MonsterGirl’s 150 Days of Classic Horror #147 The Wicker Man 1973 & The Blood on Satan’s Claw 1971

THE WICKER MAN 1973

Songs of Summer Isle: Where Old Gods Dance and New Faith Burns

There are films that rattle the senses, and then there are films like The Wicker Man, proto-folk horror gold, both a stunning treasure and a vessel, preserving and displaying the sacred, even haunting heart of folk horror, forever pulsing with a strange, ritualistic life that refuses to be confined by genre or tradition.

Robin Hardy’s 1973 masterpiece burns with pagan radiance, its pastoral serenity and lilting folk songs like honeysuckle on the fence of a field where something dreadful waits, ancient groves and orchard boughs. Harry Waxman’s idyllic visual atmosphere is a key part of the film’s eerie charm, creating a deceptive sense of pastoral beauty that masks the ominous undercurrents of the story. To call this a mere horror film is to miss the urgent energy thrumming beneath every single carefully thought-out frame, as if the island of Summerisle itself sings with the old gods, eerily self-assured, bawdy, reborn in every firelit dance and Summerisle’s fading apple groves.

Into this sun-drenched embrace steps Sergeant Neil Howie (Edward Woodward), a mainland policeman as rigid and upright as the iron cross he clings to. Dispatched to this remote Scottish isle in search of the missing girl Rowan Morrison, Howie finds himself an exile, his Christian certainty jarred at every turn by the utopian anarchy of Summerisle, where children laugh as they twine the Maypole and the villagers’ sensual rituals resonate with the pulse of pagan spring. Free love sprawls in the fields, and rites of fertility are celebrated not behind closed doors but beneath the open sky, naked and jubilant as the flames leaping to incite the land to birth.

Howie, part Puritan hero, part unwelcome blasphemer, roams this world as both judge and uncomprehending witness. He moves through sun-dappled groves and firelit ceremonies, his stern abstinence standing in starker contrast with every uninhibited celebration. At the center and in opposition to Howie, reigns Lord Summerisle (Christopher Lee), regal and wry, whose hair bears the fierce grandeur of a lion’s mane, who guides the island’s pageant of faith with the amused tolerance of a priest and the crafty calculation of a sorcerer. For Howie, every answer sparks only further confusion, his faith tested against a community whose beliefs, rooted in the cycle of earth and sun, harvest and rebirth, seem both radically alien and unnervingly ancient.

Music weaves the villagers together: rowdy pub songs, haunting hymns to nature, the eerily sweet “Maypole Song” sung by children learning about death as merely another turning of the wheel. And most evocatively set to the film’s pulse is the muse, Britt Ekland’s character Willow, who enchants with a hypnotic sensuality, her body swaying against the wall tempting Howie, to the haunting strains of “Sumer Is Icumen In,” a timeless medieval melody arranged by Paul Giovanni. This dance, a silent spell woven through shadow and light, beckons Howie not just with flesh but with the ancient rites of desire. Later, as a young boy loses his virginity to Willow, the music deepens, an intimate, trembling passage ‘Gently Johnny’ marking the painful initiation into manhood, underscored by Giovanni’s ethereal, unsettling score that calls us back to the seductive, dangerous pulse of nature’s oldest rhythms. The land feels alive, the boundary between flesh and field dissolving in scenes of maypole dances and orgiastic celebration. Here, faith is written into evocative mask and burning pyre, and for Howie, the revelation comes too late, the logic of sacrifice inexorable. He is to be the lamb led not by cruelty but by the primal conviction of those who truly believe.

At last, crowned the fool, Howie is led to his fated appointment: the towering wicker man that gives the film its name. Here is horror wrought not from monsters or fiends, but from ideals and rituals, as Howie’s prayers echo against the Summerislers’ songs and the harvest’s promise hangs in the air like the scent of rotting apples and spring blossoms. In this final moment, Howie stands not as martyr or savior, but as the unwitting offering, his voice rising in psalm as the flames claim both flesh and faith, consumed by the gods old and new.

The Wicker Man endures because it refuses easy answers. Pagan rites and Christian conviction collide on Summerisle’s shore in a primal contest that is as much about fear and desire as it is about faith. The land and its traditions are neither villain nor victim; they are the soil from which horror and beauty both grow. And as the smoke rises, folk song mingling with the screams of sacrifice, we are left on that threshold, haunted, shocked, exhilarated, questioning whether any faith, when absolute, can survive the wild, ungovernable earth.

Within the next days or so here at The Last Drive In, I’ll be slipping beneath the willow boughs and stepping deep into Summerisle’s fiery green heart, following the echo of Maypole songs and the flickering firelight that stokes ancient rites still pulsing with untamed spirit. I’ll wander alongside the island’s strange celebrations, from the innocent, sweet songs of children weaving their dances, to the fierce and carnal energy of nighttime fertility rites, where bodies move free and flames climb toward the night sky. I’ll trace the old ways through sacred fields and waters, where every flowering branch shelters secrets of transformation and duty, and every festival hums with the breath of ancient gods. Get ready for a journey where primal masks are worn and sacrifices kindled, where the air holds a yearning, because in The Wicker Man, the old paths never disappear. They lie smoldering beneath the ash, waiting to burst back into flame, calling us again and again to a world where nature, desire, and faith collide in haunting, beautiful mystery.

Stay tuned. Very soon, in the next week or so, I’ll be setting fire beneath my words for a film that carries an eternal flame of visual fascination. The Wicker Man’s haunting melody has sung to me across the years, not for the moments of shock but for its evocative power: the eerie beauty of its music, the striking boldness of its imagery, and the quietly persistent voice that calls to something deep within me.

THE BLOOD ON SATAN’S CLAW 1971

For me, Piers Haggard’s 1971 film The Blood on Satan’s Claw really stands out as a key film in British folk horror, a genre that fused rural setting with occult dread to profound and unsettling effect. Haggard, who worked primarily in television, crafted a deliberately atmospheric period piece set in early 18th-century England, a time when superstition and emerging Enlightenment rationalism clashed amid the countryside’s isolation. The screenplay, originally penned by Robert Wynne-Simmons as an anthology called Satan’s Skin, was reshaped by Haggard into a cohesive narrative that explores the eruption of a demonic curse following the discovery of a distorted, fur-covered demonic hand by local farmer Ralph Gower (Barry Andrews), which becomes the source of the evil influence spreading through the village.

This eerie find unleashes a creeping possession among the village’s young people, particularly a sinister coven led by the enigmatic Angel Blake (Linda Hayden), whose witchcraft and cult rituals swell into violent acts of sacrifice, murder, and sexual corruption.

Visually, the film owes much to the expressive cinematography of Dick Bush, whose painterly compositions and low angles emphasize the wild, pastoral landscapes of the Chiltern Hills, integrating natural beauty with visceral dread. The look is sunlit yet unnerving, infusing the English countryside with a palpable sense of looming evil, where ancient trees and ruined churches become crucibles for diabolical rites. The haunting score by Marc Wilkinson further saturates the atmosphere, underscoring everything with unsettling melodies that enhance the mixing of pagan mystique and brutal hysteria.

Bush is known for his inventive and visually arresting work. Beyond The Blood on Satan’s Claw, some of his notable credits include Ken Russell’s Savage Messiah (1972), Mahler (1974), and Tommy (1975). He also worked on Sorcerer (1977), directed by William Friedkin, which is widely considered a remake or a close adaptation of The Wages of Fear (Le Salaire de la peur), the 1953 French film directed by Henri-Georges Clouzot. Bush also shot The Philadelphia Experiment (1984) and Russell’s The Lair of the White Worm (1988), a film I recently discussed here.

The story unfolds gradually: after Ralph’s gruesome discovery and the judge’s (Patrick Wymark) initial dismissal, unsettling incidents escalate, Rosalind Barton (Tamara Ustinov) descends into madness, and after a disturbing experience in the attic room, she is attacked by a creature, with a scene where she later reveals a demonic claw instead of a normal hand.

Children grow patches of fur symbolizing their possession and corruption; Angel’s seductions and control lead to ritualistic games and gruesome murders, including the death of young Mark Vespers. Most notably, the group captures and brutally assaults Cathy Vespers, Mark’s sister, during a harrowing ritual at the church ruins, where she is murdered while being flayed of the fur patches symbolizing the demon’s skin.

The village’s futile attempts to reason with or contain the spreading darkness further illustrate the theme of failed authority and escalating chaos, which culminates with the return of the London judge (Wymark), who, after studying witchcraft texts, adopts a pragmatic yet open stance combining Enlightenment skepticism with occult horror.

The judge’s approach combines disbelief with ritual knowledge as he confronts the demonic Behemoth with a giant cross-sword hybrid weapon, when it finally bursts forth in its full monstrous embodiment, a primal, furred terror reclaimed from ancient darkness, towering and unstoppable, the very embodiment of nature’s wrath and demonic fury turned into flesh—impaling and incinerating the creature to lift the infernal curse.

The film’s tone is disturbing and unsettling, blending horror with a critique of social order, gender dynamics, and the tension between old pagan beliefs and modern rationalism. Its treatment of satanic cult worship echoed the early 1970s’ fascination and panic around occult practices, marking it as an influential piece in the folk horror tradition alongside Witchfinder General 1968 and The Wicker Man 1973. The raw depiction of youth corrupted by evil is often expressed through chilling sexual violence and the eerie sense of communal paranoia, offering a potent, if sometimes uncomfortable, reflection on control, fear, and repression in rural England.

Linda Hayden’s Angel embodies a chilling blend of innocent allure and merciless darkness. Patrick Wymark is perfect as the Judge, conveying the conflicted figure of the Enlightenment man battling forces he neither fully believes nor can dismiss.

The Blood on Satan’s Claw has stayed with me for its visually striking, thematically complex narrative, a classic of British folk horror, notable for its distinctive blend of superstition, resignation, the historical setting, atmospheric dread, and exploration of the era’s cultural tensions. I’m drawn to the way it portrays witchcraft not just as a supernatural threat but as a symbol of societal anxieties about youth, sexuality, and the uneasy transition from old-world beliefs to modernity.

#147 down, 3 to go! Your EverLovin’ Joey formally & affectionately known as MonsterGirl!

The Psychopath 1966 – I Have My Doll Now!

Dolls, with their lifeless gazes, imprint in our collective phobias and on Robert Bloch’s & Amicus’s narrative “” and like clowns, and zombie children– dolls have always given us a dreadful feeling of unease that lingers in our psyche. It’s their dead stare and their cold watchful eyes – like soulless little polymer devils. Cinematographer/ Director Freddie Francis who previously worked at Hammer, makes use of the accursed doppelgänger dolls as macabre iconography. Bloch likely viewed the British-based Amicus as the substantial alternative worth embracing, signing a three-picture deal with Paramount.

Horror filmmakers have explored this causality of jitters for decades. In Amicus’s The Psychopath 1966 – it is the symbology of dolls that gives the film its creepy attraction to what is essentially a crime drama and creative whodunnit with a few unsettling moments while trying to unravel a tale of a homicidal maniac who leaves a unique signature””the very likeness of the victims.

The Psychopath was made midway in the decade, featuring the mellifluous tagline “A New Peak in Shriek.” The film marks Freddie Francis’s foray into colour psycho-thrillers. With its use of vibrant reds, it’s a departure from his previous repertoire of haunting black-and-white psychological horror tales crafted for the illustrious Hammer.

Elisabeth Lutyen’s beautifully carnivalesque score washes over the opening as dismembered doll parts accompany the credits. The film sticks to the classic crime procedural script, but it’s not afraid to paint it with a touch of horror, throwing in the voodoo-like doll motif for that extra dash of macabre flair. It’s your standard crime fare, just with a wicked twist. Bloch’s script presents the crimes using the doll fetish in such a way that remains formulaic, though it does succeed in having a moody impact by the end.

Continue reading “The Psychopath 1966 – I Have My Doll Now!”

A Trailer a Day Keeps the Boogeyman Away! Halloween A-Z

P

Pharaoh’s Curse 1957

Pharaoh’s Curse is a 1957 American horror film directed by Lee Sholem (Tobor the Great and Superman and the Mole Men)

Character actor George N Neise plays the obsessed archaeologist Robert Quentin as part of a team of American archaeologists who unwittingly awaken a three-thousand-year-old ancient curse while excavating the tomb of a Pharaoh that is rumored to be cursed. Unlike the embodiment of the traditional mummy in the Universal franchise, one of the expedition members (Alvaro Guillot) falls prey to the vengeful spirit of the mummy seeking revenge on those who have desecrated his tomb. It needs to feed on fresh blood to sustain itself which makes it more vampiric than a mummified fiend. Rather than its victims being strangled by rotting bandaged hands, they are left with bite marks on their throats and an odd trace of mold on their necks.

The film starts off at a British outpost nestled in the heart of Egypt. An officer receives strict orders to locate an unsanctioned archaeological expedition and compel them to return to Cairo promptly. En route this small contingent of British soldiers crosses paths with an eccentric Egyptian woman who cryptically warns of dire consequences should they fail to halt the expedition in its tracks. But when they arrive at their destination it’s too late. The archaeologists have not only stumbled upon the tomb of the Pharaoh but have also dared to unseal it, unleashing a malevolent force, and one of the expedition members undergoes a ghastly transformation into a creepy old geezer in pajamas resembling a desiccated mummy-like figure that can't seemingly be killed.

Pharaoh’s Curse stars Mark Dana as Captain Storm, Diane Brewster as Sylvia Quentin, Ziva Rodann (Macumba Love 1960) as Simira, Ben Wright, and Terence de Marney as Sgt Smolett.

Paranoiac 1963

Paranoiac is a 1963 as part of British psychological horror film produced by Hammer directed by Freddie Francis and scripted by Jimmy Sangster.

The story centers around the wealthy Ashby family, who reside in a large, secluded mansion on the English coast included are the Ashby siblings, Simon (Oliver Reed) and Eleanor (Janette Scott), who are haunted by the tragic death of their parents in a car crash several years earlier. They live under the care of their guardian, Aunt Harriett (Sheila Burrell).

Many years prior, a tragic car accident claimed the lives of two affluent parents, leaving their three children in the care of an eccentric aunt. However, just a few years later, one of the sons seemingly took his own life, leaving behind a fragile and emotionally unstable daughter and a spoiled, belligerent son who indulges in alcohol, exhibits emotional volatility, and behaves abhorrently in every way imaginable.

The sister, who was never a paragon of mental stability, becomes convinced she has encountered her dead brother, Tony, despite all evidence to the contrary. When Tony (Alexander Davion) unexpectedly resurfaces sometime later, doubt lingers over whether he is truly the lost sibling or a cunning impostor. This unexpected return sends Reed’s character spiraling further into madness, accentuating his already unstable and erratic behavior. Paranoiac co-stars Maurice Denham and Lillian Brousse.

The Psychopath 1966

The Psychopath is a uniquely creative and disturbing British horror offering from Amicus produced by Max J. Rosenberg and Milton Subotsky Released in 1966, it was directed by Freddie Francis with a screenplay by Robert Bloch. The film revolves around a series of gruesome murders that shock the tranquil streets of London. Each victim is found with a doll placed near their lifeless body, bearing a striking resemblance to the deceased and their method of execution.

Beginning with Reinhardt Klermer, a middle-aged amateur violinist is on his way to meet his friends who play together as a chamber quartet when a red car runs him down – repeatedly. The unseen murderer leaves a doll in Klermer’s likeness which even includes a miniature violin case. On the scene is Inspector Holloway portrayed by Patrick Wymark, who takes charge of the investigation and believes the murder is most likely committed by one of Klermer’s ensemble. Until, they too are killed (poisoned, stabbed, and hanged) accompanied by dolls, that are tokens of their death left at the crime scene along with their dead bodies. Holloway discovers that each of the victims had given evidence against a convicted war criminal whose bizarre paralyzed widow (Margaret Johnston -Flora Carr in Night of the Eagle aka Burn, Witch Burn 1962) and her curious son Mark (John Standing) seem likely suspects. Both the queer Von Sturms are collectors of dolls. Also under suspicion are Louise Saville (Judy Huxtable) and her fiance (Donald Loftis), because one of the victims was Louise’s father who did not approve of their getting married. Holloway even finds a doll with his likeness but that doesn’t stop him from getting at the truth.

There are some very effectively creepy moments and the art direction of Von Sturm’s doll-infested house is perfectly macabre. Perhaps there are those who will find this game of cat and mouse giallo cliche but the final scene of the film still causes a shudder in me that still seems to linger. The puzzle is solved but it's nearly an excessively unpleasant revelation that left me with a queasy shudder at the end.

Detective Superintendent Holloway portrayed by Patrick Wymark, takes charge of the investigation, and he soon discovers that the victims are all connected to a past crime. As he delves deeper into the case, he unravels a web of dark demented secrets.

As Holloway races against time to catch the elusive killer, the film keeps the audience on the edge of their seats with its suspenseful atmosphere and a chilling score by composer Elisabeth Lutyens and pulp fiction-style layouts by cinematographer John Wilcox (The Third Man 1949).

The Possession of Joel Delaney 1972

The Possession of Joel Delaney 1972 is an unsettling American horror film directed by Waris Hussein. The movie is often noted for its exploration of supernatural and psychological horror elements, which align with the distinct characteristics of horror films from the early 1970s.

Norah Benson (played by Shirley MacLaine), is a successful career woman living in New York City. Her life takes a disturbing turn when her brother Joel Delaney (played by Perry King) becomes possessed by a malevolent spirit.

Joel, once a gentle and caring family man, starts exhibiting violent and erratic behavior. He begins to speak in a strange and menacing voice, displaying a complete personality change that terrifies Norah. Desperate to understand and help her brother, she delves into the mystery surrounding his possession.

As Norah tries to grapple with her brother’s transformation as she investigates, she uncovers a sinister connection between Joel and a mysterious woman from the city’s underworld named Alvean (played by Lovelady Powell). Alvean seems to hold the key to Joel’s possession and the dark forces at play. Like many horror films of the 1970s, the movie incorporates elements of cultural and social commentary, reflecting the anxieties that arose in that decade of filmmaking.

Phobia 1980

Phobia is a 1980 psychological thriller directed by John Huston and starring Paul Michael Glaser. Glaser plays a psychiatrist Dr. Peter Ross, involved in a radical new therapy and comes under suspicion when his patients are murdered, each according to their individual phobias. The film co-stars John Colicos, Susan Hogan, Patricia Collins, Lisa Langlois, and Alexandra Stewart.

Parents 1989

Parents 1989 is -excuse the pun – a delicious black comedy/social commentary/horror film directed by Bob Balaban. The film’s appropriately bizarre title for its Germany release was ‘Daddy ist ein Kannibale’, or ‘Daddy is a Cannibal!'

The story is set in the 1950s and follows a young boy named Michael Laemle (Brian Madorsk). Michael Laemle is the young and curious protagonist of the film. He’s a sensitive boy who becomes increasingly suspicious of his parents’ behavior. As he unravels the dark secrets of his family, he becomes the audience’s passport into the disturbing world of the Laemle household. Michael’s transformation from innocence to paranoia is a central theme in the film. Sure it's not missed that the surname of the family in this movie is “Laemle”, a likely nod to Carl Laemmle Jr. producer of such horror classics as Frankenstein 1931, Dracula 1931, The Mummy 1932 and The Invisible Man 1933.

He starts to become suspicious of his parents, Nick (Randy Quaid) and Lily (Mary Beth Hurt), as he notices their peculiar behavior. His father works for a meat company, and the family consumes a lot of meat themselves, but Michael suspects that it might not be ordinary Grade-A choice cuts of beef. As he grows increasingly paranoid, he dives deeper into and uncovers disturbing secrets about his parents and their gruesome eating habits. They are cannibalistic murderers.

Parents is a unique and unsettling blend of black comedy and horror that delves into themes of conformity, the American family, and the dark underbelly of suburban life.

It serves as a satirical commentary on the conformist values of 1950s suburban America and portrays a seemingly idyllic family and neighborhood, which hides a disturbing and taboo theme of cannibalism. The film explores the idea that beneath the facade of normalcy, people may be repressing their darker impulses. Parent’s dark humor is at the core essence of Balaban’s film. It finds absurdity in the mundane and macabre doings of the Laemle family’s life. The contrast between the sunny, idyllic facade and the nightmarish truth is skillfully woven into the narrative to evoke simultaneous astonishment and amusement, played for both shocks and laughs. Its unconventional take on suburbia has endeared it to dedicated aficionados of offbeat, cult cinema. The eerie retro visual paintings of 50s American living, photographed by cinematographers Ernest Day and Robin Vidgeon, and the provocative score by Jonathan Elias contribute to the film’s overall sense of unease.

Nick Laemle: Michael, are you ready to behave? I thought I’d tell you a little story? Want to hear a story? I’ll tell you a little story and I want you to shut up until I’m finished.
Michael Laemle: [Tied to a chair by his father] You eat people.
Nick: I’ve been watching you, Michael. You’re an outsider, you’re not like them. You’re like us.
Michael: I don’t love you any more.
Lily Laemle: Yes, you do.
Nick: We’re bound for life, no matter how much you hate us.(as he slowly unties Michael] I’m untying, and when you’re free, you can sit down with us and eat, or you could run outside and shout your little secret to the world. And you know what they’ll do, Michael, hmm? They’ll come here and they’ll burn us. Is that what you want? You want to see them burn your parents?
Lily: Mint jelly?

One of my favorite actors who doesn’t get enough attention is Sandy Dennis. Here she has a supporting role as Millie Dew the school social worker who is worried about Michael’s behavior and is one of the outside figures who begins to sense that something is amiss in the Laemle family.

Many critical essays on Parents delve into its social commentary, particularly its critique of 1950s suburban conformity and the facade of the nuclear family. The film portrays the unsettling idea that beneath the veneer of a perfect suburban family, there may be hidden, disturbing secrets. Some essays examine the psychological horror aspects of the film, focusing on the transformation of the protagonist, Michael, from innocence to paranoia. The Laemle family serves as a metaphor for the anxieties and fears lurking in the American psyche during the 1950s. Parents also challenge traditional gender roles, with the mother, Lily, taking on a more dominant and unsettling role compared to the father, Nick. This inversion of gender expectations adds layers to the film’s exploration of identity and conformity.

This is your EverLovin’ Joey Sayin’ Phew! glad that’s over! Stay tuned for the letter Q unless that gives you the quivers!