenants the unlikely- and unnervingly effective- antagonists.

Directed by Larry Yust and beautifully shot by Isidore Mankofsky, the film unfolds in the decaying tenements of Cincinnati, where a handful of pensioners face eviction and the demolition of the only home they’ve ever known. What begins as a melancholy meditation on aging and displacement quickly warps into a darkly comic killing spree, as the residents, played with sly wit and pathos by Paula Trueman, Ian Wolfe, Ruth McDevitt, Peter Brocco, and others, resort to murder to protect their building from developers.

The horror here is as much social as it is psychological: Yust lingers on the loneliness, eccentricities, and quiet desperation of his characters, grounding their bizarre actions in real fears of abandonment and irrelevance. Yet the film’s tone is anything but dour. With a wicked sense of humor, Homebodies delights in the resourcefulness and cunning of its elderly ensemble, whether they’re sabotaging construction sites, pushing a corpse in a wheelchair down a sloping sidewalk, or dispatching a land developer with a cement bath and a fire axe. Paula Trueman’s Mattie, with her twinkling eyes and impish smile, is both lovable and chilling as the ringleader- her presence alone enough to make you look twice at the sweet old lady next door.

Standout moments abound: the opening scene, where Mattie snacks on prunes while watching a construction worker plummet to his death-a mishap she helped orchestrate; the macabre ingenuity of hiding a body in cement, only to discover a foot sticking out, solved with a handy axe; and the film’s quietly menacing chase sequence, where the slow pace and frailty of the characters only heighten the tension and surreal humor. Isidore Mankofsky’s cinematography gives the tenements a stately, almost haunted quality, while the playful score by Bernardo Segall underscores the film’s uneasy balance between comedy and horror. Mankofsky shot a wide range of films as director of photography. In addition to The Muppet Movie (1979), Somewhere in Time (1980), and Better Off Dead (1985), his notable credits include The Jazz Singer (1980), Scream Blacula Scream (1973), One Crazy Summer (1986), and the television movie The Burning Bed (1984), widely regarded as a career-defining, transformative turn for Farrah Fawcett that was – raw, harrowing, and a deeply empathetic role. As Francine Hughes, Fawcett shed her glamorous image to deliver a portrayal that conveyed the terror, exhaustion, and quiet resilience of a woman trapped in an abusive marriage.

Homebodies is a singular entry in the genre- a black comedy with a sting, a horror film that’s both deeply menacing and oddly endearing, and a pointed commentary on how society discards its elders. Its off-beat charm and subversive wit make it a cult classic worth rediscovering, proof that sometimes the most unassuming faces can hide the darkest intentions, though it hangs its hat on self-preservation.

#72 down, 78 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #71 Hatchet for the Honeymoon 1970

HATCHET FOR THE HONEYMOON 1970

Mario Bava, with his painter’s eye and visionary command of light and shadow, ignited the Giallo movement, setting the genre ablaze with a single spark- his films announcing, in vivid color and suspense, that Italian horror had found its most stylish and enduring form.

Bava’s Hatchet for the Honeymoon (1970) is a deliriously stylish entry in the Giallo canon, one that gleefully blurs the lines between slasher, supernatural thriller, and black comedy. The film opens with John Harrington (Stephen Forsyth), a suave yet deeply disturbed bridal fashion designer in Paris, who moonlights as a serial killer of brides. Bava wastes no time revealing John’s psychosis: through voiceover, John confesses his compulsion to murder, each killing bringing him closer to unlocking a traumatic childhood memory. Rather than a whodunit, the film is a “whydunit,” with the audience invited to inhabit John’s fractured mind as he stalks his prey through a world of mannequins, mirrors, and bridal veils.

The cast is led by Forsyth, whose cool detachment and insouciant narration create a chilling, almost camp contrast to his character’s escalating madness. Laura Betti is unforgettable as Mildred, John’s imperious wife- her performance as the scornful, ghostly antagonist is as sharp as the titular hatchet. Dagmar Lassander’s Helen, the clever new model who becomes both love interest and nemesis, rounds out the triangle with wit and poise.

Mario Bava served as both director and cinematographer for Hatchet for the Honeymoon, showcasing his signature visual style. However, Antonio Rinaldi, who is credited as a camera operator on the film, also had a notable career as a cinematographer in Italian genre cinema. Rinaldi worked on several other prominent films, particularly within the horror and thriller genres. His credits include serving as director of photography for Planet of the Vampires (1965), Danger: Diabolik (1968), Kill, Baby… Kill! (1966), Five Dolls for an August Moon (1970), and Baron Blood (1972). He also contributed to Four Times That Night (1971) and Roy Colt & Winchester Jack (1970), often collaborating with directors like Mario Bava.

Bava’s direction is a bravura showcase of his many talents: the film is awash in vivid colors, kaleidoscopic lighting, and inventive camera work. Cinematographer Antonio Rinaldi’s lens transforms the bridal salon and John’s secret mannequin-filled lair into surreal, haunted spaces, where beauty and horror intermingle. Bava’s signature zooms and haptic close-ups heighten the tension, while the soundtrack pulses with an off-kilter energy, underscoring the film’s macabre humor and dreamlike tone.

One scene in Hatchet for the Honeymoon that particularly stands out is when John Harrington lures model Alice into his secret mannequin-filled lair. There, among bridal gowns and eerie, lifeless figures, he invites her to choose a wedding dress as if the night truly belonged to them. They dance together in a surreal, unsettling waltz, blurring the line between romance and horror. As Alice, dressed as a bride, pauses and stands motionless, she eerily resembles one of the mannequins- a chilling visual that is at the soul of Bava’s blend of beauty and dread. The moment is heightened by the film’s lush, romantic score, and the tension culminates as John raises his cleaver, delivering one of the film’s most haunting and unforgettable sequences.

In a dimly lit atelier, John’s voice drifts like a haunting melody, confessing his fractured psyche amidst mannequins draped in bridal veils. Shadows dance on the walls, mirroring the shattered shards of his mind as he reveals the dark compulsion that binds him. A surreal ballet of death unfolds beneath the sterile glow of the salon lights, where pristine white gowns become ghostly shrouds and the camera glides through mirrors and mannequins, capturing the eerie stillness before violence erupts into a macabre dance choreographed by madness. In the twilight haze of the mansion, Mildred’s spectral form drifts like a whisper through the corridors, her presence a chilling echo of vengeance as the veil between life and death shimmers with eerie light. Under a kaleidoscopic swirl of colored lights, John’s facade finally crumbles; his eyes flicker with madness as reality fractures, bridal mannequins looming like silent witnesses to his descent- a carnival of horror and beauty entwined in a deadly embrace.

What sets Hatchet for the Honeymoon apart within both horror and Giallo is its willingness to embrace the irrational and the supernatural. The film’s second half veers into ghost story territory, with Mildred returning to torment John after her murder- a twist that’s both darkly funny and genuinely unsettling. Bava’s playful approach to genre conventions is evident throughout: he references Psycho with John donning a bridal veil, and he subverts audience expectations by making the killer’s unraveling the true mystery.

Though initially overlooked, the film’s reputation has grown, recognized for its prophetic take on the charismatic psychopath-a lineage that leads to modern horror like American Psycho 2001 and beyond. Hatchet for the Honeymoon is less about body count than atmosphere, psychological unease, and Bava’s visual wit. It’s a film where horror is as much in the mind as on the screen, and the final punishment is as poetic as it is inevitable. In the end, Bava’s Giallo is a haunted house of mirrors, stylish, perverse, and wickedly entertaining.

#71 down, 79 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #70 THE GHOUL 1933 & THE OLD DARK HOUSE 1932

THE GHOUL 1933

1933: Boris Karloff (1887-1969) and Ernest Thesiger (1879-1961) star in the horror film ‘The Ghoul’, directed by T Hayes Hunter for Gaumont. (Photo by Margaret Chute/Getty Images).

If you’ve never seen The Ghoul from 1933, it’s a fascinating artifact and kind of a hidden gem from the early days of British horror. It sits somewhere between the shadowy intersection of Universal’s Gothic tradition and the emerging sensibility of British cinema.

Directed by T. Hayes Hunter and produced by Michael Balcon for Gaumont-British, The Ghoul draws heavily on the visual and thematic language of Universal’s The Mummy and Frankenstein, not least because it stars Boris Karloff, right after making his mark in Hollywood with those legendary American horror classics-so you can really feel that same eerie magic he brought to Frankenstein and The Mummy still hanging in the air.

While it borrows liberally from its Hollywood predecessors, the film carves out its own identity through a blend of expressionist atmosphere, British eccentricity, and a uniquely morbid sense of humor and weird charm. And honestly, watching Karloff lumber around as a vengeful, jewel-obsessed Egyptologist is a big part of the appeal.

The story follows Professor Henry Morlant (Karloff), a wealthy Egyptologist who is terminally ill, now facing the end of his life, and is obsessed with the promise of immortality. Morlant is convinced that if he’s buried with a mystical Egyptian jewel called the “Eternal Light,” and offers it to Anubis, the god of the dead, he’ll be granted the existence of a flame that never dies.

On his deathbed, Morlant gives strict instructions to his servant Laing (Ernest Thesiger) to ensure the jewel is placed in his hand before burial. However, greed and intrigue quickly unravel these plans: Laing, as well as Morlant’s lawyer Broughton (Cedric Hardwicke), his nephew Ralph (Anthony Bushell), and a host of other opportunists all scheme to claim the jewel for themselves.

After Morlant’s death, the jewel is stolen from his tomb, and true to his curse-laden warning, he rises from the grave as a vengeful, hulking ghoul, stalking the shadowy halls of his mansion to reclaim his prize and punish the living.

Karloff’s performance, though more limited in dialogue and screen time than his American roles, is nonetheless a grotesque and menacing presence- his makeup and physicality echoing both the Frankenstein monster and Imhotep, yet with a peculiarly British twist of pathos and dark humor. The supporting cast is a veritable who’s who of British stage and screen: Ernest Thesiger is a standout as the scheming, nervy Laing; Cedric Hardwicke brings seriousness and ambiguity to Broughton; and a young Ralph Richardson makes his screen debut as the hapless Ralph Morlant.

Visually, The Ghoul is a triumph in suffocating atmosphere, always tinged with an undercurrent of dread. Cinematographer Günther Krampf- legendary for his work on expressionist masterpieces like Nosferatu 1922 and The Hands of Orlac 1924 – gives the film a moody, shadow-laden look. Alfred Junge’s set design is just as striking: the Morlant mansion is transformed into a mausoleum of secrets and superstition, its winding corridors, Egyptian relics, and flickering candlelight — all these elements contribute to the sustained sense of menace and unreality. The result is a film where every detail, from the lighting to the décor, conspires to keep you delightfully unsettled.

The funeral procession and tomb sequences are particularly evocative, marrying British Gothic with the exotic trappings of Egyptomania that gripped the West in the wake of the Tutankhamun discovery.

Despite its visual strengths and Karloff’s star power, The Ghoul was met with mixed critical reception upon release. Contemporary reviewers noted its derivative qualities and uneven pacing, with some lamenting that Karloff was underused, relegated to mostly mute, lumbering scenes rather than the nuanced menace of his earlier roles.

Nevertheless, the film’s reputation has grown over time, especially after it was rediscovered in the late 1960s following decades as a “lost” film. Today, it is appreciated for its eerie set pieces, its blend of horror and black comedy, and its place as the first British film to receive an ‘H’ certificate for “Horrific” content.

The Ghoul occupies a unique place in horror history. It stands as both an homage to and a reinvention of the Universal horror template, filtered through the lens of British wit, class anxiety, and a fascination with the supernatural. Its influence can be seen in later British horror, especially in the atmospheric, character-driven films of Hammer Studios. While it may not possess the relentless thrills of its American counterparts, its slow-burning dread, expressionist visuals, and Karloff’s spectral presence ensure its legacy as a minor classic- a half-remembered nightmare, equal parts macabre and mischievous.

THE OLD DARK HOUSE 1932

I’d like to do a more extensive overview of The Old Dark House because it’s a film that rewards close attention and deserves a deeper appreciation. James Whale’s direction and the film’s remarkable cast create a unique blend of horror, black comedy, and social satire that helps it to stand out amidst other early genre films. Its eccentric characters, razor-sharp wit, and atmospheric visuals not only established the template for the “old dark house” subgenre but also offer surprisingly modern commentary on class, gender, and identity. Each viewing reveals new layers- whether it’s the sly humor, the satirical edge, or the interplay between menace and absurdity. Exploring the film in depth at The Last Drive In would give me a chance to highlight its lasting influence, inventive spirit, and the reasons it remains such a fascinating and entertaining classic.

James Whale’s The Old Dark House (1932) unfolds like a storm-battered night of Gothic excess, where horror and morbidly humorous social commentary mingle beneath a crumbling roof amidst decaying aristocracy and existential dread.

The film opens with three travelers-Philip and Margaret Waverton (Raymond Massey and Gloria Stuart) and their acerbic friend Roger Penderel (Melvyn Douglas)-stranded by Welsh torrential rain and forced to seek refuge in the eerie Femm mansion.

Inside, they are greeted by a parade of unforgettable characters: a gallery of grotesques; Horace Femm (Ernest Thesiger), a twitchy aesthete clutching a gin bottle. His sister Rebecca (Eva Moore), a religious fanatic who fondles Margaret’s dress while muttering about rot and whose fixation on sin is as chilling as the storm outside; and Morgan (Boris Karloff), the imposing, scarred mute butler whose unpredictable violence simmers just below the surface, his drunken rages threaten to upend the night.

As the night wears on and more wayfarers arrive-boisterous industrialist Sir William Porterhouse (Charles Laughton) and his chorus-girl companion Gladys (Lilian Bond)-the house’s secrets begin to unravel, leading to the escape of Saul Femm (Brember Wills), a pyromaniac locked away in the attic whose presence with his manic cackling and biblical ravings ignites the film’s chaotic climax.

Whale, fresh off Frankenstein (1931), infuses the film with his signature blend of macabre wit and visual flair. His direction transforms Priestley’s novel Benighted, a critique of post-war British class decay, into a sly, subversive comedy of manners. The Femms, with their moth-eaten gentility and repressed vices, embody a dying aristocracy, while the travelers- a mix of disillusioned veterans and social climbers- reflect the era’s shifting hierarchies. Whale’s dark humor pulses through scenes like Horace’s deadpan offer of “Have a potato” as chaos erupts, or Rebecca’s gnarled fingers tracing Margaret’s décolletage as she hisses, “Finer stuff still, but it’ll rot too!”

This tonal balancing act, where terror and absurdity coexist, would later define classics like The Bride of Frankenstein (1935).

The cast delivers performances steeped in theatricality and nuance. Karloff, though top-billed, subverts his “monster” persona as Morgan, a hulking caretaker whose loyalty to the Femms masks a volatile fragility. Thesiger’s Horace-all nervous giggles and darting eyes-steals scenes with his campy decadence, while Moore’s Rebecca channels Puritanical fury into a grotesque parody of maternal authority. Laughton and Bond, as the outsiders, inject pathos: Porterhouse’s bluster hides grief over his late wife, while Gladys’s gold-digging pragmatism (“He doesn’t expect anything… you know”) masks a yearning for stability.

Even the mansion itself becomes a character, thanks to Charles D. Hall’s labyrinthine set design- a Gothic funhouse of winding staircases, leering gargoyles, and shadow-drenched halls where firelight flickers like a dying pulse.

Cinematographer Arthur Edeson (later of Casablanca) bathes the film in expressionist chiaroscuro, with shadows pooling in the hollows of Karloff’s scarred face and candlelight casting grotesque distortions on the walls. One standout sequence- Rebecca berating Margaret in a warped mirror, her face contorted beside the motto “God is Not Mocked”-epitomizes the film’s visual inventiveness.

The production’s $250,000 budget funded these lavish details, though contemporary critics dismissed the film as a “theatrical curio”. Modern reassessments, however, hail it as a blueprint for haunted-house tropes- the stormy night, the locked room, the dysfunctional family- that would inspire everything from The Cat and the Canary 1939, The Uninvited 1944, and The Spiral Staircase 1946.

Beneath its genre trappings, The Old Dark House simmers with post-War disillusionment. Penderel, a veteran adrift in peacetime, embodies the Lost Generation’s angst, while Saul’s pyromania mirrors Europe’s smoldering instability. Whale, himself a WWI veteran, layers these themes with a queer subtext: Horace’s flamboyant cowardice and Porterhouse’s ambiguous relationship with Gladys hint at identities stifled by societal norms.

Even Karloff’s Morgan, working-class brute trapped serving a decadent family, hints at class resentment, a theme Priestley would later amplify in An Inspector Calls.

The film’s 1932 release, sandwiched between pre-Code permissiveness and looming Hays Code censorship, allowed Whale to push boundaries, whether in Rebecca’s lurid diatribes or Gladys and Horace’s coded sexuality.

Though it flopped initially, its restoration in 2017 revealed Edeson’s visuals in stark clarity, from the mud-slicked landslide to Saul’s final, flaming descent. Karloff, ever the professional, reportedly relished playing against type, calling Morgan “a departure from the poetic horror of Frankenstein.”

Today, The Old Dark House stands as a masterclass in tonal audacity- a film where laughter and dread coil together like smoke from a dying fire.

#70 down, 80 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #69 GOODBYE GEMINI 1970

GOODBYE GEMINI 1970

SPOILER ALERT!

Goodbye Gemini (1970) is a feverish, kaleidoscopic plunge into the dark side of Swinging London, a film that fuses the era’s psychedelic excess with a twisted psycho-sexual horror that still feels transgressive and strange. Directed by Alan Gibson and based on Jenni Hall’s novel Ask Agamemnon, the film is a cult oddity that stands out for its blend of lurid exploitation, pop-art style, and a genuinely disturbing exploration of fractured identity and taboo desire, reflecting some of Gibson’s signature Grand Guignol theatrics.

The first time I saw Goodbye Gemini, I went in with no expectations, lulled by its offbeat, decadent vibe and the peculiar innocence of its twin protagonists-only to find the film’s true horror creeping in almost imperceptibly, until by the finale I was left stunned, my mouth hanging wide open, reeling from the psychic shock of its quietly devastating impact. The film’s artistry lies in how its unsettling atmosphere and twisted themes sneak up on you, transforming what begins as a quirky character study into something far more disturbing and unforgettable.

Gibson directed several notable films and television works, particularly in the horror genre and British television. Some of his key films include Crescendo (1970) Dracula A.D. 1972 (1972) and The Satanic Rites of Dracula (1973), all these horror productions showcase his flair for atmospheric and stylish genre filmmaking.

At the center of the story are fraternal twins Jacki (Judy Geeson) and Julian (Martin Potter), whose unnervingly close relationship is the film’s emotional and thematic engine. Arriving in London for a break while their father is abroad, the twins are childlike and insular, clinging to their shared rituals and to Agamemnon, a battered black teddy bear they treat as a confidant and father figure. Their dynamic is immediately off-kilter: Julian, sensitive and increasingly unstable, rationalizes his incestuous fixation on Jacki as a natural extension of their “hive mind,” while Jacki, more grounded but not immune to her brother’s possessive love, floats like a leaf in the breeze between affection and resistance.

Judy Geeson is an accomplished English actress whose career has spanned film, stage, and television since the early 1960s. She made her stage debut as a child and quickly established herself as a versatile and striking presence. She gained international recognition at just 18 for her sensitive performance as Pamela Dare in the classic To Sir, with Love (1967) alongside Sidney Poitier, a role that showcased her fresh-faced charm and emotional depth. I’ve always adored Judy Geeson’s natural British beauty and pixie-like winsomeness- there’s an effortless radiance to her look that’s both enchanting and refreshingly uncontrived, making her presence on screen utterly captivating.

Geeson’s beauty is often described as luminous and quintessentially English. It is marked by her trademark blonde hair and soulful blue eyes with a star-kissed glimmer, which conveys both innocence and depth. With delicate, expressive features, a melodious and distinctly English voice, and a radiant complexion, she possesses a kind of fresh-faced charm that feels at once approachable and ethereal.

On screen, her beauty is never merely ornamental; it’s animated by an intelligence and emotional transparency that draw the viewer in, whether she’s playing a wide-eyed ingénue or a woman confronting darkness. Geeson’s performances are often noted for their authenticity, subtlety, and a certain luminous vulnerability, making her a standout in both horror and drama. Her enduring appeal lies in her ability to convey innocence and complexity, whether as a troubled schoolgirl, a Gothic heroine, or a woman facing extraordinary circumstances.

Judy Geeson became a familiar face in British cinema, starring in films such as Berserk! (1967), 10 Rillington Place (1971), and Brannigan (1975), often playing provocative or complex leads. Geeson’s presence is both classic and unconventional, capturing the spirit of the 1960s and 70s.

Martin Potter is a British actor whose career is marked by an eclectic mix of film, television, and stage roles. He first gained major international attention when Federico Fellini cast him as the lead, Encolpio, in the surreal epic Fellini Satyricon (1969), a performance that showcased his striking looks and ability to navigate complex, dreamlike material.
Potter followed this with notable roles in films like Goodbye Gemini (1970), where he plays the troubled and obsessive Julian, and Nicholas and Alexandra (1971), portraying Prince Yussoupov.

Potter’s career continued through the 1970s and 1980s with a range of genre work, including horror films like Craze 1974 with Jack Palance and Satan’s Slave (1976) and the TV mini-series The Legend of Robin Hood (1975), in which he played the title role. On television, he appeared in series like Doctor Who, The Borgias, and A.D., demonstrating his versatility across historical, fantastical, and dramatic genres.

Known for his intense screen presence and ability to embody both sensitivity and menace, Potter brought a unique, almost androgynous charisma to his roles, qualities that made his performances in psychologically complex films like Goodbye Gemini especially memorable. His career, while perhaps never reaching the mainstream stardom of some contemporaries, remains notable for its adventurous choices and the lasting impression he left in cult and arthouse cinema. To me, Martin Potter possesses an ethereal, otherworldly beauty, almost fairytale-like striking, as if he’s wandered out of a dream or stepped from the passages of a fabled world. I find his features both celestial and enchantingly unreal.

In Goodbye Gemini, the city Jacki and Julian enter is a carnival of decadence and decay, captured in Geoffrey Unsworth’s dreamy, soft-focus cinematography. London’s nightclubs, strip bars, and swinging houseboat parties pulse with jazz-funk and lounge music (Christopher Gunning’s score is a highlight). The film’s parade of drag queens, swingers, and hustlers offers a snapshot of a counterculture, already the carnival atmosphere slowly casting a shadow over itself. All the bright colors of the era bleeding into something more toxic, darker, and more desperate.

The twins’ fashion is as striking as their behavior: Jacki’s mod dresses and Julian’s flamboyant, gender-fluid ensembles are emblematic of the era’s anything-goes ethos, but also signal their detachment from the world around them.

Things spiral when they fall in with Clive (Alexis Kanner), a charismatic but predatory gambler and pimp whose debts and schemes drag the twins into a web of blackmail and sexual violence. Clive’s manipulation of Julian is especially cruel: after plying him with drugs and alcohol, he arranges for Julian to be sexually assaulted by two of his “Circus” prostitutes in drag, photographing the act for leverage in a blackmail scheme.

This sequence, and the film’s willingness to confront sexual taboo head-on, marks it as one of the more daring entries in 1970s British horror- a time when the genre was increasingly preoccupied with the breakdown of family, identity, and societal norms.

Judy Geeson is mesmerizing as Jacki, channeling innocence and trauma in the same way. Her performance is the film’s anchor: she is both the object of Julian’s obsession and a victim of the world’s exploitations, moving from wide-eyed naiveté to near-catatonic despair as the story darkens. Martin Potter’s Julian is equally compelling; his delicate beauty and volatility make the character’s descent into madness both pitiable and chilling. Potter has the look of a seraphim, broken and a bit out of sync, trying to navigate the world, all the while consumed by his love for his sister. He moves through life like half of a puzzle piece without a picture, never quite fitting in, always searching for where he belongs, as long as it’s with Jacki.

Their chemistry is palpable, and the film’s many mirror shots and doubled images reinforce the sense that they are two halves of a single, fractured psyche.

The supporting cast adds further texture: Michael Redgrave, in one of his last roles, plays the aging MP James Harrington-Smith, whose attempts to help Jacki are compromised by his own fear of scandal. Alexis Kanner’s Clive is all sleazy charm and menace, while Marian Diamond’s Denise provides a rare note of empathy amid the film’s parade of grotesques.

As the plot unravels, the twins’ insularity proves fatal. After Jacki learns of Clive’s blackmail and the full extent of his cruelty, she and Julian lure him into a ritualistic trap, killing him in a scene that is both surreal and tragic and to be candid, it stands as one of the most macabre and unsettling murder scenes I have encountered in classic horror cinema. The destruction of Agamemnon, their beloved bear, during the murder shatters Jacki’s fragile psyche, and she flees into the city, lost and amnesiac. The film’s final act is a bleak, hallucinatory journey through a London that now feels cold and alien, culminating in a tragic confrontation between the twins that leaves both dead-victims of their own inability to escape the closed world they’ve built for themselves.

Goodbye Gemini is a film of contradictions: it is campy and stylish, yet genuinely disturbing; it revels in the fashions and freedoms of the late ’60s, but ultimately exposes the emptiness and moral bankruptcy beneath the surface.

Its impact on 1970s psychological horror is notable, as it anticipates later films that would explore the dark side of youth culture and the dangers of unchecked desire. The film’s queasy, dreamlike vibe, its willingness to confront taboo, and its visual inventiveness have earned it a cult following, even as some contemporary critics dismissed it as lurid or over-the-top.

Goodbye Gemini stands as a vivid time capsule of a society in transition, its pop-art excess and twisted themes offering both a critique and a celebration of the era’s freedoms and follies. Judy Geeson’s performance, in particular, remains a haunting portrait of innocence corrupted, while the film’s exploration of identity, sexuality, and the limits of familial love continues to showcase the film’s ability to fascinate and unsettle.

#69 down, 81 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #68 THE GHOST SHIP 1943 / THE LEOPARD MAN 1943 & THE SEVENTH VICTIM 1943

A Symphony of Dark Patches- The Val Lewton Legacy 1943

SPOILER ALERT!

As I continue my exploration of Val Lewton’s remarkable legacy at The Last Drive In, having already written about The Seventh Victim, Curse of the Cat People, and The Ghost Ship, I’ll be working on an upcoming feature that will delve into four more of his atmospheric and thematically rich works: Cat People 1942, I Walked with a Zombie (1943), Isle of the Dead (1945) and Bedlam (1946).

Each of these films, though distinct in setting and subject, showcases Lewton’s unparalleled ability to fuse horror with social commentary, psychological depth, and a painter’s eye for shadow and suggestion.

Val Lewton’s 1943 RKO horror cycle –The Ghost Ship 1943, The Leopard Man 1943, and The Seventh Victim 1943-stands as a masterclass in psychological terror, moodiness, and narrative innovation, each film distinct yet bound by Lewton’s signature sensibility: an insistence on suggestion over spectacle, the power of the unseen, and a fascination with the darkness lurking in the human soul.

As embodied in these three films, Lewton’s legacy is one of transformation: of B-movie budgets alchemized into works of poetic terror, of genre conventions into vehicles for philosophical inquiry. Working with a repertoire of collaborators-directors, Tourneur and Robson, cinematographer Musuraca, composer Roy Webb, and a recurring troupe of actors, Lewton’s productions are marked by their psychological acuity, visual sophistication, and a willingness to leave horror unresolved, lingering in the shadows and the mind.

Val Lewton’s Shadowed Visions: The Haunting Trilogy of 1943:

In The Ghost Ship, The Leopard Man, and The Seventh Victim, Lewton created not just horror films, but meditations on fear, power, and the mysteries that haunt us all.

Lewton’s 1943 films thrive on paradox-constraint breeding innovation, silence screaming louder than spectacle. His collaborators, writers plumbing Freud and fate, cinematographers sculpting light into emotion, elevating pulp into poetry.

Richard Dix’s Captain Stone, Dennis O’Keefe’s everyman guilt, and Jean Brooks’ ethereal despair are not mere characters but vessels for universal fears. These films, though dismissed in their time, now pulse with relevance, their themes of isolation, authoritarian rot, and existential dread resonating in an age of anxiety. Lewton’s legacy is etched in the shadows he so masterfully conjured, proving that true horror lies not in the monster revealed but in the darkness we carry around with us.

In the dimly lit corridors of 1940s cinema, Val Lewton carved a niche where shadows whispered and the unseen terrorized, crafting this trio of films in 1943 –The Ghost Ship, The Leopard Man, and The Seventh Victim– that redefined horror through psychological nuance and atmospheric mastery. These works, though distinct in narrative, are bound by Lewton’s signature alchemy of suggestion, existential dread, and a profound understanding of human fragility. Each film, a chiaroscuro of fear and introspection, reveals Lewton’s genius for transforming B-movie constraints into meditations on power, alienation, and the darkness within.

THE GHOST SHIP 1943

The Ghost Ship, directed by Mark Robson and shot with spectral elegance by Nicholas Musuraca, is a study in authority gone awry and the terror of isolation at sea. Robson’s direction, while perhaps less flamboyant than Tourneur’s in other Lewton productions, is perfectly attuned to the material’s psychological focus.

The film immerses you in the claustrophobic world of the Altair, a merchant vessel helmed by the enigmatic Captain Will Stone (Richard Dix).

The story follows Tom Merriam (Russell Wade), a young idealistic merchant marine officer who joins the crew of the Altair under the seemingly benevolent command of Captain Stone. From the moment young officer Merriam steps aboard, the film tightens like a noose, blending maritime routine with mounting unease.

At first, Stone appears to be a model of paternal authority, imparting philosophical lessons about leadership and camaraderie at sea, and what begins as mentorship soon devolves into tyrannical paranoia as Merriam begins to suspect Stone is dangerously unhinged.

As the voyage progresses, Merriam witnesses a series of increasingly suspicious and fatal incidents: -an impression confirmed by a series of mysterious deaths that the superstitious crew attributes to a curse.

A crewman’s death during a botched medical emergency, another crushed by an anchor chain after crossing the captain, and the general sense of dread that pervades the ship. He becomes convinced that Stone is not only dangerously obsessed with his own authority but may also be a murderer, using the power of his position to eliminate those who threaten his control.

Stone, initially a paternal figure, reveals a philosophy steeped in authoritarian zeal, justifying control through a warped sense of duty. Nicholas Musuraca’s cinematography- a dance of shadows and stark light- transforms the ship’s hull into a labyrinth of moral decay.

The film’s tension is heightened by the crew’s superstitious belief that the ship is cursed, and by the isolation that renders Merriam’s warnings futile, leaving him to fend for himself with his fear and desperation. His attempts to expose Stone’s madness are met with disbelief and hostility, leaving him increasingly alone and vulnerable.

Robson and Lewton, working with a lean script by Donald Henderson Clarke from a story by Leo Mittler, (and with significant input from Lewton himself), craft a suspense drama where the true horror is psychological: Stone’s descent from idealist to tyrant, his authority morphing into a spiritual and existential threat.

A swinging chain becomes a pendulum of doom, its erratic movements mirroring Stone’s unraveling psyche, while the mute Finn’s (Skelton Knaggs) haunting voiceover pierces the silence like a dirge.

The film’s use of single-source lighting, shadow-drenched sets, and the haunting narration of Finn who is mute creates a mood of mounting dread, culminating in a claustrophobic showdown in the darkness of the ship’s hold.

The climax erupts in a brutal struggle in the darkness of Merriam’s cabin, as Stone, knife in hand, finally snaps and attempts to kill the young officer, only to be stopped by Finn, whose own presence and voiceover add a spectral, fatalistic undertone to the film. The Ghost Ship’s terror lies not in specters but in the banality of tyranny, as Stone’s descent into madness culminates in the knife fight drenched in primal desperation. Here, Lewton interrogates the seduction of power, framing the sea as a void where humanity drifts anchorless.

Withdrawn from circulation for decades due to a plagiarism lawsuit, The Ghost Ship has since been recognized for its compact, complex portrait of madness and its almost spiritual take on the dangers of unchecked power.

Richard Dix delivers a chilling and nuanced performance as Captain Will Stone, embodying a man whose authority slowly transforms from a steady anchor to a tightening noose of obsession and madness. At first, Dix’s Stone appears composed and even paternal, eager to mentor the young third officer, but beneath his calm exterior lurks a deep insecurity and a need for absolute control. As the voyage progresses, Dix masterfully lets Stone’s facade slip, revealing flashes of paranoia, rigidity, and an unsettling belief in his own infallibility. His descent is marked by small, tightly controlled gestures and a simmering intensity, never tipping into melodrama, but instead letting the menace build in his silences and cold stares. Dix’s portrayal is that of a man isolated not just by the sea, but by his own delusions, his authority twisted into something both pitiable and terrifying. His performance anchors the film’s psychological tension, making Captain Stone’s madness feel both inevitable and a deeply human study in how power and isolation can corrode the mind.

Some of the key scenes: In the suffocating blackness of the ship’s hold, a newly painted anchor chain hangs like a coiled serpent, gleaming and sinister in the lamplight. When a gale rises, the chain thrashes and lashes against the hull, a living embodiment of chaos barely contained. Captain Stone, unmoving and eerily serene, watches from a lighted window as the crew grapples with the writhing metal-his authority as cold and unyielding as the iron links themselves. The chain becomes a chilling metaphor for Stone’s fractured mind, caught between order and the abyss.

Later, the anchor chain scene takes on a fatal gravity. Stone orchestrates the death of a dissenting sailor named Louie by locking him in with a descending anchor chain, showcasing Dix’s ability to convey both the captain’s chilling calm and his unraveling psyche.

Louie, one of the more outspoken sailors, is sent to supervise the chain as it’s stowed in the loading compartment. As he signals for the chain’s descent, the door behind him is quietly locked. The chain begins its ponderous, inexorable drop, the clanking metal drowning out any cries for help. In the dim, claustrophobic space, Louie is buried alive by the relentless weight of the chain, a death as silent and implacable as the captain’s authority. The rest of the crew only finds his lifeless form after the deed is done, the horror of the moment underscored by the cold indifference of steel and shadow.

That anchor chain scene is mesmerizing and deeply unsettling to me- there’s something so striking and shockingly brutal about watching a man slowly, helplessly buried alive by cold, unfeeling metal, all while the rest of the world carries on above, oblivious to his fate—the poor soul.

Another striking moment comes when the ship’s doctor is unable to operate on a crewman with a burst appendix. The young officer Merriam, pressed into action, must take over the surgery himself. The captain’s chilling detachment and insistence on protocol hang over the scene, and his authority is now a palpable threat rather than a source of safety. The sickbay becomes a stage for Stone’s psychological unraveling, every flicker of light and shadow sharpening the sense of nihilism.

Cinematographer Nicholas Musuraca stands as one of the true architects of film noir’s visual identity; his work behind the camera helped define the look and feel of classic film noir. Works that include genre landmarks like Stranger on the Third Floor (1940), The Spiral Staircase (1946), The Locket (1946), Deadline at Dawn (1946), and the quintessential noir, Out of the Past (1947). Not to mention the atmospheric horror of Val Lewton’s Cat People (1942).

Noirvember – Freudian Femme Fatales – 1946 : The Dark Mirror (1946) & The Locket (1946) ‘Twisted Inside’

Musuraca’s signature style is unmistakable. His cinematography is defined by a masterful use of chiaroscuro, where deep shadows and sharp beams of light carve the frame into stark, expressive compositions alive with both possibility and threat. Musuraca’s cinematography transforms RKO’s standing ship set into a claustrophobic labyrinth of shadow and menace.The film’s use of single-source lighting and shadowy, confined spaces amplifies the sense of entrapment and moral ambiguity, while Roy Webb’s score and the contrasting calypso songs sung by Sir Lancelot on board provide moments of eerie levity amid the gloom.

Throughout, Lewton’s direction and the film’s noir-inspired cinematography use single-source lighting and deep shadows to evoke a world where menace lurks just beyond the reach of reason. The ship itself becomes a floating prison, each corridor and cabin heavy with the weight of unspoken fears, the darkness pressing in as tightly as the captain’s grip on his crew.

These scenes, especially the anchor chain’s deadly descent, capture the film’s unique blend of psychological horror and poetic fatalism, making The Ghost Ship a haunting meditation on authority, madness, and the thin line between protection and destruction.

The Ghost Ship (1943) stands as one of Val Lewton’s most psychologically charged and atmospheric films, a seafaring thriller that eschews the supernatural in favor of a tense, slow-burning study of authority, paranoia, and the darkness that can take root in isolation. The nearly all-male cast and the absence of romantic subplots further intensify the film’s focus on power dynamics, conformity, and the dangers of unchecked power. Parallels to the rise of fascism and the psychological toll of war are unmistakable.

THE LEOPARD MAN 1943

If The Ghost Ship is a tale of authority and the dark psychology from oceanic isolation at sea, The Leopard Man, directed by Jacques Tourneur and adapted by Ardel Wray and Edward Dein from Cornell Woolrich’s novel, Black Alibi is a meditation on fate and the lurking predatory instincts within ordinary life-where fear prowls the shadows of the everyday, and the boundaries between human and beast blur beneath the surface of a seemingly civilized town. The story is transformed from a pulpy premise into a haunting exploration of fear, guilt, and the duality of human nature.

The film transplants Lewton’s signature shadowy anxieties to a sun-baked New Mexico border town, where it unravels as a proto-slasher draped in existential ambiguity.

The story begins with a brash nightclub promoter Jerry Manning (Dennis O’Keefe) who borrows a black leopard to bolster his lover Kiki Walker’s (Jean Brooks) act, hoping to outshine her rival, the fiery dancer Clo-Clo (Margo) and it unleashes chaos when his publicity stunt goes awry. Maria, the fortune teller played by Isabel Jewell, warns Clo-Clo about impending danger (“something black” coming for her). When Clo-Clo startles the leopard with her castanets, the animal flees into the night, setting off a chain of deaths that fracture the town’s fragile peace as the leopard escapes, it ignites a wave of paranoia, coinciding with a series of gruesome deaths and brutal murders that blur the line between animal savagery and human depravity.

The film fractures into glimpses of fragility and moments of defenselessness, each victim-a girl locked out by her mother, and a dancer stalked through barren streets, Consuelo, and a local woman who is trapped inside a cemetery after visiting her father’s grave, another apparent victim of the leopard, etched with tragic intimacy. Tourneur, alongside cinematographer Robert De Grasse, wields sound and shadow like weapons: the echo of claws on cobblestones, the suffocating darkness behind a door, the silent scream of a victim unheard. Dennis O’Keefe’s Jerry Manning, a man haunted by his complicity, becomes a reluctant detective in a world where guilt is as pervasive as fear.

The first victim, Teresa (Margaret Landry), becomes an emblem of the film’s chilling restraint: Tourneur and cinematographer Robert De Grasse use shadows, sound, and off-screen violence to maximum effect, most memorably in the harrowing scene where a young girl, locked out of her home by her mother for forgetting cornmeal, is pursued through the shadowed streets by the sound of claws on cobblestones. Her death occurs off-screen, marked only by a scream and blood seeping beneath a door- killed just beyond her mother’s reach as she listens in horror. It’s a sequence that distills Lewton’s genius for evoking terror through suggestion.

Following the doomed victims in self-contained vignettes, the film’s structure was ahead of its time and is now recognized as a precursor to the American serial killer film.

The film’s brilliance lies in its ambiguity: Are the killings the work of the animal, or a human predator hiding in plain sight? The Leopard Man subverts expectations, its true horror lying not in the beast but in the realization that monstrosity wears a human face—a revelation that would echo through decades of horror to come.

While some contemporary critics found the film uneven, modern reassessment hails its taut pacing, visual inventiveness, and its almost noir-like meditation on fate and fear.

Tourneur and cinematographer Robert De Grasse craft a world where light and darkness duel for dominance. The New Mexico setting, with its adobe walls and arid landscapes, becomes a character in its own right, its sunlit exteriors contrasting with the suffocating gloom of alleyways and cemeteries. The film’s most potent weapon is sound-the click of castanets, the growl of an unseen beast, the eerie silence of a locked gate-each a harbinger of doom. When Clo-Clo, lured by a lost $100 bill, meets her fate in a moonlit arroyo, the camera lingers on her trembling hand, the castanets still clutched in her grip. It’s a moment of poetic brutality, underscoring the film’s theme of fate and the inevitability of violence.

At its core, The Leopard Man is a proto-slasher, structured around sketches of vulnerability. Each victim, their stories intertwining like threads in a morbid tapestry. The killer, revealed to be Dr. Galbraith (James Bell), a curator obsessed with the town’s violent history, embodies the film’s exploration of repressed desires. His confession that Teresa’s mauling awakened a latent bloodlust mirrors Lewton’s fascination with the darkness lurking beneath societal facades. The climax, set against a Catholic procession commemorating a colonial massacre, merges past and present sins, as Galbraith is cornered amid chanting mourners and flickering candles.

Jean Brooks and Dennis O’Keefe anchor the film with understated performances, their guilt and determination reflecting the moral ambiguity of Lewton’s universe. Margo’s Clo-Clo, all smoldering allure and defiant pride, stands out as a symbol of resilience in a world where women are painted as both predators and prey. Yet the true star is the atmosphere– a suffocating blend of noir aesthetics and Gothic melancholy, elevated by Roy Webb’s haunting score.

Initially dismissed as a B-movie curio, The Leopard Man has been reevaluated as a pioneering work that prefigured the slasher genre and modern horror’s psychological depth. Lewton, ever the alchemist of anxiety, uses the leopard as a metaphor for uncontrollable fear, while Tourneur’s direction, a dance of shadows and silence, transforms budgetary constraints into artistic triumphs. The film’s legacy lies in its refusal to provide easy answers, leaving audiences to grapple with the same question that torments Jerry and Kiki: Is the true monster the beast, the man, or the collective complicity that allows evil to thrive? In Lewton’s world, the most terrifying forces are those we cannot see- and those we dare not confront within ourselves.

THE SEVENTH VICTIM 1943

The Seventh Victim, Mark Robson’s directorial debut, is perhaps the most existential, enigmatic, and nihilistic of Lewton’s 1943 trilogy, which I’m focusing on here.

In The Seventh Victim, Lewton’s gaze turns even more inward, probing the abyss of the human soul. Scripted by Charles O’Neal and DeWitt Bodeen, the film follows Mary Gibson (Kim Hunter, in her first screen role) as she searches for her missing sister Jacqueline (Jean Brooks) in a shadowy, labyrinthine occult underbelly of Greenwich Village where her sister Jacqueline languishes under the thrall of the Palladists, a Satanist cult veiled in bourgeois normalcy.

The trail leads her into the orbit of the Palladists, a secret society pledged to nonviolence but committed to driving traitors to suicide. Not unlike Lewton’s other films, The Seventh Victim contains no overt supernatural element; its horror is existential, rooted in despair, alienation, and the seductive pull of death.

Robson and Musuraca drape the film in chiaroscuro gloom, echoing the influence of European expressionism and film noir. The narrative, fragmented by studio cuts, is dreamlike and unsettling, building to a climax that is both ambiguous and devastating: Jacqueline, hounded by the cult and her own death wish, takes her own life off-screen, the film ending with the sound of a chair falling and a neighbor’s whispered longing for “just one more moment of life.” Mimi’s character, played by Lewton regular Elizabeth Russell, is a striking counterpoint to the film’s themes of despair and suicide. While Jacqueline (Jean Brooks) is drawn toward death, Mimi expresses a poignant desire to keep living.

Kim Hunter’s character in The Seventh Victim is Mary Gibson, a sheltered and earnest young woman whose journey drives the film’s emotional core. Fresh out of boarding school, Mary has a gentle, sincere, and quietly determined style that is modest and unassuming, marked by innocence rather than sophistication. Yet beneath that innocence is a quiet resilience; as she searches for her missing sister Jacqueline in the shadowy maze of New York, Mary’s persistence and empathy set her apart. She is driven by a deep longing to reconnect with Jacqueline, hoping to save her from whatever darkness has claimed her life. Mary seeks not just answers, but the possibility of healing and redemption for her sister, even as she’s drawn into a world far more bleak and complex than she ever imagined. The rest of the cast- Tom Conway as Dr. Judd, Isabel Jewell, and Hugh Beaumont- contributes to the film’s sense of haunted community, each character adrift in a world where evil is banal, and hope is fleeting.

Musuraca’s camera paints a world of shadowy melancholy, where rain-slicked alleys and candlelit rituals frame Jacqueline’s existential torment. Her longing for death, poised between a noose and poisoned wine, becomes a silent scream against life’s futility, a theme echoed in the film’s infamous conclusion: the chair’s crash and a neighbor’s wistful sigh.

The Palladists, with their hollow dogma, mirror postwar anxieties of hidden evils, while subtexts of repressed sexuality and identity ripple beneath the surface. Jean Brooks’ performance, a spectral blend of resignation and defiance, anchors the film’s exploration of despair, making The Seventh Victim less a horror tale than a requiem for the lost.

The Seventh Victim unfolds like a shadowy descent into the underworld of despair, its central metaphor-the hangman’s noose suspended in an empty, dimly lit room-looming over the film as both a literal threat and a symbol of the inescapable pull of death. Val Lewton and director Mark Robson craft a cinematic labyrinth where every corridor and clock tick becomes a reminder of time slipping away, and every character seems to wander, ghostlike, through a city that offers neither refuge nor redemption. Jacqueline, the film’s tragic center, drifts through life as if already half-claimed by the grave, her voice rarely heard, her agency stripped away until she becomes less a person than a vessel for existential anguish and the numbing chill of depression.

Lewton’s Greenwich Village is a modern Dantean underworld, a place where the search for a missing sister becomes a spiritual journey through sin, penance, and the hope dashed by no salvation.

The cult of the Palladists, with their pacifist facade and insidious psychological cruelty, externalizes the internal struggle of suicidal ideation: their whispered urgings to Jacqueline to end her life echo the relentless, destructive voices of depression itself. The infamous scene in which a poisoned chalice is pressed upon her, the day’s light shifting as the group takes turns persuading her to drink, becomes a ritualized dramatization of despair, the cult acting as the personification of every dark thought and voice that seeks to erode the will to live.

The film’s final passages are as poetic as they are devastating. Jacqueline’s encounter with her neighbor Mimi – a woman dying of tuberculosis who longs for one more night of laughter and life- serves as a mirror to Jacqueline’s own longing for oblivion.

When Mimi leaves for her last dance, the camera lingers on the empty chair and the noose, and the sound of the chair’s fall is the film’s closing punctuation: a stark, unblinking acknowledgment of the tragedy of self-destruction. As Jacqueline’s voice repeats the line from John Donne-“I run to death, and death meets me as fast / And all my pleasures are like yesterday”– the film crystallizes into a dark, existential fable where death is not a monster but an ever-present shadow, a seductive promise, and, for some, tragically a final act of agency.

In The Seventh Victim, Lewton does not sensationalize horror; instead, he renders it with the quiet, inexorable force of a tide pulling souls into darkness, making the film not just a tale of cults and murder, but a haunting meditation on loneliness, mental health, and the fragile boundary between longing for life and surrendering to death.

#68 down, 82 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #67 Grave of the Vampire 1972

GRAVE OF THE VAMPIRE 1972

John Hayes’s Grave of the Vampire (1972) stands as one of the more audacious and unsettling entries in early 1970s American horror, a film that fuses the Gothic tradition with a raw, contemporary sensibility and a willingness to push the boundaries of vampire mythology. Working from a script by David Chase (who would later create The Sopranos), Hayes crafts a narrative that is as much about generational trauma and the legacy of violence as it is about supernatural terror, all set against a backdrop of fog-shrouded cemeteries and grimly lit interiors that evoke both classic Universal horror and the grindhouse energy of its era.

The film opens with a sequence that is both atmospheric and shocking: in 1940s California, a young couple, Paul and Leslie, share a romantic moment in a cemetery-only to be attacked by the undead Caleb Croft, a former serial rapist and murderer now risen as a vampire. Croft brutally murders Paul and assaults Leslie in an open grave, a scene that immediately signals the film’s willingness to confront taboo and violence head-on. The aftermath is no less disturbing: Leslie, traumatized and catatonic, discovers she is pregnant. Despite her doctor’s insistence that she abort the abnormal fetus, Leslie refuses, and soon gives birth to a child who will only feed on blood – a sequence rendered with a clinical horror that has become infamous among genre fans.

The blood breastfeeding scene is a moment of true cinematic transgression. This taboo-shattering image upends the boundaries between nourishment and horror, turning a primal act of maternal care into something shockingly abject and unforgettable. It’s a sequence that doesn’t just flirt with the forbidden; it charges headlong into it, forcing the viewer to confront the monstrous and the intimate in the same breath, and marking the film as boldly willing to violate the most sacred social and bodily taboos.

Leslie’s devotion to her son James is both tragic and grotesque. She draws her own blood from her breast to feed him, sacrificing her health and ultimately her life. Orphaned, James grows up an outcast, his childhood marked by alienation and secrecy. The film then leaps forward three decades: Leslie is dead, and James (now played by William Smith, whose imposing physicality and haunted stoicism give the character a mythic weight) has dedicated his life to hunting down his monstrous father, whom he blames for his mother’s suffering.

James’s quest leads him to a university, where Croft, now posing as Professor Adrian Lockwood, teaches folklore and mythology, a sly nod to the vampire’s ability to hide in plain sight and manipulate the stories told about him. The dynamic between father and son is the film’s true engine: Croft, played with chilling relish by Michael Pataki, is both charismatic and repellent, a predator who moves through the world with the confidence of someone who has already conquered death. Pataki’s performance, often compared to Robert Quarry’s Count Yorga, brings a palpable menace to the role, while Smith’s James is a study in simmering rage and existential anguish.

Smith and Pataki electrify the screen with a kind of primal, otherworldly intensity, each bringing his own brand of raw energy that turns every confrontation into a powder keg of testosterone and simmering rage. Pataki’s performance as Croft is all seething indignation and predatory menace, while Smith’s stoic, brooding presence feels like a force of nature barely held in check; together, they create a charged atmosphere where father and son seem locked in a supernatural struggle for dominance, their performances practically crackling with dark, masculine volatility.

The film’s middle act is a tapestry of Gothic and modern horror tropes: Croft stalks and kills, James investigates, and a circle of graduate students, including Anne (Lyn Peters) and Anita (Diane Holden), are drawn into the web of violence and supernatural intrigue. A séance scene, in which Croft attempts to channel his dead wife through Anne, is a highlight, blending camp and genuine eeriness as the boundaries between the living and the dead blur. The film’s most notorious scenes the blood-fed infant, the mother’s sacrifice, the climactic battle between James and Croft- are rendered with a grim, unflinching seriousness that sets Grave of the Vampire apart from its campier contemporaries.

Visually, Hayes and cinematographer Paul Hipp (sometimes credited as Paul Glickman) create an oppressively dark atmosphere. The film’s opening, with its slow, circular tracking shot around Croft’s tomb, is punctuated by the sound of a heartbeat- a motif that recurs throughout, evoking both the persistence of evil and the perverse “life” of the vampire.

The lighting is stark, the sets cheap but effective, and the overall mood is one of relentless dread. Jaime Mendoza-Nava’s eerie score underlines the film’s somber, dead-serious tone, eschewing the tongue-in-cheek approach of some contemporaneous vampire films for something more genuinely unsettling.

Grave of the Vampire is not without its flaws- some critics have noted the uneven pacing, variable acting, and low-budget production values- but its originality and willingness to disturb have earned it a lasting cult reputation. The film’s exploration of the “dhampir”-the half-human, half-vampire offspring, though never named as such- adds a layer of tragic inevitability to the narrative. In the final moments, after James succeeds in staking his father, he himself succumbs to the vampire’s curse, sprouting fangs as he urges Anne to flee, the film ending with the ominous words: “Fin. Ou peut-être pas?…” (“The End. Or perhaps not?”)

Critically, Grave of the Vampire occupies a unique place in the evolution of American horror. It bridges the gap between the Gothic tradition and the more explicit, psychologically driven horror that would define the decade. Its influence can be felt in later explorations of vampirism as a metaphor for inherited trauma and the monstrousness within families. In its best moments, the film is both a grim fairy tale and a bleak meditation on the inescapability of blood ties, literal and figurative. For all its rough edges, Grave of the Vampire remains a singular, somber, and deeply unsettling artifact of 1970s horror.

#67 down, 83 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #66 God Told Me To 1976

Larry Cohen’s God Told Me To (1976) is one of the most audacious and thematically combustible films to emerge from the 1970s horror landscape- a feverish blend of police procedural, religious horror, and science fiction that channels the urban paranoia and spiritual unease of its era. Written, directed, and produced by Cohen, the film unfolds with the raw, guerrilla energy that defines his best work, using the gritty streets of New York City as both a backdrop and a character in its own right.

Larry Cohen was a prolific and innovative, and often subversive, writer-director for both feature film and television, whose career spanned genres and decades, leaving an indelible mark on cult and genre cinema. He first gained attention with the gritty blaxploitation classics Black Caesar (1973) and Hell Up in Harlem (1973), before making his name in horror and science fiction with the It’s Alive trilogy (beginning in 1974), which blended family drama with ecological and mutant-monster terror.

With Cohen’s God Told Me To (1976), he pushed boundaries with its fusion of detective drama, supernatural thriller, and speculative, imaginative science fantasy, earning cult status for its audacious themes and urban paranoia. He continued to innovate with films like Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), a unique black comedy monster movie set in New York City, and The Stuff (1985), a satirical horror film about a deadly, addictive dessert.

God Told Me To opens with a jarring act of violence: a sniper perched atop a water tower calmly picks off pedestrians below, killing fifteen people in the span of minutes. When NYPD detective Peter Nicholas (Tony Lo Bianco) confronts the shooter, the man, almost serene, explains his motive with chilling simplicity: “God told me to,” before leaping to his death.

This phrase becomes the haunting refrain of the film, echoed by a series of seemingly ordinary New Yorkers who, in rapid succession, commit brutal murders, each claiming divine instruction as their reason. As Nicholas investigates, the case spirals from urban crime drama into metaphysical nightmare: mass stabbings, a police officer opening fire at a parade (in a memorable early screen appearance by Andy Kaufman), and a family annihilation linked by the same cryptic justification.

Cohen’s script is a wild, genre-mashing ride, propelling Nicholas through a labyrinth of clues that lead from the city’s underbelly to the heights of cosmic horror. The detective’s journey is as much internal as external: a devout Catholic, Nicholas finds his faith and identity unraveling as he discovers that the murders are orchestrated by Bernard Phillips (Richard Lynch), a mysterious, androgynous cult leader with psychic powers and a messianic aura. Phillips, it emerges, is the product of a “virgin birth” after his mother’s alien abduction – a revelation that not only reframes the film’s religious overtones as extraterrestrial intervention, but also implicates Nicholas himself as another hybrid, caught between human and alien ancestry.

The film’s most striking set pieces- the opening massacre, the parade shooting, the chillingly calm confession of a family murderer- are shot with a documentary immediacy. Cohen and cinematographer Paul Glickman employ handheld cameras, natural lighting, and real New York locations, giving the film a vérité authenticity that makes its supernatural turns all the more jarring.

The city itself is rendered as a living organism: chaotic, dangerous, and indifferent, its steam vents and neon-lit streets amplifying the film’s sense of urban malaise and existential dread. That gritty feel of New York City in the 1970s permeated and captured cinema in the decade. When the narrative veers into the surreal-alien abduction flashbacks, glowing messiahs, and the infamous “alien vagina” reveal-the effect is both disorienting and hypnotic, a collision of grindhouse exploitation and philosophical provocation.

Tony Lo Bianco anchors the film with a performance of haunted intensity, his stoic exterior slowly eroded by the mounting horror and personal revelations. He’s ably supported by a cast of genre stalwarts and character actors, including Sandy Dennis as Nicholas’s estranged wife, Sylvia Sidney as a doomed mother, and Richard Lynch, whose ethereal menace as Phillips is unforgettable, as is all of Lynch’s other work.

Sandy Dennis was renowned for her utterly distinctive acting style, marked by a nervous, fragile energy, a fluttering vulnerability, and a method-trained authenticity that made her performances feel raw and unpredictable.

Critics often described her as “neurotic and mannered,” with a signature delivery that included sudden shifts in pitch, staccato phrasing, and expressive, almost twitchy gestures, all of which lent her characters a sense of emotional volatility and depth. Dennis excelled in both stage and screen roles, earning two Tony Awards and an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress as the vulnerable Honey in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (1966).

Other notable roles include the idealistic teacher in Up the Down Staircase (1967), the quietly obsessed Frances in That Cold Day in the Park (1969), and the eccentric Mona in Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean (1982). Her performances, whether in drama or comedy, were transformative, imbuing even supporting roles with a haunting, unforgettable presence. And she was crazy about her cats, like me!

Altman’s That Cold Day In The Park: 1960’s Repressed Psychosexual Spinster at 30+ and the Young Colt Playing Mute

Richard Lynch, meanwhile, was instantly recognizable for his striking, angular features and intense, almost spectral screen presence- often attributed to the burn scars he sustained early in life, which gave him a uniquely menacing, otherworldly look. Lynch’s acting style was chillingly understated yet magnetic, exuding a quiet, simmering menace that made him a natural fit for villains and enigmatic figures, becaming a cult icon in horror and genre cinema, Richard Lynch delivers one of his most haunting performances in The Premonition (1976), embodying the carnival clown Jude with a strange, unnerving charisma-in that film, his portrayal is both profoundly unsettling and unexpectedly sympathetic, imbuing the character with a deranged innocence and a sense of alienation that lingers long after the film ends.

A Trailer a Day Keeps the Boogeyman Away! The Premonition 1976 – Bright Mother, Nightmare Mother

Other of his genre films include God Told Me To (1976), where his ethereal, messianic antagonist left an indelible mark; The Sword and the Sorcerer (1982); Bad Dreams (1988); and Halloween (2007). Lynch’s legacy is that of a performer who could command the screen with a glance, embodying both supernatural evil and tragic complexity.

Even in fleeting roles in Cohen’s film, such as Andy Kaufman’s deranged police officer, the ensemble brings a lived-in authenticity that grounds the film’s wildest conceits.

Frank Cordell’s score, originally intended to be composed by Bernard Herrmann before his untimely death, adds a layer of somber unease, while Cohen’s script laces the narrative with biting social commentary on faith, fanaticism, and the thin line between religious devotion and madness.

The film’s willingness to question the benevolence of higher powers and to conflate religious ecstasy with alien manipulation was controversial in its day and remains provocative today.

Critically, God Told Me To was met with confusion and some derision upon release. Roger Ebert called it “the most confused feature-length film I’ve ever seen,” but its reputation has only grown with time. Modern critics and horror historians now recognize it as a cult classic, a film whose “messy” structure and tonal shifts are part of its singular charm and lasting impact. Its influence can be traced in later works that blend urban realism with cosmic horror and religious paranoia, from The X-Files and beyond.

In the context of 1970s horror, God Told Me To stands out for its fearless genre-blending, its willingness to confront taboo subjects, and its portrait of a city- and a society- on the brink of spiritual and existential crisis. Cohen’s film is as unsettling as it is original: a work that refuses easy answers, leaving audiences with the chilling possibility that the most terrifying commands might come not from monsters or madmen, but from the voices we trust most.

#66 down, 84 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #65 GAMES 1967 / WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH HELEN? 1971 & THE MAD ROOM 1969

SPOILER ALERT!

GAMES 1967 

Deadly Diversions: Curtis Harrington’s Games and the Art of Psychological Deception:

I’ll be diving deeper into the chilling world of Curtis Harrington with a special feature on his thematic Horror of Personality at The Last Drive In, taking a close look at two of these fascinating psychological thrillers: What’s the Matter with Helen?-a feverish, Gothic tale of paranoia and unraveling sanity starring Shelley Winters and Debbie Reynolds-and of course a deeper dive into Games 1967, this stylish, twisted exploration of manipulation and deceit. Harrington’s films are masterclasses in atmospheric tension and the dark corners of the human psyche, blending Gothic horror with a uniquely personal, psychological edge.

Today, as a bonus, while it’s not a Harrington film, I’ll also be including The Mad Room 1969 in this lineup. Its claustrophobic tension, psycho-sexual spiral, and focus on madness and the terrors lurking within the mind make it a natural companion to Harrington’s work, fitting snugly alongside Games and What’s the Matter with Helen?

Curtis Harrington’s Games (1967) is a cocktail of psychological suspense, Gothic intrigue, and icy social satire- a film that marries Harrington’s avant-garde sensibilities with the polished veneer of studio-era Hollywood. Set in a labyrinthine Upper East Side townhouse dripping with pop art and baroque curios, the story follows Paul and Jennifer Montgomery (James Caan and Katharine Ross), a wealthy, thrill-starved couple whose penchant for macabre parlor games spirals into lethal consequences when they invite Lisa Schindler (Simone Signoret), a mysterious German cosmetics saleswoman, into their decadent world. Harrington, a maverick director who bridged underground cinema and mainstream horror, crafts a claustrophobic nightmare where identity, desire, and deception blur into a deadly charade.

It’s the pictures that got small! “Good Evening” Leading Ladies of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour Part 4

The Plot: A Deadly Masquerade:

The Montgomerys’ existence is one of curated ennui. Their home, a museum of kitsch and high art, doubles as a stage for cruel theatrics: staged séances, mock duels with antique pistols, and sadistic pranks played on guests. Lisa’s arrival, after a feigned fainting spell, disrupts their sterile routine. Claiming psychic abilities using her tarot cards, she suggests increasingly twisted “games,” including a fabricated affair between Jennifer and Norman (Don Stroud), a grocery deliveryman. What begins as a playful ruse turns fatal when Paul, wielding a pistol he believes loaded with blanks, shoots Norman in a fit of jealousy. The couple’s panic-stricken attempt to conceal the body- hoisting it via dumbwaiter, encasing it in plaster as a grotesque art piece- unravels into a cascade of paranoia, apparitions, and double-crosses. By the finale, Paul, who had been gaslighting Jennifer all along, conspiring with Lisa, winds up on the receiving end of her cool, maniacal trickery. She reveals herself as the true puppet master, orchestrating the conniving and cutthroat Paul’s poisoning to claim Jennifer’s fortune, leaving the audience to ponder who has been playing whom.

Harrington’s Legacy: From Avant-Garde to Hollywood Gothic:

Harrington, an associate of Kenneth Anger and Maya Deren, brought a subversive edge to Games. His early experimental works, like Night Tide (1961), explored existential dread through surreal imagery, a theme he transposed here into a bourgeois nightmare. While Universal marketed Games as a Hitchcockian thriller, Harrington infused it with camp irony and Freudian subtext.

The townhouse, designed by visual consultant Morton Haack, becomes a character itself: walls adorned with death-themed pinball machines (“Fatalities,” “Serious Injuries”), masks evoking commedia dell’arte, and a recurring crystal ball that refracts truth and illusion.

Harrington’s direction leans into the absurd- a hooded figure pumping a pipe organ during a faux-sacrifice, interrupted by lawyers bearing paperwork, while maintaining a suffocating tension. Critics like Roger Ebert dismissed it as “standard horror fare,” but modern reassessments praise its audacious blend of high camp and psychological horror, Harrington’s film an important forerunner in the evolution of the sophisticated, puzzle-box thriller, and a precursor to later works like Herbert Ross’s The Last of Sheila (1973).

Curtis Harrington’s most prominent work in the horror and thriller genres is distinguished by his flair for atmosphere, psychological tension, and his ability to draw extraordinary performances from legendary actresses. In Ruby (1977), Harrington cast Piper Laurie, fresh off her Oscar-nominated turn in Carrie 1976, as a former gangster’s moll haunted by her past and besieged by supernatural forces at her Florida drive-in theater. Laurie’s sultry performance is haunting and sexy, and the film is often cited as an off-beat gem that showcases Harrington’s “particular sensitivity and sympathetic eye for the vulnerability in women, much like Tennessee Williams”. The film’s grim, gritty atmosphere and supernatural setpieces, including the eerie possession of Ruby’s mute daughter, are hallmarks of Harrington’s style.

Piper Laurie: The Girl Who Ate Flowers

Equally notable, which I’ll be talking about in a sec, is What’s the Matter with Helen? (1971), a Gothic psychological thriller starring Shelley Winters and Debbie Reynolds as two mothers tormented by guilt and paranoia after their sons are convicted of murder. Harrington’s direction draws out chilling, complex performances, especially from Winters, whose descent into madness is both tragic and terrifying. The film is remembered for its stylish period detail, mounting suspense, and the way Harrington turns Hollywood nostalgia into a backdrop for psychological horror.

Throughout his career, Harrington was celebrated for revitalizing the careers of classic actresses and infusing his films with a sense of operatic melodrama and visual elegance. As Piper Laurie herself noted, working with Harrington was a “great experience,” and she praised his ability to create “complex characterizations of women in each of his films.” She told me that he was a lovely man to work with, and she thoroughly enjoyed making Ruby. Actually, she was delighted I wanted to talk about it as much as her more well-known work in Carrie!

These works are enduring testaments to Harrington’s unique voice in American horror and his gift for blending camp, tragedy, and genuine emotional depth.

The Cast: Performances of Deception and Desperation:

Simone Signoret (Lisa): Fresh off her Oscar win for Room at the Top (1958), subverts her Diabolique persona with a role both maternal and menacing. Her Lisa is a spider in a black turban, her world-weariness masking a calculating mind. For me, Signoret’s haunting presence-smoldering cigarettes, tarot card readings, and a climactic smirk-elevates the film from B-movie to high art.

Signoret stands as one of the most luminous and formidable figures in twentieth-century cinema, her career defined by a rare blend of sensuality, intelligence, and emotional depth. Born in Germany and raised in France, Signoret began her ascent during the tumultuous years of World War II, supporting her family through bit parts while hiding her Jewish heritage behind her mother’s maiden name. Her beauty was never of the conventional Hollywood variety; instead, critics and audiences alike were captivated by her earthy allure, expressive eyes, and a presence that radiated both strength and vulnerability.

Her artistry was “marked by their minimalism and restraint, relying on small gestures, her incendiary eyes, a look, a purposeful walk, and few words.”– from Philip Kemp in his essay “The Secret to Simone Signoret’s Staying Power,”

This understated power allowed her to transcend the often typecast roles of tragic seductresses and prostitutes, which she initially played in films like La Ronde (1950) and Casque d’Or (1952).

In Casque d’Or, her portrayal of Marie, a woman torn between love and danger, became iconic, earning her a BAFTA and cementing her image as a symbol of troubled desire and resilience. The British Film Institute notes that “the image of her in full belle époque styling became one of the most famous of the era,” and her ability to elevate even clichéd roles was widely recognized.

Her turn to villainy in Henri-Georges Clouzot’s Les Diaboliques (1955) displayed her range, as she embodied Nicole, the calculating femme fatale, with a chillingly lucid performance that remains a benchmark of psychological suspense.

Signoret’s international breakthrough came with Room at the Top (1959), where her nuanced, sensual portrayal of Alice Aisgill won her the Academy Award for Best Actress, the first for a non-American film, as well as the Best Female Performance Prize at Cannes. Historian assessments often highlight how she “bypassed the clichéd writing that sometimes typified such characters,” bringing complexity and humanity to every role.

Signoret’s later career was equally distinguished, with acclaimed performances, one of my favorites was in Ship of Fools (1965). She also stunned audiences with Army of Shadows (1969), Le Chat (1971), and Madame Rosa (1977), the latter earning her a César Award for her portrayal of a weary Holocaust survivor. Throughout, she remained committed to portraying strong, complex women, unafraid of aging or embracing roles that challenged societal norms. As she famously remarked, “I got old the way women who aren’t actresses grow old.”

Her legacy is not only cinematic but also cultural. Signoret was a passionate advocate for human rights; the shadows of war and resistance shaped her life and work.

As the Criterion Collection observed, she was “an actor, a mother, a politically engaged artist, a lover, and a writer,” whose performances possessed “bravery, honesty, and commitment to cinema that remained of the highest order.” Simone Signoret’s career is a testament to the enduring power of authenticity, intelligence, and emotional truth in film.

Games also feature James Caan (Paul): Pre-Godfather, Caan channels Sonny Corleone’s volatility into Paul’s petulant cruelty. His descent from smirking manipulator to frantic conspirator shines with his performance in controlled hysteria.

Katharine Ross (Jennifer): Ross, months before The Graduate (1967), embodies brittle glamour, her wide-eyed vulnerability masking a latent ruthlessness. Her final breakdown- shooting a resurrected Norman in a pitch-black room- is visceral and tragic.

The Supporting Cast includes: Don Stroud’s Norman, a pawn in the Montgomerys’ games, embodies doomed naivete. Kent Smith (Cat People) and the delightfully dotty Estelle Winwood as their neighbor. Also on board are a mix of extras that add ghoulish levity as party guests, including Harrington’s Queen of Blood 1966 space vampire, Florence Marly. At the same time, the omnipresent character actor Ian Wolfe plays the bemused doctor who anchors the madness.

Don Stroud is a cult-favorite actor known for his rugged, imposing presence and a career spanning over five decades across film and television. Discovered as a surfer in Waikiki, Stroud brought a striking 6’2″ athletic build, chiseled features, and an intense, brooding charisma to the screen, making him a natural fit for tough, often villainous roles. Critics and writers have described his style as “raw,” “volatile,” and “magnetic,” with a penchant for playing outlaws, bikers, and morally ambiguous characters. I have always found him to possess smoldering, outlaw charm and a sense that trouble and temptation ride side by side whenever he enters a room.

Among his most prominent and cult works are not just in Games (1967), but also Coogan’s Bluff (1968), Bloody Mama (1970), The Amityville Horror (1979), and the James Bond film Licence to Kill (1989).

He also made his mark on television with recurring roles in series like Hawaii Five-O, Mike Hammer, and The New Gidget. Stroud’s on-screen persona is often described as “dangerously unpredictable,” combining physicality with a sly, rebellious edge that made him a memorable presence in both mainstream and genre cinema.

Visual Alchemy: Fraker’s Cinematography and Haack’s Design:

Cinematographer William A. Fraker, later famed for Rosemary’s Baby (1968) and Bullitt (1968), paints Games in lurid hues and disorienting angles. Dutch tilts mirror the couple’s moral decay, while chiaroscuro lighting- faces half-shadowed, bodies emerging from darkness- heightens the paranoia. Fraker’s camera lingers on grotesque details: blood seeping through a shroud, a prosthetic eye dangling from Norman’s socket. The townhouse’s cluttered opulence, juxtaposing Warhol-esque pop art with Gothic relics, becomes a prison of the protagonists’ own design. A standout sequence- Jennifer’s drugged hallucination of Norman’s ghostly return- uses double exposures and jarring cuts to fracture reality, a technique Harrington honed in his experimental shorts.

A forgotten gem of psychological horror, Games bombed on release, dismissed as a Diabolique knockoff, but its legacy endures as a testament to Harrington’s singular vision. It has never lost its allure for me. It is a film about the performance of identity, of sanity, of love, where every gesture is a lie and every room a stage. Harrington, ever the outsider, skewers the emptiness of wealth and the seduction of control, curated personas, and viral deception. With its razor-sharp performances, audacious design, and Fraker’s hypnotic lens, Games remains a chilling reminder that the most dangerous monsters wear human faces- and the deadliest games are played without us knowing that there are no rules.

“The thrust of the film is to present the artist as an alchemist who, through her creative work, becomes herself transmuted into gold.” -Curtis Harrington.

WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH HELEN? 1971

Curtis Harrington’s What’s the Matter with Helen? (1971) is an overwrought, lurid, baroque descent into the anxieties and obsessions of two women bound by guilt, paranoia, and a shared brush with infamy. Set against the backdrop of 1930s Hollywood – land of faded glamour, desperate ambition, and lurking menace- Harrington’s film stands as a quintessential entry in the “grand dame guignol” cycle, but with a psychological complexity and visual elegance that mark it as one of his most personal and accomplished works.

Certainly in part because of Shelley Winters and Debbie Reynolds, who bring a remarkable duality and psychological complexity to What’s the Matter with Helen?, their screen presence is both complementary and strikingly distinct. Winters, with her brooding intensity and expressive melancholy, masterfully charts Helen’s gradual descent into paranoia and delusion; her performance is a study in mounting instability, where even the smallest gesture or shift in tone signals the character’s unraveling. Winters’ portrayal, described as “utterly mesmerizing,” imbues Helen with a tragic vulnerability that is as chilling as it is sympathetic. By the film’s denouement, the shocking revelation is an utter fevered nightmarish tableau.

I’m thrilled to announce two major upcoming features at The Last Drive In that celebrate the remarkable legacy of Shelley Winters and challenge the narrow confines of Hollywood’s so-called “hag cinema.” First, The Bloodiest Mama of Them All will be a tribute to Winters herself, a larger-than-life talent whose fearless performance in What’s the Matter with Helen? stands as a testament to her range and power. This piece will explore how Winters redefined the boundaries of screen acting, especially for women cast aside by an industry obsessed with youth.

Her work in What’s the Matter with Helen? also serves as a springboard for my second feature, Deconstructing Hag Cinema, a critical deep dive that pushes back against the pejorative label assigned to actresses who “aged out” or I should say “pushed out” of Hollywood and were relegated to campy horror roles in the wake of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? With Deconstructing Hag Cinema, I aim to reclaim and reframe these performances, spotlighting the artistry, complexity, and enduring influence of the women who made this genre unforgettable. Stay tuned for both features- coming soon to The Last Drive In.

Reynolds, meanwhile, subverts her wholesome star persona to inhabit Adelle’s brittle glamour and self-deluding ambition, revealing layers of vanity, longing, and desperation beneath the surface.

Her presence is dramatic, self-obsessed, and unexpectedly sharp, with critics noting the pleasure of seeing her play against type as a woman whose dreams of Hollywood stardom mask a deep-seated fear of irrelevance. Together, Winters and Reynolds command the screen with a sophisticated interplay: Winters’ haunted fragility and Reynolds’ performative optimism create a dynamic that is both haunting and electric, elevating the film’s gothic melodrama into a mesmerizing psychological duet, or dance – their pas de deux.

The story opens in Iowa, where Helen Hill (Shelley Winters) and Adelle Bruckner (Debbie Reynolds) are besieged by the press and public after their sons are convicted of a brutal murder. Fleeing the judgment and anonymous threats- one chillingly delivered by a man who slices Helen’s palm “to see her bleed”- the women reinvent themselves in Los Angeles, opening a dance academy for little girls whose mothers dream of Shirley Temple stardom.

With new names, platinum hair, and a veneer of optimism, Adelle and Helen attempt to escape their past, but the film’s atmosphere is thick with dread from the start.

Harrington’s genius is in how he layers this surface of Hollywood fantasy with undercurrents of repression, transferred guilt, and psychological unraveling. The dance school, with its chorus lines of precocious children and pushy stage mothers, becomes a grotesque funhouse mirror of lost innocence and thwarted dreams. Adelle, vivacious and self-deluding, quickly adapts, charming wealthy widower Lincoln Palmer (Dennis Weaver) and chasing her own vision of reinvention. Helen, by contrast, is consumed by religious guilt and paranoia, her fragile psyche haunted by visions of blood and retribution motifs that Harrington and screenwriter Henry Farrell (of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? fame) weave throughout the film, most memorably in the recurring image of Helen’s wounded, bleeding hands.

In one of the film’s most haunting flashbacks, Helen is seized by a vivid, nightmarish memory of her husband’s gruesome death in a thresher accident. The scene unfolds with a visceral intensity: Helen envisions the brutal moment when her husband is mutilated by the farm machinery, blood and violence erupting in a blur of guilt and horror. The imagery is fragmented and expressionistic, reflecting Helen’s fractured psyche, her face contorted with anguish as the mechanical violence of the accident replays in her mind. This flashback not only underscores the trauma that haunts Helen but also foreshadows her later confession that she was responsible for pushing her husband to his death, layering her present paranoia with the inescapable weight of her past sins.

The visual style, courtesy of legendary cinematographer Lucien Ballard, is lush yet claustrophobic. Ballard, known for his work with Sam Peckinpah and Stanley Kubrick, bathes the film in a sepia-tinged palette that evokes both period nostalgia and a sense of rot beneath the surface.

Lucien Ballard, widely regarded as one of Hollywood’s most accomplished cinematographers, left an indelible mark across genres and decades. Uncredited, he contributed to the visual poetry of Laura (1944), a foundational film noir whose shadowy elegance and psychological complexity helped define the noir sensibility and its visual language. In The House on Telegraph Hill (1951), Ballard’s lens heightened the film’s gothic suspense and postwar paranoia, making it one of the era’s quintessential noirs, set against the fog-draped streets of San Francisco.

31 Flavors of Noir on the Fringe to Lure you in! Part 4 The last Killing in a Lineup of unsung noir

With Stanley Kubrick’s The Killing (1956), Ballard crafted a tense, atmospheric heist thriller that broke new ground in film noir, blending documentary realism with existential dread. A Kiss Before Dying (1956) stands as a late-period noir, its sunlit exteriors and shocking violence subverting the genre’s conventions and leaving a lasting sting on audiences.

Ballard’s artistry extended to the Western, most notably with Sam Peckinpah’s Ride the High Country (1962), a revisionist take that balanced classic genre values with a new, somber realism. His work reached its zenith in The Wild Bunch (1969), where his sweeping, sun-drenched vistas and kinetic camerawork redefined the Western with unprecedented brutality and lyricism, earning Ballard the National Society of Film Critics award for Best Cinematography. Finally, The Getaway (1972) starring Steve McQueen showcased his versatility, bringing a gritty, propulsive energy to the action thriller and further cementing his legacy as a master of cinematic mood and movement.

In What’s the Matter With Helen? shadows loom, staircases twist, and mirrors reflect fractured identities, echoing the characters’ descent into madness. Harrington’s direction is both theatrical and intimate, lingering on Shelley Winters’ increasingly unhinged performance as Helen’s grip on reality slips. Debbie Reynolds, cast against type, brings a brittle glamour and cunning to Adelle, her optimism shading into self-preservation and, ultimately, complicity in the film’s spiral of violence.

The supporting cast adds further texture: Micheál Mac Liammóir is memorably sinister as Hamilton Starr, the elocution coach whose ambiguous motives unsettle both women, while Agnes Moorehead’s radio evangelist Sister Alma offers an austere, false comfort to Helen’s spiritual torment. The film’s set pieces- Helen’s hallucinations backstage at the recital, the murder and disposal of a would-be avenger, the slaughter of Helen’s beloved rabbits- are staged with a mix of Gothic excess and psychological realism that is pure Harrington.

What makes What’s the Matter with Helen? so unique within the psychological thriller and “hagsploitation” genres is its empathy for its damaged protagonists. Rather than simply exploiting their unraveling for shock, Harrington probes the loneliness, guilt, and desperation that drive them. The film’s climax- Helen, having murdered Adelle in a jealous frenzy, playing “Goody Goody” on the piano for Adelle’s corpse, dressed in a child’s dance costume- is both grotesque and heartbreaking, a tableau of madness that lingers long after the credits roll. This lasting, grisly snapshot stuck with me days after seeing the film in its original theatrical run -and for years beyond. Its power is such that it imprints itself on the memory, refusing to fade.

Harrington’s legacy is that of a director who brought a painter’s eye and a poet’s sensitivity to genre filmmaking. His work, from the dreamy Night Tide to the campy menace of Whoever Slew Auntie Roo?, also starring Winters, is marked by atmosphere, psychological depth, and an ability to elicit career-best performances from his stars.

What’s the Matter with Helen? is perhaps his most personal film-a meditation on guilt, female friendship, and the price of survival in a world that punishes women for both their sins and their suffering.

Though the film was compromised by studio interference- Harrington lamented the loss of his preferred dissolves and the toning down of the murder scene to secure a GP rating- it remains a visually sumptuous, emotionally resonant work. Critics at the time were divided, but the film has since been reclaimed as a cult classic, its blend of Gothic melodrama, psychological horror, and Hollywood satire as potent now as it was unsettling then. It has not lost any of its disturbing impact and knack for provoking unease.

In the end, What’s the Matter with Helen? is a tragic masquerade, a cautionary tale about the impossibility of escaping one’s past, and a showcase for Harrington’s singular vision – a vision haunted by lost ideals, painted in blood and shadow, and illuminated by the flickering hope of redemption.

THE MAD ROOM 1969

Bernard Girard’s The Mad Room (1969) is a brooding, atmospheric entry in the late-1960s cycle of psychological thrillers that probe the darkness lurking within the domestic sphere.

Loosely adapted from the 1941 noir Ladies in Retirement, the film is reimagined for a more sensational era, blending gothic suspense, familial trauma, and the corrosive effects of secrets into a single, claustrophobic narrative. At its heart is Ellen Hardy, played with wide-eyed intensity by Stella Stevens, a poised but increasingly fragile young woman whose carefully constructed world begins to unravel with the return of her troubled siblings.

Ladies in Retirement (1941) Though this be madness

Ellen serves as a live-in assistant to the wealthy, eccentric Mrs. Gladys Armstrong, portrayed by Shelley Winters in another one of her signature late-career roles. Winters brings to the part a brittle authority and sly humor, her presence both domineering and oddly sympathetic- a matriarch whose suspicions are as sharp as her tongue. Ellen’s plans to marry Mrs. Armstrong’s stepson, Sam, are thrown into chaos when she is summoned to retrieve her younger siblings, George and Mandy, from the mental institution where they’ve been confined since childhood, after being suspected of the brutal murder of their parents. Desperate to keep their past a secret, Ellen persuades Mrs. Armstrong to let George and Mandy stay in the mansion, fabricating a story about a dying uncle.

From the moment the siblings arrive, a sense of unease takes hold. Mandy, played with unnerving innocence by Barbara Sammeth, insists on having a “mad room” – a private space to vent frustration and anxiety, echoing the siblings’ institutional upbringing. Ellen reluctantly allows them access to Mr. Armstrong’s forbidden study, deepening the house’s atmosphere of secrets and locked doors. The mansion itself, shot by cinematographer Harry Stradling Jr., becomes a labyrinth of shadowy corridors and cluttered relics, its claustrophobic interiors amplifying the psychological tension that simmers among the characters.

One of the film’s most unsettling motifs is the use of gore and bloody imagery as a form of disturbed expression, most memorably, when blood is used to daub crude, childlike finger painting flowers on the walls of the mansion. These painted flowers, rendered in vivid red, are both grotesque and eerily innocent, their cheerful shapes clashing with the violence of their creation. The sight of these sanguine blooms transforms the domestic space into a nightmarish tableau, blurring the line between trauma and art, and serving as a haunting visual reminder that madness and violence lurk just beneath the surface of the everyday. This motif lingers in the mind, its disquieting effect amplified by the tension between the innocence of the imagery and the horror of its medium.

As Mrs. Armstrong’s suspicions mount, the film’s suspense tightens. Ellen’s increasingly desperate lies and erratic behavior raise the possibility that she may be more unstable than she appears. The tension erupts one night when Mrs. Armstrong is found dead in the “mad room,” her throat slashed by a saber.

In a panic, Ellen orchestrates a cover-up, telling the staff that Mrs. Armstrong has left on business and hiding the body- a macabre charade that unravels with the discovery of the family dog carrying a severed hand through the estate’s manicured grounds. The siblings, meanwhile, turn on each other, accusing one another of murder, while Ellen’s own sanity teeters on the brink.

The supporting cast adds further texture: Michael Burns plays George with a blend of inscrutability and suppressed menace, while Beverly Garland’s scene-stealing turn as the drunken, embittered Mrs. Racine injects the film with a jolt of Grand Guignol camp. Yet it is Stevens and Winters who anchor the film, their performances oscillating between vulnerability and ferocity, fear and calculation.

What sets The Mad Room apart is its ability to sustain a mood of dread and ambiguity. The film never fully embraces the madness its premise promises, but it simmers with the threat of violence, the weight of repressed trauma, and the ever-present possibility of collapse. Its focus on damaged women, family secrets, and the thin veneer of respectability aligns it with contemporaneous works like What’s the Matter with Helen? and Whoever Slew Auntie Roo?, assuring its cult status among fans of domestic Gothic and camp-inflected thrillers.

Though sometimes criticized for its uneven tone and missed opportunities for deeper psychological exploration, The Mad Room remains a compelling artifact of its era- a chamber piece of paranoia, repression, and melodramatic menace, elevated by committed performances and a suffocating sense of doom. It is a film that lingers on the edge of madness, never quite plunging in, but always threatening to do so, leaving us with a disquiting feeling of dis-ease and an uncomfortable sense that the true horror lies not in the supernatural, but in the secrets we keep and the rooms kept lock inside ourselves.

#65 down, 85 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #64 Freaks 1932 & The Unknown 1927

SPOILER ALERT!

FREAKS 1932

Freaks 1932 is exactly the kind of film that demands a sensitive, deep dive at The Last Drive In- not just because of its notoriety or its place in horror history, but because it’s a work that still challenges, unsettles, and provokes nearly a century after its release. This film is more than just a curiosity; it’s a cinematic canvas for projection, a piece of art that forces us to confront our biases and the boundaries of empathy, spectacle, and exploitation. I want to peel back the layers of Browning’s legacy, the lived experiences of the cast, and the film’s turbulent journey from reviled oddity to revered classic. I will most likely do a double feature with the following film, Chaney’s The Unknown 1927.

Tod Browning’s Freaks (1932) stands as a defiant anomaly in cinematic history- a film that dared to confront societal norms with unflinching audacity, only to be rejected by its era before being resurrected as a cult masterpiece. Born from Browning’s own circus past and his fascination with the marginalized, the film is a haunting blend of horror and humanity, a narrative that forces viewers to grapple with their discomfort while paradoxically humanizing those deemed “monstrous.”

Set in a traveling circus, the story centers on Cleopatra, a venomous trapeze artist who seduces the wealthy little person (midget was a term used during the Victorian era through much of the 20th century and has roots that many find dehumanizing and derogatory), Hans, conspiring with her lover Hercules (Henry Victor) to poison him and seize his fortune.

When the titular “freaks” uncover her betrayal, they exact a revenge as visceral as it is poetic, transforming her into a grotesque spectacle-a chicken-woman hybrid-in one of cinema’s most chilling finales. It is still a challenging scene to take in. Browning, fresh off the success of Dracula (1931), aimed to out-horror Universal’s monsters by casting real sideshow performers: conjoined twins Daisy and Violet Hilton, microcephalic Schlitzie, limbless Johnny Eck, and others. These were not actors in makeup but individuals whose bodies defied societal ideals, a choice that shattered the fourth wall of voyeuristic spectacle.

The production was steeped in contradiction. MGM, the studio of glamour, greenlit Browning’s vision but balked at its execution. The cast, proud, flawed, and fiercely individual, were sequestered in tents, barred from the studio commissary after F. Scott Fitzgerald reportedly vomited upon seeing the Hilton sisters dine. Yet Browning, himself a carny at heart, treated them with camaraderie, even as their professional rivalries flared.

Cinematographer Merritt B. Gerstad’s stark framing oscillates between empathy and unease: close-ups linger on the freaks’ laughter and camaraderie, while wide shots emphasize their Otherness amidst the carnival’s shadows. “We accept her, we accept her, one of us, one of us. Gooble gobble, gooble gobble. We accept her, we accept her, one of us, one of us!”

This duality mirrors the film’s core tension: Is it exploitation or empowerment? Contemporary audiences recoiled, branding it “grotesque” and “brutal.” MGM slashed the runtime from 90 to 64 minutes, excising scenes like the original “happy ending” where the freaks are wealthy and integrated into society. The studio’s promotional tagline-“Can a full-grown woman love a midget?”– underscored their cynical marketing, even as Browning insisted on the characters’ humanity. Critics lambasted it; The New York Times called it “so revolting it becomes interesting,” while British censors banned it for 30 years. The backlash crippled Browning’s career, leaving him a recluse until his death in 1962.

Yet Freaks refused to die. Rediscovered in the 1960s by countercultural audiences and European cinephiles, it was hailed as a subversive triumph. Derek Malcolm later deemed it “one of the masterpieces of baroque cinema,” a “damning antidote to the cult of physical perfection.” Its moral clarity, the true monsters are the “normal.”

Cleopatra and Hercules resonated with postmodern sensibilities, reframing it as a radical indictment of societal cruelty. The National Film Registry enshrined it in 1994, recognizing its raw power to unsettle and illuminate. Today, Freaks endures as a Rorschach test: a horror film that terrifies not with monsters but with its demand that we see ourselves in the Other. Browning’s legacy, once buried by outrage, now rests on this audacious paradox- a film that mirrors our capacity for both revulsion and redemption.

Browning should have lived to witness the admiration his work now receives, celebrated for the very qualities once met with skepticism, pushed to the margins, and misunderstood. Now, his work is cherished by generations who have found the poetry in it. Recognized for its bravery and artistry, it’s celebrated for the very things that once made it so controversial.

Beneath the canvas shadows of a traveling circus, Freaks unfolds like a fever dream- a wondrous and cruel world where the margins of humanity are drawn and redrawn in sawdust and candlelight. Hans stands at the heart of the narrative, a gentle-souled little person, whose devotion to the radiant trapeze artist Cleopatra becomes the axis of tragedy. Cleopatra, all glitter and guile, toys with Hans’s affections, her laughter a blade that slices through the fragile peace of the sideshow community. Her secret lover, the brutish strongman Hercules, is her co-conspirator, and together they hatch a plan to poison Hans and steal his inheritance, their “normalcy” masking a monstrous intent.

Russian actress Olga Baclanova, with her striking, statuesque looks and commanding presence, specialized in portraying exotic, seductive femme fatales, often exuding a blend of glamour and cruelty that made her a natural fit for the role of the manipulative trapeze artist Her acting style was expressive and theatrical, shaped by her roots in Russian silent cinema, where she was known as the “Russian Tigress.” Baclanova’s other most famous film is The Man Who Laughs (1928), in which she plays the alluring and morally ambiguous Duchess Josiana opposite Conrad Veidt’s tragic hero.

The circus is alive with its own poetry: the Bearded Lady cradles her newborn, the conjoined Hilton twins share a dance, and the “Living Torso” lights a cigarette with matchstick precision. These moments of everyday tenderness and camaraderie glimmer between the cracks of spectacle, their humanity rendered in gestures both small and profound.

But the heart of the film beats loudest at the infamous wedding feast- a raucous, rain-soaked banquet where the “freaks,” in a chorus of unity, chant hoisting a loving cup, “One of us! One of us!” to welcome Cleopatra. Their joy curdles as she recoils in horror, hurling wine and insults, her revulsion echoing throughout the world. Cleopatra recoils in disgust and unleashes her infamous tirade at the assembled performers: “You dirty, slimy, freaks! Freaks, freaks, freaks! You fools! Make me one of you, will you?”

From that moment, the air thickens with dread. Hans, now gravely ill, is watched over by the ever-vigilant freaks, their childlike innocence replaced by a silent, collective resolve. Storm clouds gather as the circus caravans roll through the mud, the freaks crawling and slithering beneath the wagons, knives glinting in the darkness. Cleopatra’s attempt to finish her deadly work is thwarted; confronted by Hans and his protectors, she flees into the tempest, pursued by a crawling, relentless legion-“Offend one and you offend them all.” Hercules, meanwhile, meets his own fate at the hands of those he scorned, his screams lost in the rain.

The film’s final vision is pure nightmare poetry: Cleopatra, once the “Peacock of the Air,” is now a grotesque “human chicken,” tarred and feathered, her limbs mutilated, her beauty erased, squawking for the gawking crowds. The true monsters, Browning insists, are not those born different, but those who wield cruelty as a weapon.

In a quiet coda, Hans, shattered by guilt and loss, is visited by his former fiancée Frieda, who absolves him with a whispered “I love you,” the film’s last, redemptive breath. Frieda, portrayed with luminous tenderness by Daisy Earles, is the gentle soul of Freaks- her unwavering compassion, quiet dignity, and deep loyalty shine through every glance and gesture, embodying the film’s heart with a softness that endures even in the face of heartbreak and betrayal.

Freaks is a dark carnival ballad- a tale of innocence betrayed, vengeance wrought, and the fragile, luminous dignity of those the world would rather not see. Its images linger like the echo of a distant calliope: rain on canvas, knives in mud, and the mournful, unblinking gaze of those who have survived both spectacle and scorn.

THE UNKNOWN 1927

In the shadowed heart of the silent era, The Unknown (1927) emerges as a feverish, poetic symphony of obsession, deception, and bodily sacrifice- a film that distills the essence of both Lon Chaney’s transformative genius and Tod Browning’s fascination with the grotesque margins of humanity. Their sixth collaboration, set beneath the swirling canvas of a Spanish gypsy circus, is a haunting meditation on the lengths to which we will mutilate ourselves for love, and the dark ironies that fate reserves for those who dare to defy their own nature.

Lon Chaney, the “Man of a Thousand Faces,” delivers one of his most astonishing performances as Alonzo the Armless, a carnival knife-thrower whose act is as much a masquerade as it is a marvel. Chaney’s mastery of physical transformation- here achieved not with elaborate makeup but with a torturous harness that binds his arms to his torso- transcends mere illusion. He eats, drinks, smokes, and performs with his feet, conjuring a portrait of extraordinary characterization that is both mesmerizing and deeply unsettling. Yet Alonzo’s greatest secret is not his apparent lack of arms, but the double thumb on his left hand- a telltale mark of his criminal past. In a world where identity is a matter of survival, he hides his arms not only from the circus audience but from the law, his love, and ultimately, himself.

The object of his desperate longing is Nanon, played by a luminous, eighteen-year-old Joan Crawford in her first major role. Nanon’s beauty is shadowed by a pathological fear of men’s hands- a trauma that renders her vulnerable to Alonzo’s armless embrace and repulsed by the touchy advances of Malabar the Strongman (Norman Kerry). The circus becomes a stage for psychological theater: Alonzo’s knife-throwing act is both a courtship and a dance with death, the blade spinning ever closer to the woman he adores, as if love itself were a matter of precision and restraint.

Browning’s direction, paired with Merritt B. Gerstad’s painterly cinematography, imbues the film with a suffocating, dreamlike atmosphere. Characters drift toward and away from the camera, their movements echoing the dizzying choreography of the circus ring. The world is a carousel of blurred passions and hidden wounds, where every gesture is freighted with meaning and every secret is a ticking bomb.

The revelation of Alonzo’s arms-unstrapped in the privacy of his caravan by his loyal dwarf assistant Cojo (John George)-is a moment of almost unbearable intimacy, a stripping away of both physical and emotional armor.

Spare yet loaded with symbolic weight, the film’s narrative spirals toward its infamous climax. When Nanon’s father, the ringmaster Zanzi (Nick De Ruiz), discovers Alonzo’s secret, he is murdered in a fit of panic, witnessed only by Nanon, who sees the killer’s double thumb but not his face. To ensure both his freedom and Nanon’s love, Alonzo conceives a plan of almost mythic self-destruction: he blackmails a surgeon into amputating his arms for real, believing this sacrifice will make him worthy of Nanon’s affection and erase the evidence of his crime.

But fate, in Browning’s universe, is never so kind. During Alonzo’s convalescence, Malabar’s gentle persistence cures Nanon’s phobia, and Alonzo returns to find the woman he mutilated himself for now happily in the arms of another.

The final act is a Grand Guignol ballet of revenge and despair. Alonzo, unhinged by jealousy and loss, sabotages Malabar’s circus act, only to be crushed- literally and figuratively- by the very forces he sought to control. The image of Chaney’s Alonzo, weeping in agony as he realizes the futility of his sacrifice, is among the most emotionally raw in silent cinema, a tableau of unrequited love rendered as emotional amputation.

Burt Lancaster would later call it “one of the most compelling and emotionally exhausting scenes I have ever seen an actor do.”

Chaney’s legacy, forged in the crucible of films like The Unknown, is that of an artist who made suffering visible, who found nobility in the grotesque and pathos in the monstrous. His performances, whether as Quasimodo, the Phantom, or Alonzo, are not simply exercises in shock but in empathy- a reminder, as Chaney himself wrote, that “the lowest types of humanity may have within them the capacity for supreme self-sacrifice.”

Browning, too, is revealed here as a poet of the abnormal, a director who understood that the circus ring is a mirror for the human soul, its dramas both larger than life and achingly intimate.

The Unknown was met with both fascination and revulsion upon release. Critics marveled at Chaney’s virtuosity-his ability to eat, drink, and smoke with his feet, his wrenching facial expressions unmasked by makeup-and recoiled from the film’s “gruesome” subject matter.

Modern audiences and scholars have reclaimed it as a masterpiece of psychological horror and silent cinema, its influence echoing through the decades in the work of directors drawn to the intersection of body and identity, love and mutilation.

To watch The Unknown is to enter a world where love is a knife’s edge, where the boundaries of the self are as mutable as the shadows under the big top, and where the true horror is not in disfigurement but in the lengths we go to be seen, to be loved, and to belong. It is a film that lingers like a phantom limb, a testament to the enduring power of Chaney’s artistry and Browning’s dark, poetic vision.

#64 down, 86 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #63 The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake 1959 & The Thing that Wouldn’t Die 1958

THE FOUR SKULLS OF JONATHAN DRAKE 1959

The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959)-My lips are sealed, or “only the evil that men do, live after them!”

Let’s take a delightfully campy, tongue-in-cheek stroll through two of the kookiest crypt-crawlers the 1950s ever coughed up: The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959) and The Thing That Wouldn’t Die (1958). Both are proof that sometimes the best chills come with a wink, a nudge, a pair of sandals made from 200-year-old skin from a walking dead tribal witch doctor, and a severed head in a box.

The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake (1959), is a treasure brought to you by one of my favorite directors of the campy, the schlocky, and glorious B fare: Edward L. Cahn (Creature with the Atom Brain 1955, The She-Creature 1956, Invasion of the Saucer Men 1957, The Zombies of Mora Tau 1957, Invisible Invaders 1959 and my particular favorite It!, the Terror from Beyond Space 1958). The film stars Eduard Franz, Valerie French, Henry Daniell, Grant Richards, and Paul Wexler. It’s the macabre family tradition-every Drake man who hits sixty gets a complimentary disappearing head and a reserved spot in the crypt’s exclusive skull collection, all courtesy of a vengeful Jivaro shaman with a grudge that just won’t quit. A curse and a zombie with lips sewn shut (played by Paul Wexler, who looks like he had a run-in with an unoiled sewing machine).

Anthropologist Jonathan Drake (Eduard Franz, a man who’s seen one shrunken head too many) is next on the chopping block. After his brother’s head goes missing, in this family, losing your head isn’t just a figure of speech- it’s practically a rite of passage. Jonathan and his plucky daughter Alison (Valerie French) team up with a skeptical cop (Grant Richards) to unravel the mystery. The culprit? Dr. Emil Zurich (the wooden faced Henry Daniell, as sinister ever), who’s been keeping himself alive by swapping heads and dabbling in immortality, with the help of Zutai, the world’s surliest and most persistent zombie who makes vocalizations like Curly Howard of the Three Stooges when he’s hit with a bullet.

Key moments include Zutai’s stealthy rose-trellis climbs, heads turning up in crypts, and a police investigation where the only thing more suspicious than the deaths is the décor. The film’s atmosphere is pure Halloween fun: theremin music, foggy crypts, and enough skulls to make Hamlet jealous. In the end, The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake is less a whodunit and more a head-spinning carousel of curses, shrunken noggins, and stitched-lip zombies, all whirling around a family tree that’s overdue for some serious vengeful pruning.

Like a fever dream conjured by Edgar Allan Poe after a late-night binge on jungle adventure comics, the film barrels toward its climax with the subtlety of a headhunter at a flea market rummaging for skulls where immortality is just a stitch away, and the only thing more dangerous than the villain’s voodoo is the risk of losing your head before the credits roll.

THE THING THAT WOULDN’T DIE 1958

Directed by Will Cowan and starring William Reynolds, Carolyn Kearney, Robin Hughes, and Andra Martin. If you’ve ever wondered what would happen if a psychic ranch girl, a box of evil, and a 16th-century Satanist’s head walked into a California dude ranch, wonder no more. The Thing That Wouldn’t Die answers the question nobody asked: “How long can you keep a head in centuries-old, sealed wooden crate before things get weird?”

Jessica (Carolyn Kearney), who can find water with a stick and has trouble with her psychic powers, unearths a centuries-old box on her aunt’s ranch. Instead of Spanish doubloons, out pops the still-living head of Gideon Drew (Robin Hughes a low-budget svengali with hypnotic eyebrows). Yes, Robin Hughes is the actor who plays the Devil, credited as The Howling Man, in the Twilight Zone‘s “The Howling Man,” Season 2, Episode 5, which aired in 1960. He portrays the mysterious prisoner held by monks, who is revealed through a memorable transformation scene as Satan himself.

Back to the head – Drew’s head that is, separated from his body by Sir Francis Drake, proceeds to telepathically possess ranch guests and staff, who dutifully tote him around.

Highlights include the head’s uncanny ability to hypnotize with a glare, a parade of characters getting possessed faster than you can say “hilarious head in a box horror,” and a climax where the villain’s head is finally reunited with his body-only to be foiled by a fleur-de-lis amulet and a hero who apparently read the script’s last page. The ending is so abrupt you’ll wonder if the editor just got bored and left for lunch, but not before giving us the immortal lesson: The thing that wouldn’t die… actually could, and did, with a little help from some Catholic jewelry.

Both films are like haunted house rides at a county fair- creaky, a little rickety, but full of charm and the kind of scares that are best enjoyed with a bowl of popcorn and a group of wisecracking friends. Whether you’re dodging shrunken heads or ducking a telepathic noggin, these B-movie gems prove that in the world of 1950s horror, the only thing more dangerous than a curse is the set decorator’s imagination!

#63 down 87 to go! Your EverLovin Joey, formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!